Write An Essay On Kant's Weapon

There is very little question as to what action a strict deontologist would do in the scenario for this assignment he or she would unequivocally adhere to his or her duty. The more pressing question, of course, revolves around just where that duty lies. For a deontologist, that duty would lie with the job at hand and its responsibilities. As one who took an oath to only program software in accordance to the company that he or she works for which is essentially operating as an extension of the government that wishes the programmer to 'push the button' and destroy millions of innocent lives in World War II it would strongly appear that such an individuals would consider it his or her duty to effectively start World War III.

Immanuel Kant, a supporter of capital punishment, offered us of the most complicated, if not ambiguous, views on the subject. In fact, he would’ve ironically disagreed with its modern proponents. Those who advocate capital punishment today often do so for utilitarian reasons. For example, the death sentence would protect society by not only preventing a purpertrator from committing the same crime again, it would also deter others by setting an example. Kant would’ve argued the rights of the condemned are being trampled; by using him as an example, we are using him as a means to an end. A rational being, in Kant’s view, is an end in himself, whether criminal or law-abiding

Lying the one form of communication that is the untruth expressed to be the truth. Immanuel Kant states that lying is morally wrong in all possible ways. His hatred for lying has made him “just assumed that anyone who lied would be operating with a maxim like this: tell a lie so as to gain some benefit.”(Landau,pp.171) This is true for a vast number of people, they will lie in order to gain a certain benefit from the lie rather than the truth.It is similar to if you play a game of truth or dare, some rather pick a dare because it would release them from having to tell the truth. However, those who do pick truth still have a chance to lie to cover up the absolute truth.People lie in order to cover who they truly are. Even if you lie to benefit someone or something else, it would not matter to Kant because he does not care for the consequences. If you lie but have a good intention it is not the same for Kant, he would argue that you still lied no matter the consequence that a lie is a lie. “ While lying, we accuse others for not being transparent. While being hypocrites ourselves, we expect others to be sincere.” (Dehghani,Ethics) We know how it feels to be lied to by a person, so in order to not have the feeling returned, we hope the person will be truthful. We rather be surrounded by truthful people constantly despite all the lies that some people tell. No

Paul Hockey is an amputee. He climbed Everest in 2005. Paul only has one arm but he still drives a motorcycle and has many black belts. Paul climbed Everest because he wanted a real challenge. He never thought he would ever climb, but when he decided, he knew he could do it. He trained for Everest by carrying 25 kilos of books up and down his road, which was a hill, every other day. When he climbed Everest he spent 2 months on the mountain until failing 280 feet from the summit. But he didn't give up. He came back and reached the summit June fifth, 2005. He spent thirty minutes up on the summit. Paul lives by his motto, “Never give up, never ever give up”. Paul Hockey connects to the main idea because he was able to climb even though he has one arm, he knew he could do it. Paul made it to the top and didn't give up. He conquered himself.

His essay has many modern aspects. He expected that his efforts would be disregarded by those in power, those who decide to make war. In his preface, Kant wrote (1795, p. 85) that “The practical politician assumes the attitude of looking down with great self-satisfaction on the political theorist as a pedant whose empty ideas in no way threaten the security of the state”.

is the good will. A good will is good in itself, not just for what it

Kant believes that humans are “rational beings, capable of reasoning and deserving of respect”. According to page 360, “treating a person with respect means treating them as rational agents capable of making their own free choices, responsible for their own actions. To justly punish a person is to acknowledge their status as responsible agents deserving of respect. Executing a murderer is not an affront to human dignity but a recognition of it”. By punishing the criminal, we are respecting his beliefs, because we are treating him in the way that he thinks people ought to be treated. We are not punishing him due to our own beliefs, but because it is in accordance with the principles that he has endorsed through his own actions. If someone makes a choice to murder someone, they also make the choice to accept the consequences of that action.

Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”. A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person’s actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by

Disregarding these cases, from the understanding of the judicial standpoint Kant believes one must be punished for the murder of another human being by means of taking their life, as seen in the quote above. Kant argues one imposes their will on another individual when they take that individual’s life. Due to this fact, to justly punish one who committed murder, the judicial system must impose on one’s will in the same manner as they did their victim’s will. Moreover, Kant argues killing a murder must be done to protect the greater good of humanity. Furthermore, to Kant, this punishment of a murder is consistent with his belief every human being is an autonomous being. He argues one who wills the amoral action which is not accordance with the

Although a lot of time had passed since Plato, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Kant, and Marx made a large contribution in the society, modern society still has been hugely influence by them.

When enduring a situation where a disability is prevelant to ones notion to live is always a touchy subject. However, I do agree with the the fact that if you tell someone they can't do something for so long, they will start to believe it. I was amazed that he could do all of those things too, rock climb, horse back ride, and even ride a bike. I'm a fan of horses and even ridden some, so I know the difficulties involved. Therefore, this story actually did impact my perspective on certain disabilities. I will continue to give high expectations to everyone around me, and I will not be bias toward

But one man stands for the rest of the other disabled people, here he is showing the world that one cannot be measured by his or her disability, but his or her perseverance.

"The Enlightenment was a desire for human affairs to be guided by rationality than by faith, superstition, or revelation; a belief in the power of human reason to change society and liberate the individual from the restraints of custom or arbitrary authority; all backed up by a world view increasingly validated by science rather than by religion or tradition." (Outram 1995)

a dress - which does not in fact suit her - just to make her feel

Immanuel Kant was born on April 22, 1724 in Konigsberg, East Prussia. He was the son of a saddler. At age 8, he entered the Collegium Fredericianum, a Latin school, where he remained for 8 1/2 years and studied the classics. He then entered the University of Konigsberg in 1740 to study philosophy, mathematics, and physics. The death of his father halted his university career so he became a private tutor. In 1755, he returned to Konigsburg where he later resumed his studies. In 1756, he received a degree and was made a lecturer, and in 1770 he became a professor.