Essay about World War II

Later, it was proven that the USSR was correct in pushing for a trial to occur. If the United States had continued its argument to not to go through with the trial, it would jeopardize the values that the country was built on. The trials began with a 24,000 word indictment, taking nearly two days to read (Levinson 578). Each of the men was tried on four counts, conspiracy to wage aggressive war, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity (Levinson 578), by a set of judges and jury that represented each of the Allied countries (fix citation). By having a fair and just trial, it gives the court the power to show that every human, no matter what the crime, has the right to a fair trial and that justice would eventually be served. By exercising the justice system, it also allowed the public to view the magnitude of the crimes committed by the men, and the level of involvement that each of them had in Nazi activity.

After the brutal event of the Holocaust the people that committed the crime had to be punished. The allies of the war and Germany came together to punish the Axis criminals of the war. Many trials took place in many places around the world to punish the Axis war criminals.

During your lifetime, have you ever wanted to bring someone to justice for something bad that they had done? The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials held between 1945 and 1949 in which the Allies prosecuted German military leaders, political officials, industrialists, and financiers for the crimes they had committed during World War II. The Nazis who participated in doing those terrible things to the Jews were brought to justice. Most of them were executed for the sickening crimes they commited. The Nuremberg Trials were a significant aspect of the Holocaust because this event was held for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice.

The Nuremberg Trials article says that, the defendants, Nazi Party officials, high ranking military officers along with German industrialists, lawyers and doctors, were indicated on charges such as crimes against peace and crimes against humanity (“Nuremberg Trials” US history). The Nuremberg trials are now trials regarded as a milestone toward the establishment of a permanent international court, and an important precedent for dealing with later instances of genocide and other crimes (“The Nuremberg Trials”). The Nuremberg Trials is a general name for two sets of trials of Nazis involved in crimes committed during the Holocaust of World War II. The first, and most famous, began on November 20,1945. It was entitled the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which tried the most important leadership of Nazi Germany. The defendants in the Main Nuremberg Trial were found guilty, sentenced to death, and were hanged(“The Defendants”). The second set of trials, for lesser war criminals, was under control Council Law No. 10, at the US Nuremberg Military

It is a pleasant autumn day in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1960. Suddenly, agents from Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad, tackled a man to the ground (Lichtblau, The Nazis Next Door 68). Unbeknownst to spectators, that man was Adolf Eichmann, aide to the Fascist dictator Adolf Hitler. Along with Hitler and other Third Reich Nazis, he had organized the Holocaust—a massive genocide murdering eleven million people. How is it possible that, after all of these years, Eichmann remained hidden? How is it possible that the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, which were held by the Allied Powers after World War II, did not execute this man? The Nuremberg Trials were a series of thirteen trials held between 1945 and 1949 to prosecute some Nazi war criminals. The trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany, because its courthouse was not damaged from the war. The four Allied Powers held the hearings, and the best-known trial was the Trial of Major War Criminals (“Nuremberg Trials”). The fact of the matter is that not many Nazis were actually convicted in the Nuremberg Trials, even though these court proceedings were supposed to bring Nazis to justice. Overall, the Nuremberg Trials were not effective in prosecuting Nazi war criminals. This is because few Nazis were executed, many fled to South America, the U.S. enlisted them as spies, and they became top scientists in the United States Space Program.

The tribunal prosecuted and tried high ranking Nazi officials for “crimes against humanity,” which included persecution on racial, religious or political grounds as well as inhumane acts committed against civilians (including genocide). After the Nuremburg trials exposed the horrific magnitude of the Nazis crimes, the U.N. General Assembly approved a resolution in 1946 making the crime of genocide punishable under international

Between 1945 and 1949, about twenty-four major Nazi criminals were tried in Nuremberg, Germany for the four indictments, participation in a common plan for crimes against peace, waging and planning wars of aggression and other crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, though the most important trials were held between November 20th 1945 and October 1st, 1946. Those held after were so-called “lesser war crimes.” Within the trials, there were judges trials, which consisted of sixteen jurists, lawyers, nine Reich Ministry of Justice, prosecutors, judges of special courts, and the People's Court of Germany. These trials lasted from March 5th to December 4th, 1947. Throughout this time ten were found guilty, four were sentenced to life in prison, and four were acquitted of all charges. Throughout all of the judges trials, most of the prisoners were released in the early 1950s for illness, or on retirement pensions.

German prosecutors have investigated 106,000 suspects, but only 6,500 were only found guilty and sentenced. There has been a lot of debate on whether or not to prosecute Nazis that carried out Hitler's orders on killing, and harming during the time span of 1939-1945.Former Nazis killed and tortured over 6 million Jews, also most men and women who participated in harming Jews during the Holocaust have not been punished for their crimes.

When first establishing the Nuremburg IMT and before any legal action could be taken against the accused there were several legal and technical complications to overcome first. The first problem encountered by the Allies was the fact that there had never before been a precedent for an international trial of war criminals. Of course, there had been earlier instances of war crimes, but these trials were conducted not on an international level rather they were conducted according to the laws of one nation as opposed to various nations. However, in the case of the Nuremberg trials four nations Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States all of whom had different legal practices were included in this international wartime trial. In order to remedy this problematic concern, the allies created the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal on August 8th, 1945 which greatly aided in establishing the legal basis for conducting the trials of high-ranking Nazi officials whom had been accused of committing “war crimes, crimes against the peace, and crimes against humanity” during the duration of the war (Hallock 128). It is without denial that the Nuremberg trials played a pivotal role in the formation of international politics. The London Charter became the first ever document of its kind as it established the boundaries and practices that would be followed during international war crime hearings for decades to come. In addition, the Nuremberg trials have had countless impacts on international law as this is where the term “crimes against humanity” were given a definitive legal classification. For the first time in human history individual rights and their being subject to law was established, in a region which only previously acknowledged the rights of States.

The Nuremberg trials, occurring from November 1945 to October 1946, were crucial in appointing responsibility for the war crimes and crimes against humanity conducted by Germany while under the rule of Hitler and the Nazi Party. Two dozen of the most notable political and military leaders were tried during the Nuremberg trials with a considerable amount resulting in execution. Despite continual efforts to shift blame to higher ranking officers and claims of general unawareness, most Nazi war criminals, specifically Wilhelm Frick, Herman Goering, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, and Otto Ohlendorf, who claimed to have been unaware of the persecution and mass murder of the Jews were found guilty of being involved with the Holocaust with evidence

Since this definition was established, it became much easier to convict the accused Nazi’s for their crimes, as convicting war criminals with a valid definition in the first place is crucial. The purpose of the Nuremberg trials was to find and convict the Nazi participants in the war for what they had done. The Nuremberg Trials did not take too long to complete, taking only 10 months between November 20th, 1945, to October 1st, 1946. This was mainly only because Germany was very strict on consistent and accurate documentation about the crimes- unknowing at the time, that they had committed; which made it easier to persuade the accused to admit to what they had done. These documents included the robbery against Jewish people, such as rings, paintings and other valuables.2 Because of the weighted proof of thousands of documents, twelve of the twenty-two initially accused Nazi’s were sentenced to death, three were acquitted, and the last seven were sentenced to prison.3 The Nuremberg trials were a big step towards establishing human rights internationally and made it known that both civilians and prisoners of war are entitled to protection despite any circumstances. The trials were the first in history that war criminals from around the world were tried in an international court for their crimes.4 Furthermore, it pushed the agenda that war crimes were not to be dismissed so

The consequential winners of The Second World War decided that Germany's war leaders should take their appropriate blame for having caused severe damage to the injured states as documented in the Holocaust. However, these specificities occurred after WWI. Already paying generously for their invasion, even more Nazi leaders received punishment. The victorious powers contemplated what repercussions would be fair towards the persons who created the world's fear of the Nazi individuals. In November 1985 the world’s first International trials, the Nuremberg Trials, began. These trials concerning Nazi leaders’ punishment included the prosecution of 13 Nazi

First, the laws which were applied to the trials were mainly established after the war. The trials were done under the Charter of the International Military Tribunal but this was made just before trials to judge Nazi. Prosecutors applied them retroactively in the trials, but retroactive application of laws discredited the legitimacy of trials because

The series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany was a milestone in establishing a form of international justice as well as an international court of law. In these trials specifically, it was held to indict Nazi Party officials and high ranking officers for their crimes against humanity during World War II. The four superpowers at the time, USA, France, Britain, and Russia came together, even though each had their justice system and litigation. The idea behind the Nuremberg Trials was to constitute a platform in order to bring individuals who acted in extreme violence against civilian population and violated human rights through times of war. However, at the time, there existed no true definition of a war criminal and what defines

During the Holocaust nearly 17 million people died, 6 million of those were people of Jewish descent. After World War II, many Nazi soldiers and officers were prosecuted. Today, about 80 years later, they are still being prosecuted. Although some may say that these murderous maniacs shouldn’t be prosecuted, but these criminals deserve to be punished for their crimes against humanity.