Wild Revenge in Medea Essay

Medea questions the firmly held belief in Greek society that women are weak and passive. Wanting revenge on Jason for his betrayal of her, Medea must take control of the situation, a stereotypical masculine quality. Though she cannot become a man or take power like a man, she perceives her

Euripides also carefully reveals the elements of Medea's past that demonstrate her readiness to violate solidarity of family ties in order to pursue her intractable will; Jason and Medea's original tryst, for example, required that she kill her own brother, thus choosing marriage ties over blood ties. Secondly, Medea's selfishness provides power to her fatal flaw. Medea's selfishness and lack of humanity is displayed through the act of killing her own two sons. Medea understands that the slaying of her children will make Jason miserable. During this time, the chorus recognizes her self-worship and states, “But can you have the heart to kill your flesh and blood” (Euripides, The Medea, 816)? Medea does not stop to think what pain she may cause to herself by murdering them. She is only concerned about her happiness that will be derived from Jason's grieving. Medea comes to the conclusion that it is worth the suffering just to see her ex-husband unhappy. Medea states, “Yes, for this is the best way to wound my husband” (Euripides, The Medea, 817). This exhibits Medea's selfishness by the slaying of her sons just to cause sorrow to Jason for her own pleasure. Medea's rage also leads to her fatal flaw of excessive passion. Her excessive passion, fed by rage, leads Medea to do uncalled-for acts of violence and murder.

Medea is the tragic story of a woman desperate for revenge upon her husband, after he betrayed her for another woman’s bed. It was written by Euripides, a Greek playwright, in 431 B.C. Throughout the play each character shows us their inconsistent and contradicting personalities, in particular, Jason and Medea. The play opens with the Nurse expressing her anxiety about Jason betraying and leaving Medea for another, wealthier, woman. Our initial reaction is to feel empathetic towards Medea, who has been abandoned so conveniently. But towards the end of the play, when Medea takes revenge on

Medea, by Euripides is an Ancient Greek tragedy that is purley entirely nourished by passion and Reason which both, isn't more powerful than the other in shaping this primordial Greek cataclysm. In many ways passion early on in the play is feed into the character's reasoning, however in the end, reason plays a more prominent role because of the actions of the characters. Medea is a character who is ruled by her emotions which is driven by Jason's betrayal. Medea's revenge against Jason is in many ways a product of a reason due to Jason’s deception of divine oths. Medea’s passion fuels her reasoning in her contretemps throughout the play.

The story of Medea is a tragic and controversial tale that portrays the effect of revenge and how it can touch and severely damage a family. Creon, the king of Corinth along with his beloved daughter Glauce, are caught up in the seemingly vile plot that Medea is conceiving against her Jason her husband along with her family. However to fully understand the role that Creon the king of Corinth plays that ultimately leads to his death and that of his beloved Glauce, we have to delve into Medea’s estranged relationship with her husband, Jason. Glauce unwillingly becomes part of Medea’s life after Jason’s desire to make her his bride become known. Creon’s actions to protect his beloved daughter are visible from earlier on when he exiled Medea. In this paper, I will examine Creon and his daughter and whether his actions are what ultimately resulted in his death.

In Apollonius of Rhodes’ Argonautica, written in the 3rd Century BC, the character Medea’s complexity intrigues, enchants and horrifies us. Her passionate dedication to Jason and, consequently, the failure of their marriage, leads Medea to commit multiple horrific acts. She plans and commits the murders of numerous people, including her own two sons. However, it is not Medea’s free will that leads her to commit these actions. Medea’s decisions are not a consequence of her own cruelty, but of her desperation, since her free will has been stolen by men around her. Medea is an archetype of a woman betrayed, who sacrifices her own power for the goal of another in the name of love, of a marriage gone wrong. Who has not known of an intelligent woman who fell in love, gave up her opportunities to make the success of her husband possible, only to be thrown away for a younger and more beautiful woman? Apollonius immerses Medea in a story of revenge, war and bloodshed. At its core though, Medea’s own story is about betrayal and being an outsider. Medea should not be identified as a savage, but as a symbol of what can occur when an unbearably distressed person is oppressed and outcast by their family, husband, and society.

An audience will fear the possibility of loss. Jason’s ordeal, though partially his own doing, describes a pain that many people fear. Loss and death are feared and Jason becomes a victim of these two terrifying aspects of life. Although he is not innocent, Jason’s role as Medea’s victim allows him to be the root of the play’s

Revenge The Orphan of Chao and Medea are two completely different stories. One is a Chinese based and the other Greek. The only thing these two tales have in common is the use of revenge. Now revenge is when someone takes it upon themselves to inflict either physical harm, mental harm or both to an individual that they believe did them wrong.

In this day, women want their husbands to be left broke if they had anything to give to begin with. Their revenge is a cruel, but not as a harsh as Medea’s revenge. In some cases, women have killed their children to get back at the father. I don’t understand what could possess you to kill your own child. In my opinion, Medea’s actions are not justified.

For commemorate their tragic love, they use different ways revenge the person they love. In Medea, Poison and making Jason childless are the way Medea chooses revenge. Medea loses her family because Jason, so, when Medea was betrayed by Jason, her feels hopeless and gets crazy which cause she begins her revenge plan.

Once, he got her trust he then betrayed her. Medea’s revenge is dictated by a masculine regime of truth. Medea being under a particular regime of truth that is incredibly masculine allows her anger to turn into revenge and her want for power causes her to think about death. She does not know any other way; she has learned that this tactic is how you gain power.

The Greek tragedy, Medea by Euripides, is a tale which explores the motivational desires of each character in their various pursuits. We come to realise how Medea’s judgements within the play are based on passion and somewhat selfishness, whereas Jason’s decisions are also somewhat based on logic and planning for the future. Medea expresses her passion through her desire for Jason and uses this as her motivation. She also has a strong belief in retribution and revenge which makes her character appear selfish. Jason appears to plan with logic for the future and his children but in turn is transfixed by power and wealth.

To conclude, Medea’s actions can be seen an act of desperation from her side, as she realises that her functional life in Greece is practically over: she is a woman with no man, therefore no rights. Although through her barbaric background and natural cunningness, she forges a plan to escape this miserable prospect of her life, her actions, as terrible and inhumane as they are, empower her to free herself from her discriminating

“You’re wise by nature, you know evil acts…” were the words used by Creon to describe Medea (Puchner 535). “Madness in great ones must not unwatched go” was said of Hamlet by King Claudius (Puchner1849). How different yet similar are the two descriptions of literature’s most discussed figures when it comes to revenge. Medea’s wisdom was known throughout Corinth because of her efforts to save Jason after he captured the Golden Fleece. Her anger after Jason’s betrayal was also known. Hamlet was known as the Prince of Denmark. His anger against King Claudius was only known to his trusted friend Horatio. Anger and vengeance are very dangerous if not handled carefully. The vengeance of Medea and Hamlet were quite different in approach, but both ended with tragic and deadly consequences.

This play discussed the relationship between the respected and feared Medea and the father of her children and proud warrior Jason and how over time the trust between both of them got tested and it caused the viewers to truly consider that there is a lesson within the struggle that Medea and Jason go through during this moment in their life. Also at the time of the first performance most people only knew of two types of plays, comedy and tragedy and it caused an obvious sense of tragedy because everything in the character Medea’s life