Words Students In Specific Schools

Des Moines is an important case for free speech in the United States. It affirms that students don’t lose their rights when they go to school. However, it also affirmed that schools can limit speech that “materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others” (Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969). However, the Court has ruled that there are times that the school can limit speech. In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled in Bethel v. Fraser that students can be disciplined for using vulgar and offensive language in school (Gooden, Eckes, Mead, McNeal, & Torres, 2013, p. 25). This case differed from Tinker v. Des Moines because that case was about political speech or expression. Another example of where school can limit the First Amendment is school sponsored newspapers. This was affirmed by the Court in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). That decision stated that schools can reasonably limit the content of school-sponsored newspapers (Gooden, Eckes, Mead, McNeal, & Torres, 2013, p.

After, Kourtney Friar evaluates her daily habits and she finds that she uses an excessive amount of profanity. Profanities also known as swear words, cuss words, bad words, cursing, taboo etc. Profanity can be a word, expression, gesture, or other social behavior which is socially constructed or interpreted as insulting, rude or bad-mannered, or violating or showing disrespect toward an object of religious veneration. Profanity affected an individual usually in childhood, along with many other social issues. As children, people are punished by parents when they use profanity, and at that stage most learned that certain phrases must be avoided. When people grow older and mature, we learn the difficult social features and challenges that are faced cause people to use profanity.

Benjamin Franklin once said, “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” Indeed, free speech is a large block upon which this nation was first constructed, and remains a hard staple of America today; and in few places is that freedom more often utilized than on a college campus. However, there are limitations to our constitutional liberties on campus and they, most frequently, manifest themselves in the form of free speech zones, hate speech and poor university policy. Most school codes are designed to protect students, protect educators and to promote a stable, non-disruptive and non-threatening learning environment. However, students’ verbal freedom

Despite that students now use profanity in their public schools and even more out of school, this could cause more children and teens to use the offensive language around their peers.

A second reason why schools should limit students’ online speech is because it can disrupt school activities. For example, in Doc. D( J.S v. Blue

Imagine yourself in a world where you could not say what you wanted, or express how you feel. Everyday thoughts that are said out loud like, “Man, this lesson is dumb” were no longer permitted to be anything other than thoughts. Many people in other countries have rules and regulations on what they can and cannot say. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution gives Americans the right to free speech (Lakoff 260). Learning to speak is something our parents praise us for when we are little. Why, after all the waiting time they endured, would parents let strangers decide what their child could or could not say. Censorship of language and speech is becoming too strict.

language is vulgar, lewd, and demeaning. As of 2015, all states in the United States, except for

Although the First Amendment is not that vague, schools have struggled to define what its limits are for the past 40 years. One may argue that a student’s Freedom of Speech should not be limited because of our First Amendment rights, the fact that so many schools struggle to define their limits and that they all have different limits, also, limiting a student’s Freedom of Speech brings totalitarianism to schools.

Just like many places of employment, schools too have the right to censor and filter the content that is being associated with them. Some schools choose to find uniformity by having a dress code or uniform policy while others have policies in place. However, these rules are all in place

Start with the word _________________ and call on students to share what they thought was this word meant and how they figured it out using the context clues. Mention the importance of the words around the unknown word; stressing a don’t-give-up attitude.

In the pursuit of education, students strive to learn and develop their understanding of the world that surrounds them. Accordingly, it is the responsibility of the school administration to provide the means to that end. Yet, there is a polarized divide among schools and their interpretation of freedom of speech. This occurrence is experienced primarily at the university level but can be seen at all levels of education. At the epicenter of this dispute is the notion of censorship, specifically whether or not it is feasible to restrict what can and cannot be said by faculty and students alike. Advocates of freedom of speech assert that censorship violates our First Amendment right, a liberty that is inalienable. Proponents also argue that

Our most basic right, the freedom of speech, is being threatened. Nat Hentoff’s “Speech Codes on Campus” clearly explains the situation unfolding on college campuses and elsewhere across the United States. A speech code is defined as a limitation on specific words that might be found offensive to anyone. This limitation can create some major problems elsewhere that can be overlooked. Some might even argue that speech codes offend the very people that it is trying to protect.

The reason is that the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause requires courts and school districts to weigh and balance two forceful ideas that occasionally clash: The need for a safe, orderly school environment conducive to learning. The guaranteed American entitlement to speak or engage in expressive activity. Some states have passed laws empowering school boards to regulate student dress. For instance, Tennessee has a law allowing school boards to pass

How much consumable paper does our school use in one week? To me this question is asking in one week how much paper, in Downers Grove North High School, is produced and used over the course of 5 days. If I had to guess I would say we use about 1,035 pieces of paper are used in one week. I arrived at this estimate because I multiplied 21 (what I thought was the # of papers per class) by 5 (# of days in school week). Which came out to be 105 (Total # of papers 1 class uses in one day.) Then I multiplied that number by 7 (Typical # of classes in a day.) Then reached the number 735. I figured that number was too low, so I added an extra 300 for passes, posters and etc. The answer then came out to be 1,035. The obvious constraints to this problem

As an educator, it is extremely important to know educational policies. On top of the knowledge, it is also imperative to respect the rights granted to students in the democratic society. Attached above is an article, published by the first amendment center, regarding how the first amendment is employed within public schools. The first topic in the article is titled speaking out in school. Here I learned that the school cannot limit the student’s freedom of speech, unless it is hindering the environment to learn, and even then, there is a lot of grey area. Here the school must be able to provide substantial evidence that the student’s writing, speech, or expression would cause great disruption. This also ties directly into school dress code and uniforms required by the school corporation. Students, in many