preview

William Golding's Lord Of The Flies: A Freudian Analysis

Decent Essays

Within William Golding’s Lord of the Flies there is a noticeable use of Freudian ideology as Golding raises questions about the nature of human behavior. The novel proffers certain ideas pertaining to the psychology of humans that are able to serve as lessons on human nature itself. It is able to establish a narrative that deploys the idea of man not being inherently evil, but still carrying the potential of it (a Freudian ideology) thus implying that rule and enforced laws are essential to a civilized society. The novel also establishes the idea that the state of a society is wholly dependent on the potential and actions of its inhabitants. Throughout the novel it is shown that even though all members of a society are capable of committing …show more content…

This is found directly in a scene between Roger and Henry, “Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry—threw it to miss… Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life,” (Golding, 62). Here Roger adheres to a categorical imperative, following the unspoken laws that had been previously conditioned by the society of the modern world he had been a part of. It is this adherence that keeps the situation from devolving into a place of savagery. By the time Roger enters Merridew’s savage society, this part of him is long gone as is evidenced by him dropping the large boulder that kills Piggy. As time progresses, it becomes abundantly clear that this use of Kant’s categorical imperative is essential to the society remaining intact. A thought occurs to Ralph after calling an assembly to discuss rule enforcement that ultimately failed that truly highlights the situation, “the world, that understandable and lawful world, was slipping away,” (Golding, 91). It is due to the refusal of the other boys to follow established rules and subsequently the lack of enforced law on the island that lead to the decay of the society and the eventual emergence of a second, more savage society. It is the emergence of this second society, Jack Merridew taking de facto leadership, that properly puts into perspective the true impact the actions of members of a society have. Even before Merridew breaks away, it is clear that the mindset adopted by him and his consequent actions are due cause for civilized society to become disordered, “’I mean… what makes things break up like they do?’… ‘I dunno Ralph, I expect it’s him.’ … ‘Jack?’… ‘Jack,’”

Get Access