Wikileaks Exposed The Corruption And Unethical Behavior Within The Democratic Party Essay

President Barack Obama did many things to get to the positions he is at now.” Obama himself struggled with his mixed-race identity and sought to figure out how he fit in with the rest of the world”(Source B). He also had many problems growing up and many complications to get through school since he didn’t have much money. But Obama showed great appreciation for the things he had. He went out in his community becoming a great leader. Not only did he go out in his community and be a leader, But he showed great leadership, as a senate and as a president.Barack Obama was more than just an ordinary President, but he showed great leadership, hard work and cared for others than himself.

Watergate Scandal has been considered as one of the darkest chapters in American history. The event not only refers to unethical use of power by the public representatives but also levied great deal of attention on the mechanism of surveillance over the activities of public servants. Watergate scandal provides ethical directions not only to public servants but also provides ethical guidelines to the lawyers and media representatives as well. This incident reveals how ethical lines were crossed time and again by the politicians, legal attorneys and media for their own purposes. Ignoring the righteousness of the outcomes, events like these cause severe damage to the public's trust vested in these authorities which takes a long time to restore.

When the news of the email and investigation were out many were in no support to have someone like Hillary as a president. They did encourage a liar to be our president and did not think someone like Clinton would be fit to run the country. Just days before polls opened the FBI made a surprising decision to re-examine Hillary and newly related emails. Many liberals and conservatives were angered by this decision and democrats said the FBI should have gathered more facts before making it public. Only to announce that the FBI would not reverse its past decision. Among democrats a cause of concern occurred when news about the FBI broke out; A third of the voters said they were less likely to support Clinton.(Roberts, Dan) Hillary herself was said to blame part of her loss of the

While it is undeniable that both of the Obama and Clinton campaigns were successful, their methods for winning could not be more different. Attacking against other candidates, defending personal relations, and putting others on the defense were all tactics that Bill Clinton used to win, going in line with how politics were run back in 1992. Attending rallies, speaking for the people, and shaking hands were Obama's main means for winning. Both campaigns had vastly different methods for winning, and both races were very close at one point. Ultimately, both candidates were able to read the attitude of the American public at that time and deliver what the public wanted to see, a candidate that, in their eyes, would be perfect for president.

There was allegations of the diversion of funds from Whitewater through the Madison Saving and Loan to cover some of the campaign debts of the Clinton's. There were also allegations of whether the Clinton's gained income-tax benefits from the failure of Whitewater that they were not entitled to. To date no charges have been filed against President Clinton or his wife Hillary (Whitewater 1). The whole Watergate scandal, brought about charges of political bribery, burglary, extortion, wiretapping, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, tax fraud, and illegal use of the CIA and the FBI, campaign contributions and taxpayers money for private matters. In all, more than 30 administration officials and other people in the Nixon administration pleaded guilty or were found guilty of illegal acts (Time and Again 2).

Everything was going great until the media found out about a secret affair between the president and white house intern Monica Lewinsky. Once this story hit newsstands across the nation the president was the only name people were talking about. It has been heard of before about former president John F. Kennedy with celebrity actress Marylin Monroe, but the nation found out about it after his death, so Americans didn’t take it to heart so severely as they did with Clinton. Because of this incident he was looked at more thoroughly by all government officials, so he was taken to court on accounts of perjury and obstruction of justice for that same incident with Monica

There are two theories behind the motives of the D.N.C. network breach. Mainstream media, and the left, announce that Russian hackers committed the server breach in order to influence American polls in Donald Trump’s favor. Their reasoning is: 1) both Russian President Putin and Donald Trump have a lot to gain from creating distrust between Hillary Clinton and Democratic voters before November 8th, 2) President Putin and Donald Trump are visibly friends (Hamburger, Helderman, Birnbaum 2016). The Republican candidate has

Not everything President Clinton did was viewed as morally correct by the public. The sex scandal with White House intern Monica Lewinsky tarnished his up until then spotless reputation; that caused some of the public eyes opinion to change. Before the sex scandal happened Clinton was revered for his policies. People are always looking for flaws and Monica Lewinsky just happened to be Bill Clinton’s. It was not a public matter that needed to be discussed, it was a marriage affair that should have stayed private between Lewinsky, Clinton, and the first lady Hillary Clinton. The public didn’t need to make a big deal about, nor didn’t need to know about it. People who look back on it now say the public “clowned” Clinton for something that was not even their business. Though Clinton is mostly known for the sex scandal his legacy he lives lies within the fact he was the first baby-boomer

The Russian hacking of the DNC was an event filled with a great amount of confusion and skepticism. Many people do believe that the Russians were involved in hacking the DNC, leading to Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election. Other people, however, believe there is insufficient evidence to believe that something like this would occur; even if it did, these same people believed it was necessary because it exposed the faults of the DNC. The two articles that I selected discuss this situation in depth, but they write their stories by using different approaches. Sam Biddle, an author from the website, The Intercept, writes about how the information given to support the claims that the Russians hacked the DNC are not enough. The

"Michelle Obama never wanted to be the kind of first lady who interfered with West Wing business, she told her aides. It was her husband’s administration, not hers, she sometimes said. She had little appetite or expertise for policy detail, and she knew the history of first ladies —like Nancy Reagan and Mrs. Clinton — who had been deemed meddlers, unelected figures who wielded unearned power”(Kantor,

One of the beauties of being in a democracy is being able to let the citizens decide who they want as their leader. Enter 2016, an election year for the United States America as politicians prepare for campaigns in hopes to be elected President. During an election candidates set up their platforms discussing the issues that matter, issues that America has plenty of. From immigration reform, to healthcare, to gun regulations, the United States has no shortage of problems that need to be addressed. Both Democrats and Republicans present solutions as to how such problems can be resolved. When the right person is picked for job, it is simply amazing what can be accomplished. President Barack Obama,

In other words, most Americans think she is a deceiver. This is due to her past controversies such as the emails, and Benghazi issues. The email issues started because of Clinton using a private domain out of “convenience”

There were various things that should have been settled, for example, the imploded lodging market and the crumple of the economy. The bramble organization accomplished one of the most reduced endorsement appraisals ever (Green and Roberts, 2012). Amid the presidential decision, there was a sob for change. Youthful voters needed a pioneer who motivates and has a reasonable vision. This was precisely what Barack Obama did as a pioneer. He caught the youthful voters' consideration and gave the American individuals the change they've been aching for. He is a decent case of a transformational

President Clinton was a man entangled in his own ruins. He went from one lie to another and eventually was so caught up in them, that he was trapped. These lies brought on his downfall as a great leader. He was flawed like everyone, yet being a representative of the people, you need to keep these flaws hidden so that weakness is not shown. His failings were revealed to the whole world and his pride and integrity fell with them. The world no longer saw a leader, but a broken man. This was his ultimate failure. However, another big failure Clinton had while in office was his failure to

Obama’s reasoning develops ideas that help connect her claim and evidence using the rhetoric device of ethos. She quotes, “...we have a candidate… [that] has said things about women that are so shocking, so demeaning that I simply will not repeat anything here today. And last week I saw this candidate actually bragging about sexually assaulting women,” (Obama, 2016). Obama explains the terrible acts Trump has done to help her argument in why citizens should vote for Hillary and not Trump. Obama spoke about the frequent sexual assault Trump has been associated with. Multiple times, he has spoken inappropriately towards women. By First Lady Obama mentioning this, she is