Women's Rights By Susan B Anthony Analysis

Changing social values: The values of societies change over time. Society is forever changing values which then place’s pressure onto the law to change and adapt over time. What is seen as as acceptable may not be considered acceptable at another time. The urge for tougher sentencing in law reform may satisfy the deserved aspects of punishment, but harsher penalties are not statistically shown to reduce crime rates. Thus in seeking to promote social values for tougher penalties it undermines our social value for fairness and the concept of justice for the individual.

The United States of America is a country priding itself on providing equal opportunity for the right of life, liberty, and property. These unalienable rights, according to the Founding Fathers, were not to be taken away or denied by the American government. Also known as a natural right, the right to life can be classified as a citizen’s right to be protected by the government from abuse or death. Property classifies the right that a citizen has for owning materialistic items and land for which can be considered private. Finally, the right of liberty presented in the Constitution for a citizen refers to many different aspects ranging from freedom of speech and expression, right to bear arms, freedom of religion, freedom against search and

”Unjust law is no law at all.” In face of unjust laws, merely tolerance and obeying could be detrimental not only to personal rights but also to the well-being of the society. Therefore, it is indeed every people’s responsibility to disobey or even resist them. As we know during the sixties of America a number of citizens decided not to obey the law which itself is unjust and wrong any longer. Without their resistance, there wouldn’t have been the civil rights movement, anti-war

rights to not be harmed or discriminated by other people. One protects us from violence and

The Declaration of Rights of Women was a speech in which the National Woman Suffrage Association declared their freedom on July 4th, 1876 because they have no voice or representation in government. Anthony, like Stanton spoke about the “many forms of flagrant discrimination” women faced politically tries to their argument around 1776. Anthony talks about “the broad principles of human rights proclaimed in 1776, not only as abstract truths but as the corner stones of the republic” that these rights aren’t only for half of the population, but these natural rights are given to everyone, regardless of gender. Lastly, Anthony believes that disregarding these rights will only set a bad precedent for the future of the republic, setting its own demise.

The speech “ Women's Rights to the Suffrage” by Susan B. Anthony was to persuade AMerica that it is illegal to not let women vote. The speech is most compelling because she use allusion to show everyone that she is right.

“Western countries value the individual above society; in Asia, he said, the good of society is deemed more important than individual liberties” (179). In “Times to Assert American Values” and in “Rough Justice” by Alejandro Reyes, different nations punish crimes in America. After carefully analyzing the two texts, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has most relevant and sufficient evidence to support it because of the way the author uses important details to support the claim.

If he does have the right, and if this right has been violated, is a remedy necessary?

As Americans, we are taught that we have our basic rights from the time we first go to school. Over time, we have been given more rights than in the past. In simpler terms, we have more rights today than we did yesterday, and we will have more rights tomorrow than we have today. In the world, there has been many events that have helped or hindered the impact of our rights. Life first begins with our civil rights and liberties. As our civil rights and liberties are publicized and opinionized on media, the public begins to have a perception of certain government agency’s actions. Then, on a higher level we also should remember people’s political stance and what values and/or morals they hold. How Americans are given their rights is an ongoing debate; however, there are no rights and wrongs just consequences that follow each action.

Society has a need for quality and equal justice along with protection for everyone and the process of how to effectively implement such a thing has been an issue for many years. Focusing on the problems of society incorporates methods of trying to fix it from political measures to law enforcement measures. The combined effort of the two brings out the issue of what method should be used to dominate the problems. Looking at

The idea of natural rights, in contrast to the previous one, refers to the existence of the

Because the resolution evaluates the justness of presuming consent, my value for this round is Justice, defined as giving each individual what they deserve. Since everyone is due natural rights, my value criterion for this debate shall be to maximize natural rights. William Wainwright of American Philosophy Quarterly writes in 1967 that natural rights include the right to life, and the right to liberty, because each person has equal moral value. Everyone deserves the right to life if they are morally equal, and everyone is due liberty since it provides meaning to life, by allowing each person to reason on his or her own.

Everybody has a voice. Whether they use it for their own benefit or for the mere purpose of helping the public, it is crucial to dispute for what you believe in since it may improve the qualities of your surroundings thus leading you to not change your perspective of a granted situation.

in terms of human rights, “human rights are grounded in human dignity” (Van Duffel, 2013, p.

Justice is the first virtue of social institutions and every person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override. In a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests.