Wikileaks Case Study Essay

Edward Snowden and the PRISM leak: On June 6, 2013, The Guardian broke the news that the U.S. National Security

These governments are attempting to stop these whistleblowers because; by law, they are committing high treason. High treason is a very serious crime and the idea of it going unpunished is terrible. At the same time, I do not wish to create something that will simply make the government look dutiful. This is why I aim to portray Edward Snowden as the main focus. While he was persecuted and is still wanted by the United States for high treason, he is no longer their focus and not being hunted down like a rat. This makes him the ideal centering point to demonstrate how the concept should be

Claiming its actions are related to the War on Terror, the NSA has insisted that these programs are legal, have not been abused, and are vital to preventing terror attacks. The leaked programs have not only created domestic furor, but also put U.S. diplomatic relations with its allies in jeopardy. With the overthrow of the Ukrainian government creating tension between the U.S. and Russia, Snowden's asylum in Russia is a political and diplomatic blow to U.S. prestige and moral authority. And with the threat of further Snowden leaks looming, future U.S. intelligence operations may hinge on the willingness of Washington to alter its policies.

The question of whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, whose organization can be credited with releasing thousands of classified documents from various countries, is a hero or a villain depends entirely on one’s political opinions. Those who believe in transparent government and freedom of speech/publishing would call Assange a hero. Those who believe governments must have some secrecy from citizens would call him a villain. As a believer in the ideals America was founded on it is clear that Assange’s actions are heroic. He is fighting to keep the average citizen informed of any corruption within their government, fighting for the mainstream press to stop supporting the government’s views on

The Internet is one of the most widespread ways to exchange data, and a website called WikiLeaks has received a great amount of attention from the knowledge it releases. The details they give are known to be confidential and provide society with an inside view on what is really happening behind of the closed doors of the federal government. The site is based on the “belief that a more transparent government will bring better consequences for all, and that leaking information has an inherent tendency toward greater justice” (Singer 465). WikiLeaks gives its readers a way to honestly know all the significant facts and records that are purposefully kept away from

During times of economic downturn, employees can feel susceptible. Employers may need to reduce contracted hours or change staff job roles to save money. This leads to staff feeling exposed and concerned about possible redundancy, which in turn effects how they relate to the organisation.

Given the state of the recession and how it might have affected an organisation’s finances, this has a large impact on the employment relationship i.e. due to cuts there be maybe redundancies, therefore leading to loss of jobs.

-Whistleblowing: Whistleblowing is a way in which you can make other members of staff/managers aware of any poor practice, concerns or illegality. It’s important that anyone concerned about issues surrounding safeguarding should be able to report them in a confidential way which has no repercussions towards the individual who reported it. All members of staff should feel that they are able to raise concerns without any fear of discrimination or victimisation.

Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the

Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.

In early 2013 a man by the name of Edward Joseph Snowden began leaking classified National Security Agency (NSA) documents to media outlets, which in turn ended up in public ears. These documents, mainly involving intelligence Snowden acquired while working as an NSA contractor, are mostly related to global surveillance programs run by the NSA. This has raised multiple ethical issues ranging from national security, information privacy and the ethics behind whistleblowing in general. The reach and impact of these leaks have gone global and have put in question the very government that protects us as well as the extent of the public’s rights on privacy. Various foreign

Edward Snowden isn’t the only person who believes what the U.S. had done was wrong, but also many American leaders, and other nations around the world. The United States had not only been collecting data on their own citizens, but also of other countries leaders and citizens. The release of these documents had strained political relationships between the U.S. and other allied nations. The knowledge and truth other leaders and nations had gained

In a country that supports freedom of speech, expressing one's thought is important. An article called Wikileaks, by Nozomi Hayase explains how wikileaks supports the first amendment. Wikileaks is a website created by Julian Assange, his purpose was to show people what the government was hiding from its citizens. It's important for us to to witness evidence and hear the truth from an actual resource rather than media's lies. The first amendment states, “ individual's rights of freedom of religion, speech, and the press” (Congress 1999).

377). Moreover, Assange’s determination to “help whistleblowers that would expose wrongdoings of government and private enterprises” (Gunnell, 2011, p. 32 ) is believed has transformed the ideas of global communication process.

Julian Assange is an Australian computer programmer who's mostly known for founding WikiLeaks. Assange was born on the 3rd of July 1971 in Townsville in Queensland Australia to parents who were in the theater business, this resulted in him being in 37 different schools or homeschooled most of his childhood. He was known to always fight for the "underdog", a trait he believes that he still possesses. From a young age, Julian showed a strong ability with computers and his mother bought him is first computer at the age of 16.