Women's Equal Opportunities In The Military

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

Only men are required to actually sign up for the draft after turning 18 years old.

Women have served the military in one fashion or another since the Revolutionary War, in recent years the status of women serving in the military has changed dramatically. Traditionally women have always served in administrative or medical roles. With the advancement of views and the sheer determination of many women, we are seeing women serving in combat and fighting alongside their male counterparts. Training schools such as the Army Ranger school, Marine Infantry training, and pilot training within the Navy and Air Force have opened and began training women to fight. The history of some accomplishments women have made while serving in the military has paved the way for the future of women soldiers to follow.

ecretary Panetta 's decision to repeal the Department of Defense policy preventing women from serving in direct ground combat units opened Pandora 's box. We have since witnessed a fierce debate over whether women should be allowed to serve in specialties previously opened to males only. The media promptly rushed to side with those contending that all direct ground combat jobs should be open to women, suggesting that women proven had themselves on a "nonlinear" battlefield, where there were no distinguishable front and rear lines. Furthermore, many have rallied behind those women who have been able to demonstrate superior physical abilities, such as the two women soldiers that recently completed Ranger School. I would submit in line with the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces that neither accomplishment demonstrates that these women or women in general are the "best-qualified and most capable" to serve in direct ground combat arms specialties. This issue is not about what women should be allowed to do, it 's really about what are they capable of doing. The bias is not institutional, the bias is physiological.

Many countries such as Israel and Russia have allowed women to serve in combat roles in the military; however, this has not always been true in the United States. Throughout history, women have had an active role in war time. The United States has documented cases of women disguising themselves as men in order to participate in combat as far back as the Civil War. It would seem that women have as much desire to serve as men, but in what capacity? This is a question that not only the United States has struggled with, but is a continuing debate around the world. Today, we see many more opportunities for women to fully serve with their male counterparts in countries like Israel and Russia. The United States has conducted research into the effectiveness of expanding the role of women into combat. Women have proven that they are able to withstand the demands of military life and the United States Army recently had two female Army Rangers graduate. But to understand where we are now, we must look back on how this increased confidence in females in the Service began. Possibly, the greatest and most visible contributions were during World War II.

Today I will be talking about women’s rights. Seeing a female taking leadership is so empowering. Women should have the same opportunities as men

When you think of the military, you don’t really think of women in the military. It’s a very controversial topic of women in the military. Some people despise the thought of a Female in the military, and other people, like me, really could care less. There are a lot of mini topics within this topic that makes this so controversial. One of the more common ones is, Women don’t get the same benefits as men get, and they are forbidden to engage in combat. Witch in my opinion makes no sense. They choose to be in the army, and they knew what that meant for them and for their families, so I say let them experience everything that being in the military entails. There are some very horrifying things that can happen to women, one that might not even

When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.

Introduction/Objective: Women serving in combat positions has been a highly controversial topic and is openly criticized by many. The push for equality by allowing women to serve in combat positions is not just isolated to a few military branches of service. Secretary Carter stated, “For the first time in U.S. military history, as long as they qualify and meet specific standards, women will be able to contribute to the Defense Department mission with no barriers at all in their way.” (Pellerin, 2016). Based on the Secretary’s recommendation, women will be eligible for all positions to include roles in combat. Senior leaders noted that this will provide a better selection of candidates, therefore increasing the quality of the selection process, (Commander Call Topics, 2015). The leading idea behind gender neutrality is to improve the military’s position regarding well-qualified personnel in key positions, (Commander Call Topics, 2015). This integration is supported through equal opportunity for everyone who inspires to serve their country. The standards will remain the same, therefore women will need to pass the same requirements as their male counterparts, (Commander Call Topics, 2015).

Over the course of time, the military has gradually allowed women to take part in wars, starting off as nurses or spies. Eventually, women were granted the right to fight on the battlefields alongside men. According to a 2014 study, by Gender Roles, many opposed the thought of women being accepted into the military. Surveys show that the average woman enlisted in the military, navy, air force or marines are about 5 inches shorter than their male counterpart and women’s upper body strength is half of a male’s; also having 37% less muscle mass. (1) Although some people may oppose allowing women to serve in front line

In spite of their record as able combat personnel, there are laws and policies that restrict women in the United States Military from serving in positions that require them to engage in direct combat. Women in the Air Force and Navy are barred from aircraft and vessels that have a chance to be exposed to combat. The official, established policies of the Army and Marine Corps exclude women from combat (Snyder, pg. 75-76). These policies prohibit women, on the basis of gender only, from over twelve percent of the skill positions and thirty-nine percent of the total positions offered by the Department of Defense. Such policies excluding women from combat need to be repealed by Congress.

Women in the military have a history that expanse over 400 years into the past. Women have played many roles in the military, from ancient warrior to the women that are serving today. Some women served the military as nurses and helpers; however some did become involved in battles. Back in the civil war a few of them disguised themselves as men and took part in the combat. Racism and ethnic discrimination in this world has been a major issue. For the women in America, equality is still an illusion; whether you are in a work place or a military base. According to the U.S constitution all humans were created equally, that include men and women. And I believe that a woman job in the military is just as capable as any man. Some people will argue

A majority of this essay has been based on the negatives that need to be improved to reach gender equality. However, a positive aspect to women working in a military setting is the equal pay, something many jobs don't have to offer. “Surprisingly, there is one employer who pays everyone equally, regardless of gender: Uncle Sam. The structure of the U.S. government, and especially the military, addresses the common factors that perpetuate the gender gap in the private sector” (Hammons). Military jobs are equally payed and only different by rank instead of gender. Many companies and workplaces should put this type of system in place for their workers. Small things like equal paychecks will ultimately lead up to gender equality for a better America.

Women have fought alongside men in the United States Military in every major battle since the American Revolution. The roles of women in the military have evolved over time to allow the incorporation of women in expanding military career fields. Women have proven themselves to be an asset to the military despite some of society believing women would weaken America’s military effectiveness. Today more than 200,000 women are active-duty military, this is about 14.5% of all military. Currently, women are involved in all branches of the Armed Forces; there are around 74,000 women in the Army, 62,000 in the Air Force, 53,000 in the Navy, and 14,000 in the Marine Corps (By the numbers: Women in the U.S. Military). Military women continue to

The armed forces are the ones who protect and serve our country. Back then the military, the navy, and the air force had one thing in common—they only recruited the men to serve and protect. Now over time women were finally allowed to serve along sides the men, but not without putting a fight about being equal in the armed forces. The author Rosalind Chait Barnett, who is a scientist and a director and the Brandeis University, wrote the article “Women and Work: Where Are We, Where Did We Come From, and Where Are We Going?” which talks about the past of of only the women being oppressed. Martha McSally, who is a professor at the George C. Marshall European Center and is also retired from the U.S. Air Force, wrote the article “Defending America in Mixed Company: Gender in the U.S. Armed Forces” in which she talks about the topic of inequality as a whole. Lastly, Andrew Tilghman, who is the editor for Navy Times and Marine Corps Times and was also the Pentagon bureau chief, wrote the article “All combat jobs open to women in the military” which talks about the issue of being a woman in the military. All of these authors help support the idea of genders in the military and their successes and well as their struggles. Barnett helps both McSally and Tilghman as they try and prove that gender equality should exist in the military.