Women 's Army Auxiliary Corps

Although women should be fighting in front line in the military many believe they should not. More than 200,000 position will still be remain exclusive to men. women won 't be able to qualify for jobs. “They are not going to be able to meet those standards” (Women in the Military: Why Can 't We Serve on the Front Lines). The weapon use in the front line are too dangerous. “women will not be able to handle the big

Historically, military service and fighting in combat have only been available to men, but recently there has been debate about women serving in military combat. In times of war in the United States, men have generally fought as soldiers while women in the

After World War I a few ladies came back to the spot society had bound for them while others can 't. They had adapted new abilities and was readied to utilize them. The United States entered the World War II after the shelling of Pearl Harbor and ladies control again was popular. Their parts kept on evolving immensely. By the spring of 1942 there was a developing labor deficiency in the military. In American Wars before World War II, there had been a level headed discussion about and restriction to utilizing ladies as a part of the military. As men went off to fight, ladies were required for non-battle employments, for example, switchboard administrators, telegraphers, mechanics, and drivers. Amid World War II, more than one hundred thousand ladies served in the women’s Army Corps later got to be known as the Women’s Army Corps. Ladies additionally joined the United States Navy. Amid the fall of 1942, the Women’s Auxiliary Air Squadron got to be known as the Women’s Air Force, started preparing ladies pilots who flew planes to different army installations in the United States. They tried airplane and performed other non-battle flight obligations. Numerous ladies trusted that they may never be permitted to serve in the military again on the off chance that they didn 't turn out to be skilled in a picked part.

Women and war have always been considered to have little in common. As the gentle sex, women are traditionally associated with the care and creation of life rather than with its destruction. However, over the past twenty years, women have increasingly served, and continue to serve, with valor and integrity in the Unites States Armed Forces (Kamarack, 2015). Although women have successfully proved themselves in the military, they should be restricted from entering into direct combat because they are less physically fit than their male counterparts, create animosity on front lines, and undermine cohesion within a military unit.

It was 1941, before the United States was involved in World War II, Ovata Hobby was asked by General David Searles to organize the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps. When Hobby first received the offer, she wanted to decline the offer but would ultimately take and develop into a part of history that will never be forgotten (Collins, 4). These great women that served in the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) that made a monumental impact during and after the war through their patriotism, hard work, and dedication.

During World War I the United States Navy and Marine Corps began allowing women to enlist. Over 12,000 women enlisted and more than 400 of them gave their live to fight for freedom. Women have taken an active role in the military starting in the Revolutionary War. The first female ever recorded to serve was Deborah Gannett who in 1782 used her brother’ name to enlist. After being shot, she removed the musket ball from her own thigh so the doctor would not discover her gender. Women in the military increase significantly in World War II with more than 351, 000 served. In fact the stateside Marine Corps Headquarters 85% of personnel was females. By 1991, women were allowed to serve in integrated units with in warzones. Even though women were prohibited from serving in units engaged in direct ground combat, in 2005 and 2008 two women were awarded the Silver Star for exceptional valor in close-quarters combat. As of 2013, there are close to 970,000 women who are enlisted and active or are serving as reservist.

Women are vital to the stability and efficiency of all branches of the United States armed forces. Although women’s presence may be necessary to the operation of the military, their placement in combat positions would prove to be a devastating mistake. The body of a woman is not made to brave combat positions, and placing women into positions dominated by men could create a hostile working environment. The atmosphere of battle is already heated, and placing more problems into the equation could lead to the unraveling of military effectiveness as the country knows it. Consequently, women should continued to be excluded from combat oriented positions in order to preserve the superb work of the United States armed forces.

(Women’s Army Corps). The Women’s Army Corps did not pass into law for a year after it was introduced and it became into law because of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The women gained their official status and salary but they still were treated unfairly because they did not get equal pay or benefits like the men did. Women Corps performed variety of jobs such as, clerk, radio operator, electricians and aircraft controller. The women later on got veteran benefits and were a total of 16,000 women army corps.

Some argue that women should not serve in combat because; they have never served in any type of combat operations in the history of the American military. Positions in the military have been designed specifically for women and how they perform their duties. No evidence can be produced that women have the abilities, physical strength, or motivation to engage in combat operations, the physical differences from their male counterparts are so extreme; women cannot maintain the agility or psychological confidence that men are capable of displaying during extreme combat stress.

Women are very skilled at these jobs, and help the country in many ways that we can’t imagine. But the one thing that is stirring up arguments across the country, is should women in the U.S. military engage in combat? Women across the country argue that women should be given the equal rights and opportunities in the military and in combat situations. Although many

Women have been in the United States Army since 1775. Although women have been in the military since 1775, that doesn’t mean they have had a real military job. The women in the United States Army had jobs such as cleaning, cooking, doing the male soldiers clothes. The United States female soldier didn’t began to have a real armed forces job until the 20th century. According to Historynewsnetwork.org, since 2001, around 280,000 women have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan

June 12, 1948, the United States of America Government enacted the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act, which in effect women allowed to hold a permanent position in the USA’s armed forces, because the significant and vital role they played in the previous wars. However, a part of this law limited the amount of women who can serve and the rank they can achieve, and prohibited them from serving in direct combat units because that Congress believed women did not possess the physical quality needed in these units. This law is known as the Ground Combat Exclusion Policy. Although over time a few of these restriction have been removed, such as the amount of women who serve and the rank they can achieve, in the present day women still cannot serve in the direct combat units. In this essay I will show you why this ban on women should be lifted.

The United States Military is the strongest of its kind of this planet. Several countries dream to have the firepower and loyalty that the United States has acquired since its infancy. Although the military is the most powerful, one issue which has been heavily debated as early as the 1920's is, “do women belong in the military?” Women have been fighting, bleeding, and dying for our country since the revolutionary war and have shown how capable they are in several military disputes . Women have turned the tides of history for the greater good. Women deserve to be treated as equals in the military, but should be excluded from groups which need the most effective and physically fit soldiers possible.

This is because different individuals hold varied opinions and views on the issue. There are about 16 countries in the world which allow women to participate in combat roles .This paper is going to discuss why women should be allowed to serve in military combat. Women should be allowed in the military combat because they can complete the same physical tasks as men with proper training. This is because women have been able to successfully accomplish tasks that have been perceived in the past as preserve for men.

After years of discussion and debate it appears that soon women will be sent into combat operations in the United States military. This is the way it should be because women are ready and competent to be put into combat roles in the U.S. military. Indeed, slowly but surely, the Defense Department and Congress have been inching towards a decision that will formalize the policy; in fact the National Defense Authorization Act, put before Congress in May, 2012 by U.S. Senators John McCain and Carl Levin will in effect order the military "…to come up with a plan to send women into battle" (McAuliff, 2012). Hopes are high that this will be approved by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama.