Yosemite National Park Research Paper

Yosemite National Park, is a beautiful piece of nature it is a 195 mile nature getaway from the urban life that is lived San Francisco, CA and 315 miles away from the fast pace and overwhelming life that is lived in Los Angeles CA. This place is like no other in the beauty of its nature. The park is “747,956 acres, and is the home to hundreds of wildlife species and thousands of Yosemite plants” (U.S. Nat. Park Service). Yosemite is known for so many beautiful features, from its granite cliffs, waterfalls, clear streams, giant sequoia groves and biological diversity. And also for its two rivers which are the Tuolumne and Merced rivers. These rivers begin in the park and flow as far as west to the

Wilderness in its true state is lush, sleek, and channels water. It is because of its true natural state that is has the ability to generate billions of dollars into America’s recreational economy. One provident example, is the San Gabriel Wilderness in California. Now of course protecting this land has natural benefits,

National parks are places that are considered historically significant, or unique enough to be protected by the federal government. These parks are designated as a protected area for animals, and people are able to visit and enjoy these serene places. National parks include places like: Yellowstone, Yosemite, the Everglades, the Grand Canyon, and the Sequoia’s. These places are contain very diverse and unique ecosystems that are thriving due to their protection. People are able to see what the untouched wilderness is like in an age of expanding urbanization. These places could be decimated and built upon if were not for the government's protection and funding. The National Park Service

England and Wales possess some of the finest national parks in Europe. In terms of percentage of overall area protected, of natural beauty, and as models of organisation, they have a great deal to offer the visitor. However, controversy over the distribution of these parks has recently grown. Some in Britain have commented that, though numerous, the parks are not well-distributed (see, for example, Fisher [1999] and Smith [2000]). Marcus and Nabulsi (1999) have singled out the complete absence of any national park in lowland areas for specific criticism. This essay will examine the environmental/economic effects that have resulted from this. It will then evaluate some of the responses that have been put forward, and suggest that the argument in favour of lowland parks is a persuasive one.

In the Yale Environment 360 it is mentioned what overcrowding does. In the article it states, “Hundreds of people crowd wildlife along the roads, and some animals lose their fear of humans and need to be moved. Wildlife is also displaced by the numbers of people on the trails.” (Robbins). This creates a problem for animals to move away from their known habitat. Also, if there are limitations on specific areas, people wouldn’t step on the vegetation or aquatic animals on the floor. Other national parks such as Yellowstone, have the same problem. I know of a recreational park close to my home that provides signs saying that some pathways are restricted to pedestrians. The NPS can find a similar idea where they can limit specific areas for people not to

Imagine you were by a lake that the water was ice blue shimmering under the sun , you're surrounded by pine trees, looking at mountains with snow covered peaks that meets with the sky. Well that place does exist, that place is the Rocky Mountains national park in Colorado. The Rocky Mountains ranges from the United States and Canada. People from around the world visit these mountains to explore these enormous mountains. Most of the area in these mountains hit 14,000 above sea level. The Rocky Mountains became the 10th national park to be established. The national park was established in 1915. President Wilson signed the act into law because the U.S. wanted to conserve that wildlife. Some factors are problems to this land could be climate

These sites are conserved to protect nature’s beauty and places of value to the people who are natives of the land. Today’s problem comes from the federal government proposing significant budget cuts to the NPS. If the government continues with this plan, Americans will lose the chance to experience untouched nature. Even though conserving these parks, monuments, and historical sites are not a priority in the government’s eyes, investing in the NPS should be a priority because the national monuments protect the meaning and value of the land and people are paying lots of money to keep the parks protected.

home to some of the worlds most unique creatures and significant artifacts. When you think about a national park you don’t think about the advantages that come from our backyard. Our nation doesn’t understand touching our national parks can damage the future of our country. If the leading generation doesn’t preserve the prinicable values and places of America then why should the next leading generation? Because of the Historical significance and the need for understanding in our next generations, our country needs to understand the importance of the investment in our nation's national parks.

For 145 years, the national parks and monuments have been valued and shared by millions of Americans. Whether it’s the average person looking out over the Grand Canyon and saying “wow, that’s beautiful,” or President Teddy Roosevelt, the father of the National Parks himself, saying, “There can be nothing in the world more beautiful than the Yosemite…” the joy from nature is still present. So no matter what, the choice that will be made about these parks is crucial, and affects everyone. This issue has two sides, but one is clearly. Despite the potentially better uses for the land, we need to keep the parks and monuments devoted to

Each year wildlife all throughout the world are put at risk through deforestation, littering and malnourishment. America is no different, especially with the new budget for the Trump administration. Ever since Donald Trump has been elected President of The United States of America, everything has changed. The safety from threats outside of America are greater than the threats in everyone’s backyard. Animals are becoming endangered or worse, becoming extinct. Plant life is finding it harder to cope with new environmental threats as well as climate change. There are places that have been a final safe haven for wildlife to flourish as a whole. state parks. Theodore Roosevelt, who made the first national and

There are many good reason to have national parks. First, National parks provide variety living things. All the different plants and animals on Earth make up the variety of living things, or 'biodiversity'. We share this planet with all these creatures and we must do our best to protect them. Many plants and animals can only live in certain areas. Second, National parks have a lot of plants so they play a big part in keeping our environment healthy. They protect some of these areas. We all need fresh air, clean water and food. Without them we would die. The leaves of plants make fresh air. Their roots hold the soil together, which stops erosion and helps keep our waterways clean. Also, National parks are places of natural beauty. They are places for people to relax in and enjoy. Many people have fun bushwalking, camping or having a picnic. There are lots of things to do in a national park such as swimming, skiing, painting, taking photographs, enjoying the view and taking in fresh air. In addition, National parks are places for everybody to learn about native plants and animals and the way they rely on each other. Historic sites and Aboriginal sites also help us to learn about how people lived in the past.

Our nations incredible 401 National Parks are some of the most iconic places on the face of the earth. From the Grand Canyon to the Great Smoky Mountains our nation's national parks are something we should be proud to have. Lately our National Parks have been under threat from both Environmental and Political issues both putting our National Parks at risk. We need preserve the National Parks for generations to come. The National Parks show the most amazing parts of this great nation, they are the source of billions of dollars in revenue, and they are the home to countless forms of wildlife.

Wilderness areas are a very important to future generations. WThe wilderness is designed to protect and preserve scenic lands. Without protected wilderness areas, animals that are native to the area will not have a habitat; future generations won’t have clean air to breathe, fresh water to drink, or natural areas to enjoy or escape to. Therefore, it is important that citizens today work to protect and preserve the wilderness areas that do exist.

Protected public lands, including national parks, cover a growing 12% of the world’s land and a gradually rising amount of marine areas (Dudley, et al. 87). Today, in the United States (U.S.) alone, 59 national parks compromise the country’s National Parks System, which was sanctioned by Congress and is managed by National Parks Service (NPS), an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. The parks have become a controversial topic in recent legislation because some representatives are lobbying for change in ownership and management of the parks to create more economic return. Although the parks confer multiple benefits and costs on the U.S, perhaps the most contentious area of debate concerns the cost-benefit dichotomy of the parks’ collective economic value.

Protected natural areas–state and federal parks, private nature preserves, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, and other conserved