Women Are More Emotional Than Men

Miller, Alice H. Eagly, and Marcia C. Linn, it measured gender-science stereotype, “” (2). which is defined as associations that connects science with men more than women. This is believed to come from a lack of representation of women in the relative field. The study notes that putting women in science related fields in media, or having more women in the field, lessons that stereotype. They conducted the experiment by measuring 66 nations, which consisted of 350,000 participants’ explicit and implicit gender-science stereotypes. They found a relationship “between women's representation in science and national gender-science stereotype” (Eagly, Linn, Miller 8). The results of the study concluded that “implicit and explicit measures indicated strong association of science with man” (Eagly, Linn, Miller

Science, technology, engineering, and math are the four areas of study that make up STEM. These four areas all have one thing in common: they are all dominated by men. According to Lauren C. Williams, “men outnumber women 7 to 3 in tech jobs in New York City — and nationwide.”.7 Despite this, “women now earn more bachelor’s and master’s degrees than men”.6 However, “women are a minority”.2 Women are a minority in all STEM careers. The ratio of men to women in scientific fields has never been one to one. For some unknown reason very few women are choosing to become chemists, physicists, engineers, computer technicians, or mathematicians. There are many proposed theories for why women are extremely outnumbered in these scientific

We are exposed to various emotions everyday, whether it is at work, at school, on the street, or even at home. An emotion could be described as an individual’s reaction to an event, in which that individual is aware of his/her own feeling. There are two types of emotions, positive and negative. Positive emotions could include feelings such as love, joy, and bliss. Negative emotions could include feelings like fear, anger, and anxiety. Social psychologists are under the impression that negative emotions are stronger than positive emotions. Emotions have physiological as well as mental components. This means that there is some form of arousal and thinking involved. Now that we know a little about emotions, one might ask, what are the basic

As per research ‘gender’ provides a perspective from which one could examine the biases that exist in the larger society. Some believe that to arrive at a more eloquent understanding of the problems of women in science , one should begin by asking what is the nature of science space that leads to under-representation and marginalisation of women rather than questioning the situation of a woman’s life that makes it difficult for her to pursue science.

This concept illustrates gender inequality because even in a field that is dominated by women, gender perceptions about men’s roles, abilities, and skills, privilege them and ease their advancement within the occupation. (Wingfield, p363-365)

Although the recent upward trends in the number of women in STEM fields are promising, they are not truly due to decreasing cultural stereotypes. Women receiving graduate degrees in engineering increased by 2 percent from 2000 to 2008, but this trend is not as hopeful as it may seem (Giges). This increase was mainly evident in communal fields like environmental or biomedical engineering (Giges). This is further evidence of the impact of cultural stereotypes and their influence on women’s career paths. Society’s expectation of women is that they serve as caring motherly figures and community-centered careers adhere

Being a woman in the sciences has already proven to be a struggle in some aspects. For instance, guys often double check my work or do not take me seriously because “girls don’t do science”. It makes it hard to feel confident in what I do and its sad that men often get all the credit. Shetterly’s story reiterated to me even more how men are those recognized, and even though the events of Hidden Figures were many decades ago, the same phenomenon persists

The stated prerogative is to introduce slow yet lasting change and to integrate more women and people of color within the STEM field; however, the plan for change, and the reason for its perceived need to be slow is nowhere addressed; , suggesting that it is rather the reluctance of men to relinquish control and allow feminization of the field (Tepperman and Curtis, 2012). Reports of these initiatives claim to be struggling struggle in attracting and keeping women within the STEM field. Yet by shifting the blame on women, the inaction taken by scientific institutions to reform the patriarchal ideals dominating the scientific realm is justified (Tepperman and Curtis, 2012). In addition, the economic paradigm that western society is built around is one that necessitates inequality to function. The Neoliberal welfare is instrumental in constructing gender

In addition, there exists an unconscious bias that science and math are typically “male” fields, while arts and hospitalities are primarily “female” fields.

One of the most debated topics of this century, or arguably history, is the idea of sexism and its implications on gender roles in society. Sexism is defined as a prejudice or wrong mindset, usually under a negative connotation, of a member of the opposite sex. It usually constrains and limits the actions of the individual or group that the prejudice is being inflicted on - in this case women. It has not been a secret in society that females are often on the low end of the stick when it comes to jobs, societal perception, or even capabilities. In the workplace, they are often perceived to be inferior to males in true academic worth, which is one of the reasons that a majority of the jobs that specialize in the arts, such as journalism or photography, often are female prevalent (Sinkele, C. N. and others, 2011). Females who do manage to make it into the high paying STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) fields, often make noticeably less than their male counterparts. Women are also thought of to be weaker, more emotional, and less ambitious than males; they are often constrained to traditional gender roles of obedient housewives in countries such as India or Pakistan. Nevertheless, many disagree with the concept of sexism in general and argue that many supposed assumptions imposed on females are legit, and therefore make the argument that sexism is unrealistic. Arguments have been made on if sexism even exists in some circumstances; those opposing the concept of

Since the beginning of human history there has been inequality between the sexes. Even though scientifically there is no assigned roles in both genders, humans have created the expectations of a perfect male and female. Throughout American history we have been able to conquer the boundaries of science, and mess with the balance of nature. You’d think that a country that thrives in science, would acknowledge the fact that your gender doesn’t determine who you should be, but we do. Most of the social standards that we have created are unfavorable to women. Social standards have prohibited the growth of women in the career fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.

Women have developed on many aspects of life. Nevertheless, gender stereotype still lives among us. Women scientist and politician face more challenges than their men with the same career. They are further critiqued on their physical and emotions in addition to their intelligence. Our culture still lacks to fully accept the equality of men and women. It is often seen than women experts are not as praised or paid as men with the same level of expertise. This creates negative psychological repression and reduces the motivation to achieve

Henry David Thoreau once said, “Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined.” While this advice is encouraging, it becomes concerning when the history of science is studied. In the 17th and 18th centuries, science was heavily dominated by men, discouraging many women from succeeding in their goals. These women were not necessarily allowed to travel in the “direction of their dreams,” but rather back to the kitchen. The few women, however, who did attempt to achieve their scientific goals paved a way from future women in fields of science. A few of these women are seen in The Mind Has No Sex? (Schiebinger) and How can a little girl like you teach a big class of men? (Weisstein). These women, and their trades,

Engineering is a field dominated by men in today's society, for many reasons. When people think about engineering they think about men with glasses and never does a women come to mind. However, there have been many studies on the skills that keep women out of engineering as a career yet there is no proof that women cannot or do not possess the skills needed to be a successful engineer. Therefore, it is thought and stereotyped that women do not have the skills to have an engineering career. Due to the studies and stereotypes the questions then arise as to what makes a good engineer. Many have the same response to the question but not one skill can a women not posses. Women are stereotyped as being dumb just because they are pretty. If a

Implicit biases refer to a series of terms related with unconscious prejudiced judgment and attitude. Previous studies showed people’s behaviours may be influenced by implicit biases (Moss-Racusin, Dovidio, Brescoll, Graham & Handelsman, 2012), as well as the way people perceive and evaluate others (Michael, 2016). In long history, a number of evidences showed that women were in a disadvantage situation in science. For example, women were often undervalued like having poor scientific ability, and hardly got a scientific job compared to male peers (Steinpreis, Anders and Ritzke, 1999). Even though nowadays there was an obvious decreasing tendency on gender bias resulted of the education of gender difference and equality (Moss-Racusin et al., 2012), women were still disadvantaged in academic recruitment and promotion. For instance, there was not obvious change on the percentage of women workers, although the number of whole workers significantly increased (Nielsen, 2016). Thus, investigating the question whether there is a difference in evaluation with a clear gender shown may be helpful to future academic evaluation and gender equality.