Wilma Waedle Case Study

Husband and wife, Gary and Renna Pehle were infected with HIV at the time they applied for life insurance with Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company. The couple did not know they were infected with HIV at the time. The insurance company ran blood tests from the Pehles. The Pehles then signed a contract form which was given to them by a Farm Bureau agent. A nurse from Farm Bureau watched as the Pehles signed the contract. Blood samples were sent to a third-party laboratory called LabOne. Farm Bureau then sent a notice to the Pehles rejecting them from their life insurance policy, which advised the couple that if they wished to have their application reviewed to contact their physician. The Pehles did not take any action in doing so. Two years past and Renna Pehle is confirmed to have AIDS. The Pehles then sues Farm Bureau, LabOne, and LabOne’s medical director Dr. J. Alexander Lowden for negligence, for failing to tell them they were HIV-positive.

Contrary to the alleged, Dr. Brock refuted the claim, defending that he never established a doctor-patient relationship with Anita, which relieves him of liability. In order to validate his refute, Dr. Brock provided four factual elements that were supported by his counterparts; Dr. Whitfield and Dr. Ketcham. The four elements that were presented in the affidavit included: (1) That there has never been a doctor-patient relationship between Dr. Brock and Anita Oliver, (2) Dr. Brock has never seen or talked to Anita or Cathy Oliver, (3) Dr. Brock was not employed, engaged or requested to serve as a consultant to treat Anita, (4) and Dr. Brock was not employed or engaged to consult with doctors treating Anita, concerning complaints or medical problems. In order to support Dr. Brock’s refute, Dr. Whitfield and Dr. Ketcham provided affidavit’s as

The Department of Human Resources received a report on Ms. Sue Salter on 9/17/14 alleging Ms. Salter a paraplegic who is paralyzed on her left side was living in a home with no water, power, and had an inadequate caregiver. During investigation, utilities were reconnected and Hospice service provided. Hospice stated Ms. Salter was losing notable weight and found lying in urine during visits. Due to this, several bedsores increased and the doctor ordered a catheter and low air mattress. Ms. Harville, the caregiver was educated on wound care numerous times and demonstrated a working knowledge but choose not to administer wound care.

The claimant had 9 physical therapy visits for cervicalgia and low back pain from 01/12/2017 t0 02/01/2017.

On Monday, 11-16-2015 she recalled the claimant had punched in early for work that morning and did not say anything to her until shortly later around mid-morning when the claimant came into her office. She said the claimant was brief with her when she requested to file a Workers’ Compensation claim for her alleged right wrist injury coupled with pain to her right fingers. She claimed that her injury was work-related, and her injury occurred on 11-12-2015.

The patient refused to sign the self pay estimate; because she feels that she should have been contacted before the having the test, and at the point she would not have had the test performed.

Respondent sought compensation from her employer Comcare under the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Commonwealth). It was argued that she suffered injuries during the course of her employment.

This is a brief summary and timeline as to what has occurred prior to the date that I had an injury at Arizona Mills. First, I already had a permanent injury case resolved with ongoing “Approved Awarded” treatments for C-6 and C-7 cervical spinal supportive care treatment for my neck granting four doctors visit with Dr. Patel per year and 12 physical therapy treatments per year for chronic pain that originated in 2008 for my pain. Injured by a student with Autism who also had injured 5 other teachers to date. Since, that injury, the only activity I have involved myself in was substitute teaching in the PUHSD in Phoenix while pursuing my Doctoral Program at GCU or when home in Kingman substituting

I am filing a Title 38 U.S.C. Section 1151 claim because I have incurred or aggravated an illness while participating directly in a Vocational Rehabilitation Training under the provision of Non-Paid Work Experience (NPWE) program. During the month of December 2010 through April 2016 I began working at the Veterans Affairs office at 6437 Garners Ferry Rd, Columbia, SC 29209. The first five years was as a Federal Work-Study, while pursing my Bachelor of Business Administration degree.

By way of background, Fulton County is responsible for a New York State Workers’ Compensation claim, WCB# 50413999 with a date of accident of 10/01/2003. The case has been established for an injury to the neck by Administrative Decision filed on 12/29/2004. A copy of that decision is attached hereto as exhibit A. The case was later amended to include right carpal tunnel syndrome and

That your petitioners like all men according to Locke, are entitled to property and the protection of their property rights through civil government. That no harm comes to another in life, health, liberty, processions (Oufutt,102). That God gave the world the Earth to cultivate and make their own but not to have others bare the fruit of another’s hard labor.

The purpose of this report, is to determine whether or not I should hire Jill for the position of “floating” Administrative Assistant, to work any of the three shifts; day, night, or graveyard when the regular assistant is absent. Jill has been diagnosed with having multiple sclerosis, which is currently in remission. The director of operations is telling me not to hire Jill, because if she becomes ill in the future, her medical condition may impact the firm financially. Jill states, “She is currently not suffering from any symptoms and is able to perform her duties, but will need two hours off monthly from 3:00p.m. to 5:00p.m. to make doctor visits.” Jill never gave the dates she would need off only the time frame. The director’s advisement is based on the firm’s new policy. This policy requires all employees to take a medical exam, after a job offer has been made. The policy was put in place because the firm was having problems, with new hires that they discovered had health problems. As a supervisor I will comply with the director’s directive, while ensuring that all federal guidelines for hiring anyone with a disability are being upheld. This will be being done to avoid the firm receiving any future lawsuits.

Rita Tungare and I attended the annual ICSC Deal Making Trade show at Navy Pier on October 19th and 20th. This is the 4th consecutive year that we have attending the show and the 3rd consecutive year that the City has been an exhibitor of the event. This year’s event was very well attended and we were able to connect with a number of commercial brokers, construction managers, and potential tenants. In my opinion, the most valuable outcomes derived from this event are these conversations and the information we were able to glean. The following is a brief summary of these conversations:

Ms. Walcott is a nurse at WMC for the last three years; she stated that on Tuesday, June 23, 2015 she attended the complainant Ms. Smith who an out-patient was coming in for a procedure.

Past Medical History Mrs. A.’s medical history includes, a diagnosis of emphysema and asthma as a child. Drug allergies include, Sulfa medications causing a rash. The client denies taking any prescription medications but reports taking over-the-counter Tylenol as needed for pain. Reports surgical history of hysterectomy in “1970’s.”