Yasser Arafat Research Paper

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the one of the world’s oldest conflicts, and it is still an ongoing problem in the world. Zionists and Arabs: two groups with conflicting beliefs who both claim Israel as their own. In wake of the Holocaust the U.N decided to gift the Jews a homeland for the lives lost in the genocide. In 1947, the U.N Partition divided the land of Israel (Historic Palestine) into two separate states: Arab and Jewish. Since then, the state of Israel has been the center of conflict between the Arabs and the Zionists. As time passed the Zionists gained more land from winning the Six-Day War, and consequently the Palestinians had to live as refugees in other Arab countries. Additionally, more than 75% of the land belonged to

The Arab- Israeli Conflict was and still is a big issue. Many people have been involved in this conflict in the past. When BIll Clinton was president he had a semi big role in the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

Israel’s dominance of Palestine affected the country itself and its inhabitants. Through the entire process of Israel seizing Palestine, millions of lives have been changed forever, for reasons that will never be

Throughout the Arab-Israeli conflict, a multitude of people were extremely influential, either for good or for bad. Among the growing list is the 39th President of the United States, James Earl Carter Jr., although people know him better as Jimmy Carter. He is known for publishing multiple books on this controversial affair, receiving the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts toward trying to resolving the issue, and overseeing and participating in the Camp David Peace Accords. Although he was originally not on a particular side in this conflict, in the more recent years he has strongly favored the Arabic side, also known as the Palestinians, who want a state of their own.

This essay will focus on how theorists of peace and conflict have analysed the conflict in recent history. Especially, the peace process after the first Palestinian intifada and the 1993 Oslo-agreements will be analysed. In addition, this essay will shed light on the involvement of the United States in the

Anwar Sadat has impacted the peace process in the Arab-Israeli conflict through the role he played in the Camp David Accords. He is liked by the Israelis for the peace he brought between Egypt and Israel, but is disliked by the Arabs for the same reason.

His demise came when he was killed in an Israeli airstrike in 2004 as he was leaving a Gaza City mosque.

When Israel launched a major raid against the Jordanians, Jordanian security forces were destroyed and Arafat came in. Arafat and Fatah could claim a victory, but they realized that their was important and hard to achieve. Almost a week later, Arafat went across the Jordan river in disguise to Palestine and in multiple places, set up recruitment areas for people willing to fight against Israel. Then,

Is peace possible in the Middle East? This question weighs heavy on the minds of many individuals and international players. Turmoil and conflict in the Middle East not only affects the people inhabiting this region, but also has global consequences. To answer this question, one must analyze the sources of conflict in the Middle East, historically, currently, and in the future. The limited amount of natural resources in this region has arguably served as the most major source of conflict in the Middle East. Other contributing factors to conflict are the leadership styles of the key players in positions of power, and religious strife. History is often the best indicator for the future. Unfortunately, the Middle East has had a history of

The First Intifada changed the direction of the peace process and affected every Palestinians’ life. The Intifada was a mass movement against the Israeli authority through boycotts, civil disobedience and general strikes. Israel reacted to the Intifada by deploying 80,000 troops to stop the uprising by “breaking Palestinians’ bones”[Footnote]. The Oslo Accords were signed by both Israel and Palestine to end the Intifada and create a stable peace which gave Palestinians freedom and Israelis security. The Palestinian Liberation Organisation was recognised by Israel and to represent the Palestinian people in future summits. The accords failed to give either country what they desired and were never a final solution to the Middle East Crisis. Due to the failure of the Oslo accords and subsequent agreements the Palestinian people marched in protest of worsening conditions. The Second Intifada came soon after the failure of the Camp David Summit suggesting the “lack of a political solution results in increased tension and outbursts of violence”.

The First Intifada took place on the 8th of December 1987. This protest was against Israeli’s occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. At the crowded checkpoint Israeli truck swerved and killed four The Palestinians. Palestinians in revenge swept across the Gaza Strip, spread to the World Bank and set into motion a blaze of nationalist resistance to occupation. Intifada began unpredictably spontaneous actions such as stone-throwing were happening, but later on Intifada became more organized. Students, women, workers, agriculture started to grow food in gardens and at home to replace Israeli goods. Clinics were providing emergency help to people who were in need. Palestinians always have seen themselves as occupied, that what made them economically depend on Israel. Palestinian’s work, wages were half of what Israeli workers would get paid, their taxes were high and another thing was that they didn’t have any kind of job security, because Israeli security denied them any rights within Israel. In this case, position of Palestine is understandable, they are like any other people wanted to be free from being heavily dependent on the Israeli’s rules and resist the force that has been used against them.

In 1979 the Arab Israeli conflict took a turn for the good when Israel and Egypt Signed a peace treaty at Camp David. The treaty was a trade that Israel would Give Egypt The Sinai Peninsula and Egypt would have peace with Israel. In 1994 Yitzhak Rabin Prime Minister of Israel and Yasser Arifat head Of the Palestine Liberation Organization signed a peace treaty that Israel gave the Palistine Liberation Organization the Gaza Strip and the West Bank and Israel got peace, but after the treaty was signed there were still many terrorist attacks on Israel and November 4th 1995 Prime Minister Rabin was assassinated by a Israel man who saw that the peace treaty wasn't working and didn't believe in trading land that Israel fought for in many wars for peace that wasn't working.

For many centuries, Judaic and Arabian societies have engaged in one of the most complicated and lengthy conflicts known to mankind, the makings of a highly difficult peace process. Unfortunately for all the world’s peacemakers the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly the war between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, is rooted in far more then ethnic tensions. Instead of drawing attention towards high-ranking officials of the Israeli government and Hamas, focus needs to be diverted towards the more suspect and subtle international relations theory of realism which, has imposed more problems than solutions.

Keeping these thoughts in mind I will investigate some key issues that affect the progress towards peace in the region including the relationship that exists between the United States and Israel; the 2002 Road Map to Peace and why it failed; and finally the effect of Arafat?s death and the implications for the future.

After more than 50 years of war, terrorism, peace negotiation and human suffering, Israel and Palestine remain as far from a peaceful settlement as ever. The entire Middle Eastern region remains a cauldron waiting to reach the boiling point, a potent mixture of religious extremism, (Jewish, Christian and Islamic), mixed with oil and munitions.