freedom to be ignorant about those who are not white and freedom to deny the ignorance. In the movie, there were several blue-eyes students who argued back to Elliott. Even when Elliott dismissed them to discourage speaking, they were adamant about expressing their opinions, anger, and discomfort with Elliott’s workshop. This behaviour showed that they were raised with the freedom to talk about their feelings and their distress. It also demonstrated that they were never penalized for self-expressions and never had to deal with the consequences that followed speaking up for themselves. Their behaviours were indications that majority of the white people had the privilege to defend themselves without risking their access to education, jobs, and …show more content…
In the beginning of the experiment, Elliot talks about how we use the word “boy” to keep men to their childlike state. She, then, constantly refers to blue-eyes students as “boy” or “fool” during her workshop. This was an interesting moment for me because I did not realize that language can be such a powerful mechanism to diminish one’s self-esteem. By taking away a person’s name, their identity and individuality are also taken away. It indirectly indicates that the person holds little importance and that them as an individual human being is not respected. In my case, the idea that my teachers did not remember my name or did not show any effort to remember my name was such an internalized idea that I did not even make its connection to oppression. This film made me see that I should not regard such situations as natural and recognize that it is another form of discrimination. The language not only took away the identity, but it also emphasizes who is the norm and who are the minorities. Elliott divided the two groups and referred to them as Browns or non-Browns. This was a clever parallel to how people of colour are called in society. In places where white is a majority, other races are classified as non-whites. Different races are all clumped into one group. This minimizes the appreciation for each distinct race, but also reinforces the idea that the society is organized with
These children are trying to assimilate in a way that allows them to still be individuals of their culture, but other do not see it as such. In the movie the class is learning about racism one day and they are discussing the achievement gap. The statistics that are presented to them give them an even stronger drive to succeed and assimilate to beat the statistics. Still people, like Tom Horne, call the classes racist because they are not mixed with the american based way that he
I will analyze the data by looking for a trend in the amount of fish caught in the morning vs at noon.
This story has affected me in a few ways. One of the ways was how children think and see the world. One of the ways is how children see and picture racial equality. They do this in a way that many adults are not readily capable of doing, or choose not to. From the story early on we are told of a girl named Kesha who distinguishes beyond the socio-typical distinctions of black and white, when she states, “‘Okay, peach with spots for you and brown without spots for me, except his one and this one on my cheek”’ (Paley, pg. 15). In another part in the story, the author says two children, Jeremy and Martha, playing a game of Guess Who? Jeremey asked
Students will carefully observe acts of aggression and prosocial behavior on television, report their observations, and analyze their data to draw conclusions.
Levittown project was taken up in the U.S. after the end of Second World War, with the aim of providing mass housing facilities to people in the wake of increasing urbanization and problems of accommodating large population in limited urban area (Friedman. 1995). The first of Levittown apartments were constructed on Long Island, New York and they symbolized the modern trends of urbanization and housing developments (Clapson. 2003). This paper shall study the impact of Levittown project on trends of further urbanization and analyze the aesthetics of design and development involved in it.
Honestly, I was not in the experiment but in one point I felt like crying from all that yelling and scramming that professor Jane Elliot did to the participants. I think that thoughts shifted for some of the participants when they started to feel bad after professor Jane Elliot was saying to them. At one point in the film the participants actually believed that they were wordless and stupid and that’s where the thoughts shifted. The resistances of the adult participants happened because they did not want to believe that were bad and racisms. Personally, I was expecting that reaction from them since we tend to see ourselves most of the time as good people and not as bad people. I believe that they struggle with complying with the rules/expectations because it is something new for them. As society, when we experience something new we tend to have difficulties adjusting to it and that’s what I believed happened to the participants in this experiment. The division between whites and blacks in the film was not enough since we are living in this country where we have not only white and black people anymore. In the United States we are blessed to be able to have a very diverse country, since we have people from different nationality, religions and cultures. I would have rather see a more diverse group of people in this
It demonstrates that even without juridical discrimination; hate speech, lowered expectations, and dismissive behavior can have devastating effects on achievement. Black members of the blue-eyed group forcefully remind whites that they undergo similar stresses, not just for a few hours in a controlled experiment, but every day of their lives. Although these concepts are food for thought… they are merely preludes to the main course. The most important lesson to be learned here is that just one person can make a difference. Next we join a group of 40 teachers, police, school administrators and social workers in Kansas City - blacks, Hispanics, whites, women and men.
On April 5 1968 Jane Elliot preformed the historical experiment in her 3rd grade classroom separating blue-eyed and brown-eyed children. After the death of Martin Luther King her students raised quiestions and she wanted to think of a way to make her students understand what minorities in the U.S feel like. Jane believed that her students would understand what it felt like to be discriminated against by separating them by their eye color. She asked her students if they wanted to be treated like a person of color for a day, judging their peers by the color of their eyes. The students went along with it and that coined the experiment that would later be known as “A Class Divided”.
Elliott gave an excellent example of prejudice and discrimination to her 3rd grade pupils. She split her class in two groups according to their eye color. She set up the rules since the beginning, where the blue eyes group was superior to the brown eyes group and uses a color collar to make the inferior team more visible. It is heartbreaking to see little kids discriminating against each other within that little time and being mean to their friends. Also we see that the kids who were appraised performed better on their tests and work in general. Elliott repeated the exercise to the employees of the Iowa prison system. The reaction to the employees was similar to the 3rd grade kids. They started to prejudice and discriminate
Race and gender are two facets that inherently dominate individuals everyday lives. A person’s social environment, work environment, and educational environment is congruent to their race and gender. From birth, it has been set up that everyone is assigned to a label. A pink or blue blanket is swaddled around a newborn child and a box is checked signifying that child’s place in society. These two actions ultimately define how a child is to be viewed and treated. As children grow into young adults they either decide to stick with their original assignment, while others decide to deviate from it. These individuals deviation results in many of them being viewed harshly and looked down upon because they strayed from their social norms. This constant cycle of being classified and labeled from birth is the social institution of gender and race. These social institutions aid in the inequality that is present in society, and race and gender are shaped by this. However, if these social institutions were removed, race and gender could dissipate. This is due to the fact that race and gender are not real, but are socially constructed concepts used to organize the power, or dominance, within our society to one social group over the other groups.
The emotional reaction that the filmmakers intended for anyone who watch this film is that no matter what skin, hair and eye color is no one deserves to be labeled. No race should be discriminated and criticize. We should all get along and just be proud of where our roots come from. This film also intended for everyone who watch this film, is that there should not have to be obstacles to be proud of your own race.
The route the children are designated to take, in addition, is specified in the writing to inspire in the audience fear. The segregated school for Black students is located within a mass of railroad tracks, warehouses, and red-light districts, all notably dangerous locations for children to be in. By specifically mentioning that Ellison had “forbidden words” added to his vocabulary, he implies that he had interacted with the many unsavory individuals in the area to the extent of learning immoral materials or skills (Ellison 4433). This emotional appeal enforces the idea that impressionable children are innocent and that their actions were forced upon them by the adults in control. It also appeals to the parental instinct to protect children and preserve their future. By being forced to maintain continuous exposure to dangerous environments and professions of ambiguous morality, the Black children are victims of tarnishing and possible injury by the White authority purposefully segregating the children to hazardous areas. The strategy in specifying the unfortunate circumstances the African American children are facing is for causing the White adults to appear as villains who impose professionals of socially denigrated on innocent children. In contrast, Ellison, despite not doing anything particularly virtuous, is designated the ‘hero’ to be cheered for along with all his associates and peers, who are also victims.
Each and every person on this Earth today has an identity. Over the years, each individual creates their identity through past experiences, family, race, and many other factors. Race, which continues to cause problems in today’s world, places individuals into certain categories. Based on their race, people are designated to be part of a larger, or group identity instead of being viewed as a person with a unique identity. Throughout Richard Wright’s Black Boy, Richard is on a search for his true identity. Throughout Black Boy, one can see that Richard’s racial background assigns him with a certain identity or a certain way in which some
Elliott Erwitt is a street photographer born in Paris from Russian immigrant parents (Erwitt, 2011). This essay will not focus on his biography but rather put emphasis on his work. Elliott Erwitt is known for his spontaneity when taking snapshot and passion for the human condition (Magnum Photos, 2011). He also has a very sharp sense of humor that is without a doubt reflected on his work. Elliott Erwitt has also a particular affinity for dogs and kids (Erwitt, 2011). It is said that the challenge is to be able to recognize the work of a particular photographer based on specific characteristics distinctive to him (Magnum Photos, 2011). As a matter of fact, Elliott Erwitt’s snapshots all have distinguishing
Everyone is likely to experience some form of discrimination or prejudice; as is anyone capable of acting prejudiced towards others. On April 5th, 1968, a teacher in Riceville, Iowa named Jane Elliot conducted an experiment with her third grade class that dealt with the concept of discrimination; and was documented in Peters’ 1985 ‘A Class Divided’. The exercise originally took place the day after Martin Luther King was assassinated. The documentary is an eye opener to the world of racism and discrimination. Bucher (2010) describes racism as “discrimination based on the belief that one race is superior to another” (97). According to Bucher (2010) “discrimination is defined as the