Ww2 Weapons Essay

Within World War I began a new age of warfare. As compared to previous engagements, the adoption of new weapons changed the way in World War I was fought. Not only did the concept of war change in terms of where battles were fought, how much revenue must be spent on the war and how much time a war could span; weapons changed. During the Indian Wars and War for independence, basic weapons were used. World War I began to become mobile. Use of planes, tanks and other technological advances had been implemented. The technological advances brought about were implemented within this war in an attempt to make the war last a shorter and to show prestige. Not only were mobile aerial and ground assets involved in war now, but other technology

During the height of World War II in Europe, Germany began to find itself on the decline with the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. To regain its momentum, newer war machines were introduced. A case in point is the unveiling of the Panzerkampfwagen V, dubbed the Panther. This vehicle was a German medium tank produce during the war from 1943 to the end of the war in 1945. Design first as a counter to the Soviet T-34s first witness in battles during 1941, and secondly as a replacement for the Panzer III and Panzer

     In the first phase of World War II in Europe, Germany sought to avoid a long war. Germany's strategy was to defeat its opponents in a series of short campaigns. Germany quickly overran much of Europe and was victorious for more than two years by relying on a new military tactic called the "Blitzkrieg" (lightning war). Blitzkrieg tactics required the concentration of offensive weapons (such as tanks, planes, and artillery) along a narrow front. These forces would drive a breach in enemy defenses, permitting armored tank divisions to penetrate rapidly and roam freely behind enemy lines, causing shock and

Tanks are strong combat vehicles that are used worldwide in the front line. These vehicles are very strong and durable to withstand gunfire from enemy personnel. The armour is very thick but not thick enough to withstand a large shot from another tank.

It was also the only tank that stayed in production throughout the entire duration of the war. The tank was mass-produced by The Krupp Family, which they were responsible for the production steel, artillery, ammunition, and other armaments. They produced the tank at in 1941, an average of 39 tanks per month; this rose to 83 in 1942, 252 in 1943, and 300 in 1944. This was all to fuel Hitler’s need for power and development. However, factories and plants began to work on other tanks such as the Jagdpanzer IV, it left only the Nibelungenwerke as the only plant still assembling the Panzer IV. However in 1944 after increased pressure applied to the German industry and constant raids by air and foot, the Nibelungenwerke plant was damaged and thus was only able to produce a small amount of tanks per

The one and only heavy tank that the United States used was the M.26 “Pershing”, it was the only heavy tank that made or used in World War II for the U.S because it was hard to make and the U.S didn’t think that it was necessary to use a heavy tank when they have the M4, but the M.26 “Pershing” packed a huge punch was a 90mm main gun and 2 .50 cal Browning machine guns,this tank only held 5 crewmates inside, the armour was a thickness of a 102mm, the speed of the heavy tank was 20mph at max, and the weight of the tank was 41.7 tons. Even with all this fighting power the war couldn’t ended without the

These two monstrous tanks would have been more tantamount to war vessels with treads, outfitted with maritime weapons and manned by many men. Neither one of the designs was even a tiny bit reasonable, and the tanks never moved beyond the mockup organize. In any case, if constructed, they would have been practically indestructible by any methods other than overwhelming bombarding.

As a combined unit, the tactics that the German armor divisions used shocked and incited fear within the Allies. This is evident in the examination of the advanced strategies used by the German crews to overcome the Allied forces. Although the Allied forces designed and produced new tanks to specifically counter these tanks, these new tanks were still not enough to counter the efficiency of the German crews and their Panzers. Many of these new World War II designs were based off of the German Panzers as well as many as other tanks even after the war. The construction of these new tanks only proved the desperation of the Allied powers to topple the German control of the battlefield as well as highlight the quality of engineering that the Germans used to design their tanks. The comparison of the effectiveness of these German tanks and the Allied tanks is significant in revealing the reason why Nazi Germany was able to take over much of Europe and withstand the attacks of the other world powers for such a long period of time. The analysis and evaluations given will support that Nazi Germany’s tank designs and implementation of their Panzer IV, Tiger I, and Tiger II tanks was superior to that

The Sturmpanzerwagen was used in action from March to October 1918, and was the only tank produced by Germany in World War I to be used in combat. This tank was designed by Joseph Vollmer in 1916 to be used by the German Empire. In service, it required no fewer than eighteen men to operate, these proved hard to maneuver and unreliable and was therefore not deemed a success. The A7V-U was presented as its improved model and attempted to correct the mistakes made in the making of the original A7V. It was used in battles such as St. Quentin Canal, Villers-Brettoneux, and the third battle of Aisne. The Sturmpanzerwagen was the first tank used in combat, and tanks have since evolved greatly.

“T-34’s Role in the Eastern Front: How the most versatile tank in WWII defeated the Nazis in Operation Barbarossa”

The first six tanks sent into combat all got stuck, and five were recovered and returned to service. Once the tanks began to work, they proved to be very effective. Germany was finally able to overcome the Russian armor, and defeated many Russian tanks. The Tiger served in the Battle of Kursk, which was the largest tank battle in history. The tank did quite well, but in the end the Germans lost the battle and were pushed back (Lentz 99). The Russians soon realized that the new heavy tank was a force to be reckoned with, and ran when a Tiger was seen. The Russians began working on their own heavy tank, capable of dealing with the Tiger at ranges the tiger would normally attack at. The Soviets had used T-34s armed with 85mm guns, but these had to be close up to be effective against the German Tiger. The end result was the IS-2. This was a new heavy tank armed with a 122mm cannon. This new tank was capable of dealing with the tiger at ranges of 1500 to 2000 meters. The new Russian Tank can deal with the Tiger at ranges of up to 1500 meters, the same distance that the Tiger would engage

The second element of blitzkrieg is about rapidly advancing tanks and motorized infantry. The German tanks and motorized infantry were called the panzer division, which panzer in Germany it means “Armored”. It was easily raced across the flat

They made them bigger, heavier, have more armor, and they added bigger guns. The main tanks that they upgraded were the Pz. IV and the Tiger Tank. They also introduced the Panther medium tank around this time. The Panther medium

Prior to May 1940, the combined French and British forces had almost one thousand more tanks than the Germans. There were several leaders within the French government, like Charles de Gaulle, who desperately desired to invest more of the French defense budget on increased tank manufacturing. The two most favored French battle tanks produced at the start of the war were the Char B and the Somua S35. Both of these tanks were relatively expensive to produce, with the Char B costing 1.5 million francs and the Somua S35 costing 982,000 francs each to produce. Both tanks were superior to the German Panzer, with the Char B being a heavily armored battle tank designed for an offensive role of advancing against prepared defenses and breaking through enemy lines. The Char B was favored by some of the leadership, but it was extremely expensive to produce and was considered an offensive tank, which was not considered well-suited to integrate into the France’s defensive based military strategy. The Somua S35 was also favored by some of the French leadership due its increased armor and powerful main gun and because it was nearly as fast as the Panzer on the battlefield. Deciding the best overall tank that would support France’s military strategy was major concern, with some preferring strong heavy battle tanks and

This was mainly the reason why Germany poured massive funding and manpower into the further development of this technology and was able to harness the success earlier. Germany’s jet fighters and jet bombers were the most feared air craft on the battlefield as the fighter jet was able to gun down on average five Allied fighter planes before being shot down. Rapid increases in the technologies of war and destructiveness like these are what made war so violent and bloodshed during the turn of the century. The scale that World War Two was fought on was much larger than that of the wars before the dawn of civilization. During this time, war was considered small scale as it was often between two small groups and was not recognized by any government or authority as there was none at the time. It wasn’t until the rise of state five thousand years ago that military activity started to happen all over the globe. The very first wars were fought with hand to hand combat often with improvised melee peripherals designed to injure the victim severely such as a spear. This was known as ancient warfare. Medieval warfare lasted from the beginning of the 5th century until the 15th century. The middle ages saw large cultural, social, and technological developments which changed the way war was fought into a more strategic and thought out procedure versus ancient warfare where there was rarely any strategy involved and armies