preview

Yatim's Case Summary

Decent Essays

On the evening of July 26th, 2013, 18-year old Sammy Yatim boarded a street car threatening passengers on board with a 4-inch knife. Constable James Forcillo and his partner first arrived at the scene trying to detain the suspect. The stand-off between Yatim and the officers did not last long. Within several minutes of trying to detain Yatim, Constable Forcillo shot three initial shot at Yatim fatally wounding him and another six shots. Eight of the nine bullets discharged at Yatim fatally wounded the teenager, however the three initial shots were enough to immobilize Yatim. Autopsy reports stated that Yatim had “‘moderate to moderately high’ levels of ecstasy in his system at the time” (Hasham, 2015). The fatal shooting was captured by onlookers …show more content…

Yatim refused and provoked the officer, in a non-violent act, to shoot him (Rogan, 2014). In a threatening manner, Forcillo warned Yatim that if he proceeded to move towards the exit of the street car he will regret the decision (Rogan, 2014). Yatim contemplated and took another step towards the exit; that is when Forcillo shot Yatim, fatally wounding the teenage boy. According to Police management of mental health crisis situations in the community: Status quo, current gaps and future directions, the use of police violence, whether it is lethal or fatal, “is only permitted in order to preserve life, or if extreme danger is anticipated” (Tribolet-Hardy, 2014; 295). The actions that Forcillo took to prevent Yatim from exiting the street car was in an extreme case of police force. There was no signs were indicated that Yatim a threat to the public as he was seen behaving in an erratic and somewhat violent manner; Yatim displayed no intensions of harming the passengers. Crown prosecutor Milan Rupic represented The Crown in the trial against Forcillo (charged with second-degree murder) stated that witnesses in the case will testify that although being vulnerable to being harmed while fleeing the street car occupied by Yatim, he did not attack a single passenger while they fled (Hasham, 2015). The preservation of life criticized was not held …show more content…

However, upon analyzing the incident involving the force of police and mentally ill, have flaws in which is why the altercation resulted in the victim’s death. In the case of Forcillo discharging the nine shots at Yatim fatally killing him, it projected his thoughts a misjudgement. In belief and through misjudgement it may be Forcillo was unaware that Yatim was under the influence of drugs, therefore his belief was that Yatim was mentally insane. By training the police force to detect the usage of drugs within the person by body language instead of finding or smelling the evidence, it will eliminate the assumption that the suspect has the intentions of their actions. Policies issuing on the topic of mental health during criminal acts are not an unlikely occurrence. Nevertheless, careful considerations should be made towards cases involving intoxication or high levels of drugs. In cases that the individual is aggressive or unresponsive to demands of the correcting officers, violent actions to detain the individual must be limited to not harm or have the individual harm themselves at any cost. The self-preservation of life mentioned in Police management of mental health crisis situations in the community: Status quo, current gaps and future directions should be the main priority

Get Access