Writing An Article On Wikipedia Essay

Wikipedia is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly research, the kind, which I will be utilizing throughout the rest of my MBA program. I will be evaluating Wikipedia based on the parameters set forth by Brenda Spatt. The credentials, Impartiality, style/tone, and currency of Wikipedia will all be examined in this paper (Spatt 2011).

In the article, Purdy talks about how Wikipedia’s articles are constantly changing, which makes Wikipedia hard to cited. If one was to cited something from Wikipedia’s information could have changed since that

As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.

When we synthesize, we are trying to put together material from two or more sources to help us to develop new outlook or to emphasize a new context to help us to determine what we are trying to say. Our mission as a writer is to gather as much information as we can on our topic then gather all the information that is going to help us to support what we are writing about (The Norton Field Guide to Writing). “When you synthesize, you group similar bits of information together, looking for patterns or themes or trends and trying to identify the key points” (457) Enclosed are some guidelines for doing so: (The Norton Field Guide to Writing) Read all the sources with an open mind. Take notes and write a brief summary. Pay attention to your first

In the article “Wikipedia as a Site of Knowledge Production,” author Danah Boyd writes about how educators are against using Wikipedia as a quality source. She goes into detail about how most students are told to stay clear of the site at all cost because their teachers think it is misleading and inaccurate. On the contrary, Boyd mentions that analysis have shown Wikipedia’s content as creditable as, if not more reliable than, traditional resources. She also writes about some of the sites features that people don’t know about like there discussion boards. Wikipedia has had time to mature over the years and should be seen as a reliable and should be used in schools.

Eventhough, the internet can be helpful with education, it can also be unreliable. However, “The Hive” by Marchall Poe, was the openness of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that anyone can use it. This might work for some people specially that ones who attend school or college. This is very helpful for them because in Wikipedia you can search or find anything you would like. Since anyone can write, or delete or use information off of Wikipedia, it makes it less controversial because anyone can put their input into the website. If don’t agree with something, that’s alright because you can add your own opinion. Poe describes how authors of certain wiki pages write with a bias to support their facts. Facts become opinions when feelings and emotions of bias get involved. “Instead of relying on experts to

Cheerleading began for me at the age of twelve. In the past I had played soccer, basketball, softball, did ballet. Basically every activity my mom could possibly put me in. All of those activities were okay, but cheerleading became something that was special to me. I first began cheering in middle school for the Hazelwood West Junior Wildcats. I cheered on the team throughout middle school literally dedicating all of my free time to cheerleading. I lived, ate, and dreamed cheer. I went on to continue cheering throughout my high school career, cheering for all Hazelwood West athletics, including: soccer, football, basketball, and wrestling. I was a hardcore dedicated athlete, and I had spirit like no other. From

Gathering all the facts necessary to write an essay is not as challenging as it used to be before the Internet and it’s putting our intellectual

Discussions between users and editors also take place to ensure the quality and correct information is being published. Wikipedia does realize that work does get by them from time to time and admits that some of the work is complete nonsense. They do not want their work to be used for crucial information but rather to familiarize oneself with a new topic. New ways of governing the website are constantly being explored to improve the overall quality of the work being shared. Ultimately it is the users responsibility to double check information with other sources when needing to find out and use significant information. It has been a very helpful tool throughout the years to find information quickly and is generally a dependable way of finding out new

In this paper I will be discussing the debate between pro Wikipedia’s Dwight Reed, and Rachel R. Wright, and con Wikipedia’s Nicole Irwin, Michelle Douglas, and Ivy Leigh. During the debate between Learning Team B members we debated over different points of views regarding Wikipedia as a reliable source.

While people usually run to news stations and webpages looking for information, they can be fraught with inaccuracies. Not at the very least because there are a number of websites such as the Onion, Empire News, and the National Report claiming news stories that are designed for satire. However even bigger news outlets that are legitimate have been known to print, report, or post inaccurate material. This is because some news outlets have agendas and like the .org sites can skew their information to sway the public opinion. Normally this happens when news outlets will report only a portion of the story and will have analysts who are there to give their opinions on the event verses what happened. To ensure that you are not rewriting inaccuracies and bias, make sure you are supplementing any research with factual information that will come from a reliable source. You can also check other major news outlets, possibly ones with conflicting opinions like CNN or Fox news, and see what information matches. An example would be something like a riot. If your paper is talking about rising riots in America it is possible to use a news article that talks about a recent riot that took place in the United States. However, I might avoid their opinions over the riot itself. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Please be sure to thank a vet and remember all that have been lost this weekend.

The NPR Link on whether or not we have less sympathy for people facing things we have overcome was a very interesting concept. After listening to the clip I was surprised and intrigued. I thought as individuals we would have more sympathy and empathy for individuals facing things we have overcome, but the NPR link gives a great argument on how we would actually have less sympathy. In the NPR Link one of the things they said was how an individual is more likely to think that if they could get through a particular situation, so can other individuals facing the same situation. They also state that trauma doesn’t make us kinder or more compassionate, but it does have the potential to make us tougher and harsher. Both of these statements

Wikipedia has existed since January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia written and edited by volunteers. Murley states that as of March 2008, Wikipedia contained more than nine million articles, of which two million were in English. More than 75,000 contributors write in more than 250 languages. (2010, p. 594) However, any one can edit an existing article by clicking on the edit tab found at the top of an article. Only anonymous registered users add new articles. These articles must meet Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. All references must be verifiable and the tone must be neutral. If the article does not meet all of the criteria, Wikipedia’s

The Wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with Internet connection write and edits its articles. Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched their creation in 2001 giving an opportunity to all willing people to work together to develop a common resource of knowledge. Many people have different believes and ideas about Wikipedia, therefore, some tend to think of it as a credible and valid source of information, others strongly disagree. “Since all the books and articles have been chosen for publication, each one has presumably undergone some form of selection and review” (Spatt, 2011, “p.”339-340). Unfortunately, this statement is simply not enough to

E-learning has come to dominate the strategic thinking of employers over the past decade in several countries. Only in recent years in India, there has been focus on e-learning, this is due to the recent development in MNC, BPO and IT concerns. This is widely seen due to the connected economy, become intangible and fast growing among organizations. Due to emerging MNC’s, globalisation has become one of the most important criteria to increase flexibility of communications, and hence become vital among the organization. Despite the emphasis on e-learning and large investments made on training it is still not clear and ongoing success have not yet been recognized, due to the ongoing structural changes among managements. The problem in