preview

Writing As Resistance: Bearing Witness In The Warsaw Ghetto

Decent Essays

“It is necessary to resist the tendency of recent Holocaust scholarships to universalize or collectivize Holocaust testimony, and instead revive the particular by uncovering the multiple layers within testimony.” (1) Zoe Waxman’s 2006 monograph Writing the Holocaust: Identity, Testimony, Representation sets out to prove that while the Holocaust has been universalized as one event, historians must explore the social and historical context of the many individual narratives of Holocaust witnesses in order to understand the diversity of experiences. Waxman states “three theses emerge during the course of the present study” (1) and sets out to demonstrate that Holocaust testimonies are historical, to prove that the testimony is mediated by its own history, and that testimonies confirm to the heterogeneity of Holocaust experiences. Beginning in the introduction, Waxman argues that the Holocaust was not just one event, but various events that were witnessed by many different people over an expansive time frame and a large geographical area. Therefore, there cannot be one universal testament to the events and it is imperative that all testimonies are examined excluding all biases. In the five chapters of the book, Waxman looks at the testament of “first chronicler, …show more content…

The documents have various motivations for their writings including personal confession, historical testimony, to resist, to assert individual agency, to continue the Jewish tradition of witnessing, and to provide a memorial to those that did not survive the harsh conditions. However, the Warsaw Ghetto was only part of the Holocaust experience as many other ghettos existed. In regards to her argument, it would have been beneficial for Waxman to examine the testimony from other ghettos in addition to the testaments by those from the Warsaw

Get Access