William James Factual Analysis

William James was able to distinguish between the tough- minded and in the same time the tender- minded personalities and the worldviews. According to James, tough- minded is empiricists and the positivists and are majorly the opponent of religion and in most of the times what they perceive is a force promises to the world. On the other hand, the tender- minded are the religious protagonists.

In Utah, an eighteen-year-old boy, James Edwards, in foster care wants to get the right of owning an arm. Utah Division of Child and Family Services didn't give him permission to get a firearm, but the boy's attorney was defending his rights by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The judicial process didn't permit the Edwards to bear the firearm for the purposes of safety of the other people that are

November 5, 1844 James won the presidental election, he was known as “The Dark Horse” because of his oppenent that he won against, Henry Clay was a nominee of the Whig party. Of the electional votes Henry Clay got one-hundred and five votes as for, James he got one-hundred and seventhy votes. James campaign slogans were “fifthy four- forthy or fight.” Which meant the latatude of the british boundary of the Alaska and the Oregon Boundary. Another, slogan that James used was “Reannexation of Texas and Reoccopaton of Oregon.” When James became the president he made a campaign promise to be a one-term presidet and not seek reelection. James made promises and he kept them through his term. In 1845, James second year into presidency, he sent John

James reflected on the concept of smart power which makes him responsible for any harm he causes, he has personal power to make choices, and every choice has consequence whether good or bad.

Being an LAS James Scholar means to be academically challenged and to put forth best effort in any given task. Whether it is through working on the end-of-the-semester projects for honors classes or being involved in extracurricular activities, James Scholar students are taught to think through issues in a multifaceted approach so that they are able to work efficiently with students from different backgrounds and experiences. In this day and age, possessing teamwork and leadership skills is a must-have in classrooms and beyond that in our jobs as future alumni of the University of Illinois. The LAS James Scholar community fosters these skills through collaboration with some of UIUC’s finest faculty. Students are able to work one-on-one with faculty and delve deeper into their studies by learning about the latest breakthroughs in their fields and contribute to it by conducting their own research. Students within the

James taught at several universities including both Brown and Yale where he often had arguments and lengthy discussions with his students about religion. In his introductory comments, he clearly states that a lot of his freethinking students did not believe one should believe in religion if it cannot be rationally proven. This was contradictory to his thoughts and consequently wrote the paper in order to try sway his students view.

There are two ways a person can choose to live his life. A man can let life pass him by, or he can make a change and lead a legacy. An example of a product of time would be an extremely talented person who has the ability to achieve greatly, but achieves nothing short of failure in life. A sign of someone looking to change the world for the better is a person with great determination and confidence to achieve their goal. A person who determines history must always be devoted to helping send a message that will be kept forever. A person who changes the world, will be remembered throughout history for their message that they spread throughout the world.

On a similar note, by dissociating oneself from the literality, one finds in symbolic expressions, such as those of poetry and biblical stories, important truths that help humanity be aware of instances whose circumstances prevent the literality from being considered, such as in the case of moral arguments and moral relationships, as suggested in William James’ essay, “The Will to Believe.” James repudiates “solutions without sensible proof” in moral arguments. Arguably, religious experiences themselves are of moral nature, as they ultimately dictate which values and morals one depicts in everyday life. William James furthermore repudiates Pascal’s attempt at rationalizing belief in a theistic God-- he discourages thinking of religious experience theistically, claiming it is a misinterpretation. To emphasize, religious experiences must be seen in a spiritual light, as religious experiences are often too mundane and earthly to be used as rationalization for God’s existence. Henceforth in religious experiences, passional tendencies and personal proof factor into a belief like theistic or nontheistic religion. When faced with a genuine option-- one that is live, forced, and momentous-- one must allow passional tendencies to rule due to the subjective nature of the context. There are multiple solutions to one

On an ideological level, James sets up two systems: the modern sexual emancipator represented in Olive, and the radical conservative represented in Basil. Verena has to choose between them. Basil considers that Olive’s views about women’s liberation are inanities she is not sure of their meanings:

Enough about characters... I want now to speak of setting. There was none. James never described a setting with any significant degree of detail. A window would be looked through, and the reader would discover at the same time who was doing the looking, and the fact that the window existed at all. Even though this causes some abrupt "double-takes of the mind", if you will, when something new is mentioned that simply does not fit into the setting originally conceived of by the reader. Either the scene becomes

James I was an authoritarian who believed kings derived their powers from God, not from the people. This belief caused political tension between the king, the Parliament, and the

This passage shows how even a small choice in a person’s life, changes their destiny. How a person cannot simply take both paths they must choose. Once a path is chosen, they chose another and another until there is no clear way back to where they began.

Next, James believed that our thoughts constantly change. One can never have the exact same idea, sensation, or experience. All experiences are influenced by the ones before. Therefore, one can never have an identical occurrence. For example, every time I re-watch a movie it is a different experience. I notice things I hadn’t before, for example. Or, I may interpret a different meaning, and so on. If I am in a bad mood, I may not find a scene as funny as I had initially. Although it is the same exact movie, my thoughts about it are never exactly the same.

David and James began to walk towards David’s car. David looked at James and asked,” James is there anything else you need? “James just stood there staring into space. He stood there as if the weight of the whole world was on his shoulders. David placed his hand on James shoulders and they turned and exited the park. They began the long quiet walk to David’s Ford truck. They silently got into the truck and started the long drive towards Hano.

To begin, I would approach the feedback session with James by first establishing a mutual identification of the problem. The problem identification should be fairly easy to establish as gaps within the performance evaluation create conflicts of appraisal. These conflicts are derived mainly from the both the qualitative and quantitative factors prevailing in the appraisal. For one, the appraisal does not take into account the difficulty embedded in managing the most profitable branch in Los Angeles. These difficulties are apparent within the overall customer satisfaction scored, providing a detriment to the overall performance appraisal. Both parties, before beginning the formal appraisal must first understand the nature of the problem embedded within the appraisal itself. In particular, I would reference back to the over performance in regards to many of the quantitative metrics such as profit and margin. This metrics, by virtue of managing the most profitable branch in Los Angeles, have greatly exceeding expectations. I would also be sure to reference James' prior track record of over performance relative to his management peers. After this acknowledgment, I would then attempt to come to a mutual agreement regarding the nature of the appraisal and the problems entrenched within the overall process. By redefining the problem as a shared and collaborative effort, both parties involved can come to a mutually beneficial solution.