Photography is a powerful tool that can change the way someone feels about an event by being able to see how the event looks. Pictures during WW2 showed civilians what the war was like without having them be in the war. It gives people an impression how something is and is more descriptive than writing because you are able to actually see what the war is about instead of just reading an article about war. Unlike writing, it is hard for someone to fake how the war looks with a photograph because you aren't able to lie in a photograph. Some of the most popular photographs from WW2 are pictures of soldiers and civilians that are struggling. People feel sympathy for those civilians which attract more people to look at the photographs because they …show more content…
If a soldier was trying to harm another soldier or civilian but the picture was taken at a point where it looks like they are helping each other, then people might think that a certain group was helping another group instead of being enemies with each other. If there were no pictures, then the only thing to document history is a pen and pencil which doesn't give people the same perspective as a photograph would. People also believe a photograph much more than they would if someone had said that an event had happened. An example could be the Holocaust, there are countless pictures of the Holocaust and many different diaries yet some people don't believe that it happened. If there were no photographs of it, there would be more people that didn't believe in it because the proof wouldn't be in a photograph, it would be what someone had said. Time Magazine said “there are about 100,000 Jews who were in camps, ghettos, and in hiding under Nazi occupation who are still alive today”, with the amount of disbelief in the Holocaust now, in 100 years the amount of people that don't believe in Holocaust will go up since there would be any more survivors to tell the story. The only thing to do to try and stop the disbelief is publicize more photos of the Holocaust and hope that it limits the amount of people that don't believe in it. Photographs helped to prove that certain events happened and changed the way that some people look at the
These include the images that are released to the news, newspapers, and even textbooks. There is a certain photographer, Christoph Bangert, mentioned in Source D who takes photos of war scenes, calling these pictures “war porn”. He uses that term not because he believes it is war porn, but to undermine the argument. “You can always say that this… is dehumanizing, but I think it’s too easy to call these pictures pornographic or voyeuristic. If you say it is morally wrong to look at them, you avoid being confronted with these events.” He says that we must be confronted with the events that occur in wars, so that we may be able to accurately remember history. Bangert offers us a scenario when saying, “Just imagine if nobody had published pictures of the Holocaust or of the liberation of the Nazi camps. That would mean that it would be very difficult for us to remember these events.” This is true, and very significant to our society and history. These images show us knowledge, and allow us to prevent future cruelties, all following Sontag’s
War has always been an unfortunate part of our society and civilization. War will sadly and undoubtedly be with us as long as we exist. However, the portrayal of war for many centuries gave a sense of patriotism and romanticism. Then the invention of the camera changed how humanity perceived war in the late to mid 19th century. And all of a sudden, images of war became of shear violence and destruction. The violence in these images would play a significant part in the social and political standpoints of war in our nation.
War Photographer by Carol Ann Duffy War Photographer by Carol Ann Duffy is based on a war photographer who has experienced and witnessed the reality of war. The war photographer has returned to his quite home in England from his latest job. He develops the spools of film, he took in the frontline. As he organizes the pictures, he remembers the terrifying situation he is in, "A stranger's features faintly start to twist before his eyes a half-formed ghost." Then, he sends those pictures to the Sunday newspaper, where his editor will choose the ones to be printed.
While emotions were extremely high in the sense of angst for a better life, photography provided a new sense of reality to Americans and for others around the World. Photography all around the World is unlike anything else of its kind. People are able to tell stories and elicit emotions that bring the audience to that desired response. Throughout the 1930’s, photography from governmental institutions or advancements alone brought a new beginning to the end of a terrible time that Americans all around the nation
World War II World War II was a pivotal event of the 20th century and a defining
In the story “The War Photo No One Would Publish” by Torie Rose DeGhett the photographer (Kenneth Jarecke) takes gruesome photographs of deceased war victims. In 1991, the photo was taken of an Iraqi soldier struggling to pull himself out of a burning vehicle. The fire “incarcerated him to ash and blackened bone” (The War Photo No One Would Publish 1). After taking the photo, Jarecke wanted the image to be published but, due to its unsightly nature no one would publish it. DeGhett believed that this photo should be published he is trying to convince you as to why. The reason this shall not be posted is this soldier is somebody's family member; they do not want to see that image disseminated to the public.
While I agree that, war images do have a negative impact on the public having them become filled with ultimate horror and confusion, I continue to hold that war images are indeed necessary, and should without a doubt be revealed to the public, in helping them except war and violence, better
Like Sontag, I believe that taking pictures is a form of liberation that enables people to release anxiety and increase their power by constructing a better society.
My goal for this photographic essay is to capture the emotion and historical significance surrounding Remembrance Day. I intend on attending a number of events this week, including the Ghost Soliders Platoon, Sappers and Shrapnel Art Exhibition, Field of Remembrance and the main ceremony featuring the last post. At these events I will take a large amount of photos from different angles, in an effort to capture the grave feeling of this event in a single picture. I will use a close up shot to reveal the details in the face of a soldier, a low-angle shot to uncover the shape of a well-known statue and a combination of wide and high angle shots overlooking the poppies at both the field out the front of Pulteney and North Terrace. Through a
Sontag claims that “photography is, a social rite, but it can also be a defense against anxiety and a tool of power (page 130).” She backs her claim by stating “photographs give people an imaginary possession of a past that is unreal, they also help people to take possessions of space in which they are insecure.” (Sontag page 131). In other words, having pictures allows people to tell stories that may not be exactly true. I agree with Sontag because I have witnessed and experienced how pictures can hurt someone emotionally while empowering others.
Robert Capa’s approach to photography was one of the simpler methods, that being straight photography. Capa’s images of war are often praised as some of the best, as he was right there with the soldiers capturing the cycle of life and death. He is quoted as fittingly saying “If your pictures aren’t good enough, then you aren’t close enough.” One of his most famous images was taken on D-day, where after coming in with the second wave, he captures the image of a soldier. Though the image is very shaky and blurred, it’s a perfect example of Robert’s approach, taking a photo there in the moment, capturing the emotions of the moment and the chaos of war.
The first fascinating difference between this work and the majority of other war photography presents itself in a fairly obvious manner. The soldiers’ faces in “Into the Jaws of Death” are turned away from the photo so as to make them invisible to the audience. Instead, we see only the supplies on their backs and the camouflage on their uniforms. The effect of this lack of eye contact is that the audience cannot connect with the people in the photograph. The majority of other wartime photographs used iconic images of courageous and vibrant soldiers rushing fearlessly into the glory of battle or contained motivational quotes requesting support for the troops. “Into the Jaws Of Death” does neither of these, entirely on purpose. Because we as the audience do not have eye contact
In the second stanza , the writer is said to quote: "He has a job to
In war, photography and art again serve the purpose of acknowledging and sometimes protesting suffering. In the First World War cameras were used for military intelligence, to capture an event. "The caption of a photograph is traditionally neutral informative: a date, a place, names." A photograph is supposed to just record what happened and not takes sides. However, "it is always the image that someone chose; to photograph is to frame, and to frame is to exclude." So the photograph is supposed to be neutral, but the photographer is still deciding what details to focus on. The caption has just facts on it, because supposedly that is what the photograph is recording. While it is true that photographs cannot explain everything themselves, they do serve as visual aids to, what otherwise be, a pallid world.
Photographers were expected to be able to take these mind blowing pictures of the war in rapid action, but the truth is there technology back then wasn’t advanced enough to be able to produce these sort of images. The images took only minutes to develop but a huge