Work-Product Doctrine

1.16 (A).1, 5.5(B) - Upon learning that Carl had taken on a case on his own, which is an example of unauthorized practice of law, Attorney Howe should have notified the clients that Carl did not have such authority to take on a case, set discounted fees or conduct an interview without Attorney Howe’s supervision, thus in good consciousness Attorney Howe cannot take on clients under fraudulent circumstances.

The stage 4 mathematics Unit of Work (UoW) “Unit 10 Measurement, Length, Perimeter and Area” implements an array of concepts to aid the students to learn multidimensional mathematics through applying an Aboriginal perspective. These concepts that are outlined are the choice of and conversion between metric units, establishing and using formulae to solve perimeter and areas of squares, rectangles and triangles, utilising pi and solving perimeters of circles and solving problems using perimeter, area and circumference. Although the unit mentions the importance of the use the Mathematics problem solving there is a majority of content that is missing on the cultural aspect of mathematics as it highlights the prominent use of one-dimensional Mathematics.

Can a party use the work product doctrine to protect trial exhibits at a pretrial conference?

(2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;

The foundation of modern right to counsel through court-appointed attorneys at the expense of the government for an indigent defendant accused of a serious crime was made possible by the ruling in a U.S. Supreme Court landmark case, the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).

The Sixth Amendment’s clause on counsel assistance has also been challenged in regards to the right to an effective performance on the count of the attorney. This concept demonstrates that the fulfillment of the right extends further than just the mere appointment of legal defense.

Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 122 S. Ct. 1237, 152 L. Ed. 2d 291 (2002)

In making its decision, the trial court relied heavily upon Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Muillin Richter & Hampton (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 658 where the Court of Appeal previously held that claims based upon allegations made by attorneys in judicial filings were within the scope of the anti-SLAPP statute and protected.

Subsequently, in 1972 Argersinger v. Hamlin held that defendants were required legal counsel when faced with incarceration from a misdemeanor or felony conviction (Smith, 2004). Following these Supreme Court decisions, most state and local governments had to develop new systems of indigent defense or modify the old ones to keep up with the number of clients (Wice, 2005). Since Gideon v. Wainwright, other cases have challenged the Supreme Court application of the right to counsel. Currently, all defendants are given the right to counsel at all stages of the criminal justice process, including during trial, appeals, and even during police interrogation.

The St. Mary’s Center v. Hicks case created national storm after the Supreme Court decision that an employee must provide evidence and prove discrimination in the workplace. To demonstrate discrimination, an employee must conform under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Cundiff, & Chaitovitz, 1994). Justice Scalia labeled Saint Mary’s Center v. Hicks case “pretext-plus” approach. Other courts, commentators, and analysts originally also classified the term pretext-plus. The approach of this case is similar to “pretext-only” approach from the case McDonnell Douglas Corp v. Green of 1973 (Cundiff, & Chaitovitz, 1994). The employee must develop a discrimination case and accepted as correct and proved

     Once the discovery process is completed, the Enlisting of Experts process is required. The plaintiff early in the pre-trial process to determine whether he has a viable claim must obtain this expert. The defendant will also obtain an expert to support the defendant’s theory of the case and refute the plaintiff’s expert. After sufficient discovery has been made and experts are in place, either party may move for summary judgment. If the material at hand shows that there is no genuine issue as to a material fact, the court may rule and motion that there is no need for a formal trial. When either party

The primary source of the right to counsel is the Sixth Amendment. It states in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for defence. In this article, the development of the right to council will be discussed as well as when the right to council attaches to criminal procedures. The right to self- representation and the role of attorneys as it applies to right to council will be discussed as well.

Attorney Client Privilege, which originated in Roman and canon law, has evolved into a recognized judicial doctrine and is necessary in order to provide clients with access to effective, well informed counsel. In Upjohn Co. v US the Supreme Court the Court

It is an inevitability of the adversarial litigation system of the commonwealth, that the question of privilege should arise regarding the documents declared and produced during proceedings. In the context of civil litigation, privilege refers to the ability to withhold specified documents (despite disclosing them) on relevant legal grounds such as the Evidence Act, Civil Procedure Act, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) and common law. This essay shall explore the quite unique public policy basis for privilege and in particular consider the requirements for assessing this privilege as well as the constant battle between the preservation of public policy and smooth litigation proceedings.

Schemes of Work (SoW) refer to guidelines designed to make the teaching of subjects more manageable. They provide supporting information about planning and teaching the subjects and form important documentary evidence about course delivery. However, SoW are also extremely flexible teaching guides that can be moulded to take account of local teaching needs and resources. There is no set method for developing schemes. Colleges that responded to requests for information whilst researching this article approached SoW in their own way. All were agreed on the importance of accurate schemes to guide subject delivery. One respondent compared SoW to a ?road map of a journey?. Many colleges incorporate the need to develop and make