Winning The Lottery Research Paper

Total 100% happiness! The fun of the lottery further outweighs the future lack of funds (Beyerstein, 2006). Consequently, an argument AGAINST the ethical existence of the lottery, from the monetized utilitarian point-of-view, is that only one person, or a minimal amount of people, will win, producing an outcome where 99.99% are UNHAPPY. Likewise, the majority of the people who seem to play the lottery are the people themselves who can least afford the luxury (Brusseau,

Being stoned to death by 300 of your friends and family is possibly the worst way anyone would ever want to be killed. In the short story “The Lottery” written by an author Shirley Jackson, she mentions about a small village consisting of 300 residents who most reluctantly participate in an annual lottery drawing. I know, who in their right mind would hesitate to be a part of an event that gives you a possibility of winning a prize, which makes you wonder what the prize is. At the end of the story the protagonist, Mrs. Hutchinson, who also happens to be the winner of the lottery is stoned to death. I argue that Jackson wrote this story to inform us how living in a small community isn’t always a great thing because in a small population people start gossiping about one another, which can lead to issues and could turn into hatred.

First off, winning the lottery may not be a blessing because you can lose your money quicker than you think. After winning the lottery, the government takes almost a quarter of your winnings in taxes to help cover the United States’ debt. If you won about 10 million dollars, the government would take around 2.5 million in taxes. Another way you can

The lottery creates immense happiness for the winners, generating huge amounts of revenue for the few lucky winners, at the expense of every other person that did not win. This goes against the general utilitarian way of thinking, the good of the many out weighs the good of the few (2012 books, n.d.). What makes the lottery so bad is how much wealth it bestows upon so few people, and how many people play thinking they might win, but inevitably lose. This widespread suffering by the many so the few can enjoy more wealth than they can imagine is why the lottery is a utilitarian monster.

Most people think winning the lottery is a dream, but for these seven unlucky lottery winners, their prize was much more tragic. Meet the seven people who won the lottery and continued on to suffer as a result. You won't believe these stories.

Is winning the lottery meant to be fortunate and cherishing? Most would have said of course! However, sadly it is not the reality in this case scenario. In the movies “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and The Hunger Games by Gary Ross having your name being drawn is most likely one of the worst things that could happen in their small town or district. These two movies do have comparisons and differences. Both of these movies have sacrifice and tradition, on the other hand they have two extremely different protagonists known as Katniss and Tessie; which make their stories more on a distinctive perspective. “The Lottery” and The Hunger Games are similar in regards to sacrificing and traditional beliefs, although they differ by the main characters

I believe that the characters in “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson are so willing to stone innocents to death is because they believe that it is for a good purpose. It is very similar to how the subjects of the Milgram experiment were alright – on a moral level – with shocking an innocent for the sake of scientific advancements. The citizens are not being ordered to continue with the lottery – Old Man Warner and Mr. Summers never explicitly say that continuing the lottery out of the question – but the two do imply their support for the lottery and its results. For whatever reason, the citizens genuinely believe that the lottery is worth continuing, despite its direct effects in the deaths of those who were once held dear to them. Similarly to

Winning a large sum of money, such as the lottery, can lead a person into trouble. There are multiple instances where lottery winners are injured or murdered through home invasions and other crimes. Releasing their personal information to the public almost sets a target on their back, which why some states allow winners to claim their prize anonymously.

Can winning the lottery be a bad thing? I think that winning the lottery can be a very bad thing. Most people think that winning the lottery is the best thing that could ever happen to them. It is nice when you don’t have to worry about owing any money, vacations, and being able to afford anything that you would want. Some of few people who win the lottery find out that winning all that money from the lottery is not always a good thing.

Our possibility to win the lottery is slim to none. Nevertheless, the lottery is a game of luck. Gloria C. MacKenzie, an 84-year old widow, was fortunate enough to win the $590 million Powerball lottery in Florida. According to Robert Williams, we are required to spend the majority of our time, money, and life striving to win the lottery. Furthermore, we will have to spend two dollars on tickets eighty-six million times to get our probability of winning the lottery to fifty percent, and because of that, we must ask ourselves if it is worth it.

A lottery winner will begin to feel the need to flaunt their wealth because of their popularity. In result, a lottery winner will start buying flashy things for display and buying others overly expensive gifts to show how wealthy they are. Not considering the cost of their flashy and expensive objects, can cause a lottery winner to lose all their winnings in a matter of time. Therefore, the popularity given to a lottery winner isn’t beneficial because the fame and wealth results into dishonor and debt.

Lotto and casino winners are not produced daily, but when these winners are made and announced, the industry is often treated to wild and unbelievable stories of money, success and frustrations. It is now common to hear sob stories about casino and lottery winners who after winning their millions eventually lost all of their money. And for some ‘unlucky players’ they end up wasting their winnings on new vices like wine, women and cars, and a few to some disgruntled relatives. But not all stories end up this way- there are some refreshing stories about casino and lottery winners that are worth knowing and sharing.

The book Lottery is a great book that shows you how money can change your life and the people around you. In my opinion the question of this book will be: Does money change people or people change for the money? There are lot of situations and lots of points of view in this book that will make you think and will make you see how money sometimes changes people and sometimes not. In this book, Perry Grandal wins the Lottery, he doesn’t change during the book, he follows his ideas and his thoughts, he keeps his job and continuous with his life, for him the money is just something that makes his life easier since he doesn’t have to worry for having enough: “-Don’t be smart-

I am the same way of about thinking if I could only win the lottery all the things I would be able to do. Paying off student loans to start with ha-ha, along with other bills I have accumulated. Then I have seen interviews with people who have won the lottery and some of them say it had ruined their lives. Although I still buy lottery tickets figuring I will take my chances, when in reality the chances of me ever winning are slim to none.

NO. Lottery winners are not happier according to an article that CNN did. The article said that winners of the lottery are in more debt than before they won the lottery. In addition, winners of lottery are more antisocial than before the lottery because everyone wants to borrow money. In my opinion, I feel it would be hard to know if a person is being genuine or pretending to be a friend to get money from them. Although, many dream about how awesome winning the lottery would be, sadley, many lottery winners end up broke and alone with no social life.