preview

Winners Catcher In The Rye

Good Essays
Open Document

On the contrary to phonies, there are of course winners to this game of life. However, the winners aren’t alway really “winners” especially through Holden’s eyes. On that note, there are many characters in the novel that I would consider we as readers would believe them to be the “winners”. The first character is Stradlater. Stradlater, Holden’s roommate, is the sort of boy that schools like Pencey are made for: good looking, athletic, well-rounded, and above all else, absolutely “normal” (10 Pinsker). Stradlater is destined to become one of the “very Joe Yale - looking guys” whom Holden feels almost obliged to hate, partly as a matter of overcompensation and partly because this is how smooth-talking, terribly sincere-sounding prep school Romeo ends …show more content…

Much like when you lose a game, you move on from it and let it go, Holden lost Jane but he cannot move on from her nor let her go. Moreover, the game of checkers is a big scene that relates the two characters in the story and possesses many symbolizations to who Jane is, or to what Holden believes she is. Jane-as with Holden...has problems with the common sense of competition; she doesn't have a bloodthirsty bone in her checker-moving hand (11 Pinsker). Jane Gallagher's kings in the back row are rather like the purity of snow in winter: white, unsullied, and, in Holden's word, "nice" (11 Pinsker). What Holden fears is that Jane will move her kings out if the back row and that Stradlater will "jump" her, that she will no longer be the sad, virginal girl she once was (12 Pinsker). In the arithmetic of Salinger's symbolism, they suggest an aversion to risk, a need to be protected-for if Jane moves her king onto the playing field of a checker-board, it might, after all, be jumped (11 Pinsker). All in all, the game of checkers symbolizes the innocence and Holden’s fear that if she moves her kings or plays the game, then she will become just another player in the game of

Get Access