Wichita Kansas Presidential Breakdown And Election Analysis

In Texas elections serve an important and vital role in how the state functions. They are the people’s way of expressing their right to democracy. It is through these elections that we are able select public officials who will represent our state and work towards making it better. They also allow voters to vote on potential changes to the Texas Constitution. Something that can help to improve the policies that we currently have in our state (Champagne and Harpham 135).

The information bellow comes from a website called The Texas Tribune which shows the results of all positions. To start off the U.S senate position was a land slide. On the republican side Ted Cruz got 85% while the other republican candidates got less than 10 percent. The democratic side had similar results; Beto O'Rourke got 60 percent while the other candidates got less than 30. For the U.S house, Louie Gohmert (republican) got 88.3 percent and Shirley J. McKellar got 61 percent. Not very many went for the comptroller position, in fact for republicans Glenn Hegar was the only one who ran. Only 2 ran on the democratic side and Joi Chevalier had 51.9 percent of the votes. For the Governor position Greg abbot got 90 percent and Lupe Valdez got 40 percent. The lieutenant position also did not have very many runners; 2 voted on each side. The lead for democratic was Mike Collier with 52.4 percent; the lead for the republican was Dan Patrick with 76.0 percent. For the agriculture commissioner no one ran except for Kim Olson, and the republican who won was Sid Miller with 55.8 percent. There were a few district positions that ended up having a runoff. District 3, district 5, district 7 are just a few examples of many. There are other positions that went for running that are not listed here such as railroad commissioner and the district positions. One interesting fact of the election is a lot more females are running for congress compared to previous

Sabya Poudel Prof. Sherry Sharifian GOVT 2306-71426 October 29, 2017 The Champaign I would seek to run for the U.S House of Representative from Texas. I plan to have a cost of $18 per vote. As we know, different factors influence the cost of running for the office in Texas. The factor includes number of votes and the amount of resources that the candidates puts on. In my case, the number of votes that I would secure and resources that I have would seek to influence my spending levels. The campaigns that are targeted to national levels can be higher costs as compared to the district levels. Being a new person in the race would mean that I would have to invest more expenses as compared to incumbent individuals. 1 According to The

The New Jersey Gubernatorial election is coming up and citizens must vote for the candidate they think will best serve their needs. New Jersey’s Constitution includes that general elections shall be held annually on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November also, the time of holding such elections may be altered by law. Currently there are two candidates, Kim Guadagno who is on the Republican side and Phil Murphy who stands on the Democratic side. Both candidates have contradictory perspectives on topics that are spoken about during the debates. I believe Phil Murphy is the best candidate due to his promising ideas on controversial issues that are seen in New Jersey. Considering that there are more democrats than republicans in

In Texas, elections are regulated by the state constitution and the state law. Elections are the means by which citizens choose their governmental officials and express their opinions on public policy issues. As at the national scale, Texas’ political space is dominated by two main parties: the Democrat Party, and the Republican Party. The ideologies (liberal, conservative) espoused by these two parties are opposed. These ideologies influence their way of governing, with a direct impact on people. However, Texas ranks among the lowest in voting compare to other states. This phenomenon can be explained through the political history of Texas, and its social configuration. Throughout the analysis, an identification of who tends vote and who does not would be done.

With every state comes a specific and distinctive history of politics, and, more often than not, a brief understanding of the cultural changes that occurred throughout the years. Texas has one of the most interesting shifts: an almost clean-cut shift from a Democratic, or ‘blue’, state, to a Republican, or ‘red’, state, after nearly 100 years of Democratic dominance. This is comparable to the state of Virginia, which also saw Republican representation after Democratic dominance for nearly 50 years. However, where Texas remains mainly Republican today, Virginia is an accurate embodiment of a “two-party state”. With this being said, that doesn’t mean Texas will stay this way. While the Lone Star state still votes red and has Republican

Reza Shrestha Prof. 1 Sherry Sharifian GOVT 2306 18th April, 2018 How much does it cost to run for office in Texas?

In Wichita, 15.4% of residents live in poverty, with some neighborhoods having more than 40% of the residents living in extreme poverty (2010 census).

Asish Thapa Professor Sherry Sharifian GOVT-2306-71001 28th September 2017 According to Texas Tribune analysis, the sum of hopeful spends per vote depends on three factors: how much a candidate assembles first year recruits, how much a candidate spends and what number of votes a cheerful gets. 1 Taking a gander at how much the contenders spent per vote proposes money doesn't constantly have any sort of impact in a definitive outcome. Probably the costliest battles were controlled by individuals you have probably never knew about.

In the book What’s the Matter With Kansas by Thomas Frank, a phenomenon has been happening which many people do not understand. In the sixties, Kansans were voting for democrats during the election. This was seen as typical and normal since democrats are meant to help lower and middle class people. This did not stay for long since shortly after Kansans started to vote for republicans which goes against the belief of what is assumed. Republicans are known for trying to lower the tax on the upper class and are against of many things things such as abortion. The author tries to understand why in person the views that Kansans have match with democrats yet when they vote it is for republicans. The reason this is happening is due to religion.

Your one vote could mean the difference between the right and the wrong person gaining a very important position. For example, in the year 2000’s United States Presidential Race, George Bush only gained victory due to winning the state of Florida by a hair. It was the closest race in U.S. history. If only a few thousand would have voted Al Gore would probably have gained the presidency. Picture it like this, what if there were a candidate that wanted to attack your rights? Maybe you’re a woman and you believe you should be able to have an abortion and a particular candidate wants to take that choice away. Maybe you’re a law abiding Muslim and a certain person in the running for an office wants to kick all of your race out of the country. Perhaps

Iowa is viewed by many as lacking diversity in many areas, such as culture, careers, and even income. However, when one takes the time to look closer, there are many socioeconomic differences, even within the span of a few miles. To highlight this, I have selected Cobblestone Estates in DeWitt, as well as Broadway Street in Charlotte. These two neighborhoods are within a fifteen-minute drive, yet they are vastly different in many ways. Cobblestone Estates is a brand new suburb in DeWitt. Broadway Street, on the other hand, is an old neighborhood that’s been in existence since the town’s founding in the mid 1800s.By studying the locations, home values, and physical appearance of these neighborhoods, we are able to draw conclusions about their socioeconomic statuses.

Kajol Puri From the beginning, of election, it is very costly to run office in Texas.

In the mid-twentieth century, the news media were one of America’s most trusted institutions. The 1956 American National Election Study (ANES) found that 66% of Americans thought newspapers were fair, while only 27% said they were unfair. These views were bipartisan, with 78% of Republicans and 64% of Democrats viewing newspapers as fair. When the Roper Organization asked a similar question about network news in two 1964 polls, 71% and 61% of the public thought it was fair, while just 12% and 17% thought it was unfair. In 1973, when the General Social Survey (GSS) began regularly measuring con dence in various national institu- tions, only 15% of respondents had “hardly any” con dence in the press.

The election of 2000 is a true story based on the presidential campaign between Governor Bush and vice-president Al Gore. This election was significant due to the controversy regarding Florida’s ballots and became the first election where the Supreme Court largely affected the outcome of the presidential election. With Bush leading the poll by 1,784 votes, this allowed Gore’s campaign to request a mandatory machine recount with a 0.3% difference in votes. However, many of Florida's counties refused to rerun the ballots in the machine. Instead, they would rerun the memory card. As a result, ballot chad's became the dilemma of the election and possibly change the entire outcome in presidential history. Under those circumstances, Gore’s campaigned