Work Mandating Public Service Analysis

Some people suggest that everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should be required to perform one year of community or government service. Such service might include the Peace Corps, Environmental Conservancy Corps, a hospital, the military, a rural or inner-city school, or other community outreach projects. I believe forcing the service of any group of people is a bad idea. In this case, three reasons come to mind as to what makes this idea bad. First, I see this as a form of indentured servitude, even though the folks may earn a paycheck. Second, I feel that this idea takes away from the idea of the United States being a free place to live. And third, much like the idea

When a good service becomes mandatory, it loses the effect it had originally. In Volunteering to Graduate: Do We Need More Requirements? by Miriam Dodge, the author makes an important point about community service. “... making a selfless

Paired with all the controversy over current immigration laws, renowned political scientist, Robert Putnam, released a study showing, “...the more diverse a community is, the less people care about and engage with that community. Diversity, in fact, seems to breed distrust and disengagement (Stengel).” Americans are so divided among racial, partisan, and economic bounds that the integrating forces of public service seem necessary. Perhaps instead of perceiving themselves as self-serving individuals, assuming a role in a mission much larger than themselves would humble and enlighten them (Daily Pennsylvania cite this correctly). National Service should become a country-wide rite of passage for young people. They should give contribute to the community as they transition to adulthood and become a functioning entity within it. The service should promote patriotism and an interest in the service as an enlightened nation (Stengel). Everyone should do something for their country, everyone should be proud to be an American. The freedoms and liberties that are hand-in-hand with living in America the beautiful are taken for granted and their roots forgotten. Magnificent sacrifices have been made for this country. Is it too much to ask for a

Public prosecutors, accounting specialists, military personnel and law enforcement officials are just a few of the public services jobs filled by voluntary citizens from all walks of life, but what if a two year service of this kind was mandatory for all high school graduates? It could be said that this would bolster public services with an influx of personnel to provide a more robust service. Would the reasons to implement this type of service outweigh the consequences though? I don’t believe so. In fact, I believe that compulsory public service would only cause complications for the military, increase government spending and would be a direct violation of the Thirteenth amendment.

My project relates to the course objectives twelve and seven this is because it talks about inclusion, in which all types of diversity are respected, appreciated, and valued in America. As well as the vital role of the people in creating and maintaining a society through voluntarism and civic engagement, a role that can complement and replace the role of the government ensuring the well-being of society. Civic engagement involves “working to form a distinction at intervals the civic life of one’s community and developing the combination of information, skills, values and motivation to form that distinction. It suggests that promoting the quality of life throughout a community, through every political and non-political process” (Erlich, 2000). Civic engagement includes every paid and unpaid style of political policy, environmentalism, and community and repair. Volunteering is one kind of civic engagement. many of the nation’s volunteers unit youngsters. over 0.5 (59 percent) of teenagers at intervals the u. s. according that they participated in youth volunteer add 2009, in line with the Corporation for National and Community Service (2010). Most youth volunteers do so out of selflessness Associate in Nursing interest in making throughout a distinction at intervals the lives of others, in line with one survey. Exclusively five take advantage of students reportedly volunteered due to a school demand (Corporation for National and Community Service, 2005

Mandatory service does more harm than good, and it goes against being free in the U.S.A.. No one should every be forced to do any service for any reason. Furthermore, the very statement of "mandatory service" goes against our constitutional rights as free citizens.

Should public-service workers have the right to strike? After all, they are humans that work jobs and deserve a fair amount for their services. But, what would happen if there were no police around nor firefighters to do their job? Things would obviously be a mess. You have to weigh these options and figure out which one is more important. Should we make public-service workers do their jobs even if they are working under a poor conditions or hardly getting paid to feed their families, or should we let them strike over their own benefits and let the area become a complete wasteland? I am here to say that public-service workers should not have the right to strike for more benefits.

Imagine you are going to graduate from a school. You and your friends are all excited and happy... until you hear some news that you had to do a 'task', that isn't important for school, in order to graduate. Let's say that 'task' is Community Service. I believe we shouldn't have to do Community Service because we need to study, finish our homework, and do after school activities.

The United States' idea of requiring citizens ages 18 - 30 to complete one year of service is a good idea, but being forced to do it, isn't right. We have freedom for a reason, we the people volunteer for ideas like this.

If I have learned anything about public service since I started at the Clinton School, is it that the definition of public service is fluid, and the professors want us to be continually rewriting our own version of its definition. Confusion urges us to continually rethink what we already (think we) know; ‘public service’ is not immune to this confusion. For the longest time, I didn’t feel the need to have an actual, concrete definition of public service. I was of the thought that I could adopt for my definition of public service the Supreme Court’s Justice Potter Stewart’s view of obscenity

The world is a big and at times scary place, and throwing teens right into college is not the best idea. The average age of kids graduating high school is eighteen and the world they are entering can be extremely overwhelming. Mandatory service would give these kids time to grow up a little before entering college, and learn life skills that will better prepare them for their upcoming experience. This is all backed up by Karen M. Whitney, Ph.D. who have over thirty years experience working with higher education students, she is also the President of Clarion University. She states in one of her past articles that “My experience is that all things being equal, 20-year-olds make better college students than 18-year-olds. A two year assignment to national service could instill a sense of purpose and relevance that is often missing from the lives of 18- and 19-year-olds”.

While requiring high school students to complete a service requirement seems like it would be beneficial to society, it could actually be doing more harm than good. Part of the philosophy behind mandatory service for students is that the exposure to the needy and the act of helping the community will foster an enjoyment for service that will motivate students to stay involved following their high school careers. For example, one high school in Manhattan states that, “Community service must be harnessed to foster a sense of community in a school, a neighborhood, and beyond” (The Dalton School). In theory, this sounds appealing. In additional to all the service students give during high school, if they kept it up later in life, America would have no shortage of people willing to make their communities better. Unfortunately, forcing students to do service work does not make them do more service in

Firefighters, police officers, public officials, and health care personnel are some of the first careers individuals think of when the phrase, “public service,” is mentioned. Other people think of philanthropists, teachers, or even nonprofit organizations; however, individuals in these positions are not the only public servants throughout the world; and in some instances, the same individuals who serve as your police officers, public officials, or in any “public servant” position, for that matter, would not be considered a public servant due to bad outcomes from unethical behaviors. The real questions, then, are: how to determine the public official that is, in fact, a public servant compared to the one who is not; how to know what other jobs could be considered a public service and which ones are not; or how to recognize the actual acts of public service from the phony ones? Questions like these, as well as others, will be attempted to be answered in this paper, or at least provide a framework to answer them through the attempt of clarifying what the definition of public service incorporates into its jurisdiction.

Becoming so firmly planted in one definition of service people tend to ignore its other uses.  A strong attachment to one definition or another can be attributed to working as a lifeguard or work with other programs like YouVote.  With YouVote, participants are helping and benefitting others by providing them with information important to upcoming elections.  By providing people with information it helps them along their way to making an educated decision when they vote.  Working with YouVote has helped to extend the definition of service to all persons who help or serve others like; waitresses, teachers, lifeguards, doctors, lawyers, coaches, and the government.  The government continuously provides "service" to our country, or at least they try.  The many readings in WRA135 class have shown the government needs to provide more service to those in need like all those living below the poverty line and/or on

Volunteering: The great experience no one can afford to lose. Opposers say, mandatory community service can have several negative effects on students. “Community service hours are impressive additions to college applications and can provide a student with a great sense of accomplishment; however, the mandatory hours will have many negative consequences” (Cydney Hayes, 2012). Many students are barely even passing the regular school curriculum, and opposers believe that adding the additional load of mandatory service hours will discourage teens from even wanting to graduate. Also mandatory service is usually assigned by a court as punishment to delinquents. “In a small number of cases, community service is