William Shakespeare's Sonnet 135 Final Essay

In William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 137 or “Thou blind fool, Love, what dost thou to mine eyes” the speaker appears to be blaming love and himself for being mislead about a woman. In the first quatrain the speaker is addressing “Love” as if it were a physical being when the speaker describes it to be a “blind fool” and questions what Love has done to his eyes (Lines 1-2). It can be interpreted that the “Love” is referring to Cupid as the one who is affecting the speaker’s eyesight. The speaker then goes on to explain that his eyes “know what beauty is” yet it mistakes the worst for the best (Lines 3-4). When the speaker mentions that his eyes can recognize beauty that can infer that the speaker is referring to a woman and that his eyes have

Poems use lots of different ways to express personal relationships. The authors of these poems can use language, tone, structure and many other ways to convey personal relationships. The poem Valentine by Carol Ann Duffy uses many of these aspects. The main idea of this poem is to compare an onion to the love a woman has for her lover. The poem Sonnet 130 by Shakespeare also uses language, tone, structure and imagery. This poem however uses them in a different way. This poem is about how a man loves his wife/lover in his own special way. These two poems use language, tone, structure, rhyme/rhythm and imagery to express a personal relationship.

about all her let downs when it comes to beauty and so compares it to

When thinking of a love poem, one thinks of a cliché description of the speaker’s lover or maybe is an imaginative portrayal of love in a general sense. Love poems always have an exaggerating characteristic when describing something or someone. “Sonnet 130” by William Shakespeare, is a parody of love poetry; love is not always like it is illustrated in others contemporaries poems.

Shakespearean Sonnets consist of 154 Sonnets that are well know for their themes such as passage of time, love, beauty, and mortality. Out of all the Sonnets, Sonnet 130 is the most significant because Shakespeare mocks the concept of traditional Sonnets. The traditional sonnet were usually love poems or Sonnets that person would show how much they praise someone or thing by exaggerating their beauty through imagery and comparisons. In Sonnet 130, Shakespeare does the complete opposite compared to his peers and compares his mistresses beauty in an unflattering way. He compares her beauty to the ideal Elizabethan female of that era but he still expresses his affection to her because of the way she truly looks. After a close analysis of the language and imagery that Shakespeare uses it shows that even with the harsh comparisons, he truly loves his mistress and that its better to express the truth rather than exaggeration of the truth.

In explication of sonnet 144 I would like to take a drastic change from what seems to be the common view of many in regards to who it is written about and the story behind it. I would like to state first of all that the straight facts about the sonnets are so few and that theories and debates are many. Doubt is cast over nearly every aspect of these sonnets. Arguments from when they were written, whom they were written to, why they were written, and even in many cases the question of who wrote them. The common thought of whom they were written to and why they were written has evolved as of late to reach a view of Shakespeare's sexual love affair with a young man and a mysterious mistress. While

In the event that I was the beneficiary of Sonnet 130, I would be offended. Obviously, Shakespeare composed it to ridicule me. The Sonnet is exceptionally elegantly composed utilizing analogies and inverse examinations. In the event that I got Sonnet 138, I would feel remorseful. Deceiving somebody is more troublesome when you realize that they know you're lying and they simply disregard it. I would feel stunned by the unkind silliness and think disgrace on him. The work 130 more impolite than 138 additionally more. These works by Shakespeare identify with the topic of adoration however Shakespeare, tired of the excessively sentimental view which individuals imply to support and which just confuses love, gives a rational view in both Sonnet

“Nay, if you read this line, remember not / The hand that writ it;(. . .)” (lines 5-6). By referring to himself as “the hand that writ it” (line 6) it seems like he’s trying to make his image seem less “material” as if he had only existed in his lover’s mind and it had all been just a dream. This would oblige his lover to forget him as though he had never existed. Following that, the speaker is more direct and also clearer about his wish of being forgotten “( . . .) for I love you so / That I in your sweet thoughts would be forgot” (lines 6 and 7).; he asks his lover not to remember him when reading the poem after his death; the speaker’s love is so pure and real that he’d rather have his lover forget him and not suffer than nurture a memory of him everyday, living in pain in consequence of these memories.

Many poets through history have written about love, this essay will examine how love is presented in 2 poems.

Poetry is a form of writing in where the author expresses his or her emotions through style and rhythm. There is no one specific reason why people like poetry. Not only is poetry personal, it can also be deeply emotional to people, as poems can bring back memories and experiences that have resonated throughout the reader's life. Love poetry is not only deeply emotional for people, but it's something most people can relate to as most people will experience some form of love throughout their life. Easily the most famous poet in history, Shakespeare, had many thoughts on love, and many of his poems invoke this emotion. Sonnet 130 specifically is thought provoking and much more relatable than other poems of the 1600’s, and like most of Shakespeare's sonnets, this poem is an expression of love. This is due to the fact that Shakespeare does not make the woman in the poem out to be some sort of goddess. In telling his mistress that he loves her, our speaker also has to give us an idea about what his love is like. He is stating who and what she is, and that at the end of the day, his love is not only beautiful, but unique, exclusive and rare.

During the Shakespearean period love was presented in several different ways. Love was sometimes portrayed as a war between two lovers and sometimes used to profess admiration to a lover. In Sonnet 130, Shakespeare redefined what love poems were, by making his poem a parody of the conventional love poems that were written by poets in the sixteenth to seventeenth century. Prior to this poem, love poems were praised for their romantic appeals where more often than not they praised women for their beauty and god like appearance. This poem was known to be one of Shakespeare’s most famous sonnets because of its central idea that love is not only physical attraction. In the typical love poems women were described to have flawless skin, rosy cheeks and were admired by everyone in their society, while this poem particularly has a different tone to it. It mocks the typical love poems by stating his honest feelings towards his lover.

Sonnets hold more detail and depth than can be easily noted in a first reading. Due to their strict structure and short length, a lot of thought must be put into the words chosen by the poets. Edmund Spenser and William Shakespeare exemplify the idea of sonnet diction being a vital part of the poem. This is especially true in the cases of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130 and Spenser’s Sonnet 64. Both sonnets feature a strong focus on a female beloved and her appearance. The two authors have different approaches in how they describe her looks, but the overall structure of the sonnets are very similar. In both cases, each word in the two sonnets means something more than the word alone first implies.

Sonnet 73 is a meditation on mortality, and yet it can be interpreted in a number of ways. The first such interpretation is that the author of the poem is speaking to someone else about his own death that will inevitably come in the future. This interpretation has the poem focused on the author, and his focus and concern over himself. This makes him seem very selfish, because we are all going to die sooner or later, and it does not do any good to dwell on or complain about it. The only use that this interpretation really has is to evoke pity in the author, or the speaker of the Sonnet.

When you think of a sonnet from Shakespeare’s time, you think of a lovey, mushy poem about how the love the writer has for one. Sonnet 130, written by William Shakespeare, totally goes against the typical sonnets of the time.

William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130, also known from its first line as “My Mistress' Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun”, is a fourteen-line poem in which an unnamed male speaker describes various aspects of his mistress.Sonnet 130 is often taken as a satire of the type of courtly love poetry that was so popular in the late sixteenth century. This is because it draws conclusions that are diametrically opposed to those other pieces of poetry. The Sonnet itself consists of three quatrains and a final rhyming couplet. In these quatrains, the poet compares his nameless mistress to various things such as the light of the sun, to perfume, to music, and to a goddess. Each time the poet points out that his mistress cannot compare to these wonders simply because they are entirely different. Instead, the speakertakes pains to describe what his mistress is really like. These comparisons are quite humorous. But is Sonnet 130 meant to be simply satirical? This paper will explore whether this is the case.