You Aren T The Real Buzz Lightyear Analysis

The choices we decide to make build our path in life. If we make the right choices, then your life will be the life you want to live. I believe that we were all destined with some kind of purpose. However, the choices we make will determine whether we fulfill that purpose or not. Thus, our choices will ultimately decide our fate. Through the years, we have been taught about choices and their impact on our actions. We have free will in the sense that we can either go on one road or the other. We decide what we do on a daily basis, moment by moment, and we decide what path we want to go on. In the novel, Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag was a fireman who had his life entirely changed when he met a 17 year old girl named Clarisse, and an old woman who

"Everything can be taken from man but ?the last of the human freedoms - to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way." In this, Frankl discusses how different men chose different attitudes. Some remained descent, while others chose to become sadistic. He explains that it is the condition or the atmosphere that forces man to make this decision but that the condition or atmosphere does not make the decision. Each person has to decide what attitude to adopt. As Frankl further explains "there is also purpose in life which is almost barren of both creation and enjoyment and which admits of but one possibility of high moral behavior: namely, in man's attitude to his existence restricted by external forces."

There are those who think that our behavior is a result of free choice, but there are also others who believe we are servants of cosmic destiny, and that behavior is nothing but a reflex of heredity and environment. The position of determinism is that every event is the necessary outcome of a cause or set of causes, and everything is a consequence of external forces, and such forces produce all that happens. Therefore, according to this statement, man is not free.

Since the beginning of time, the environment in which one is accustomed to provides them with the choices that lead down paths that make their legacy. This environment can be negative or positive, structured or chaotic, rich or poor, all which give a variety of choices. Regardless of the different trials and tribulations we face ultimately, it is the choices we make in response that make us the person we become.

When looking for things to do in our lifetimes, we tend to look at what other people do in order to take inspiration and do whatever they did for ourselves. However, there is a point where instead of naturally discovering what life has to offer for ourselves, we instead rely on how others experienced it and use that as a guide to shape our expectations for something. In Walker Percy’s writing “The Loss of the Creature”, he explores a concept he calls, “loss of sovereignty”. What he means by this term is that people will surrender free thoughts of their own and rely instead on what other people's brains think, then live off others thoughts instead of their own. To add explanation, people surrender their own thoughts and expectations, Percy says, “The consumer is content to receive an experience just as it has been presented to him by theorists and planners. The reader may also be content to judge life by whether it has or has not been formulated by those who know and write about life” (3). This shows that if the person experiencing something new in this world for the first time, they will fear that they would not know what to look out for. So they rely on others, especially the so-called “experts” to guide the road for them instead. The overall message Percy argues when it comes to Part I of “The Loss of the Creature” is that people will not let their own natural thoughts dictate what they personally think about experiencing something and instead, use others experiences to

As the author said, sometimes the fate can be changed by choice you make. It encourages the reader that it is always possible to change and fix destinies before it is too late. One important quote that the author wrote is, “This book is meant to show us how... our destinies can be determined by a single stumble down the wrong path , or a tentative step down the right one." (Moore xiv).

The Paradox of Life A story of two beings with destinies determined by simple choices, those that seemed insignificant at the time, The Other Wes Moore has been written to portray how foolish ideals can be evermore changing, enough for one to have a life-sentence. The author Wes Moore establishes a distinct contradiction, one in which the Other Wes Moore’s willingness to bring about a change is conceded by his family’s simple inclination to thrive in a world like his own. Using displays of particularly pathos and semantics, Wes communicates this paradox to the reader with an ease that forms binding connections rippling in the wake of this realization. Throughout the book, the Other Wes Moore constantly struggles to make decisions that, in the end, will leave him and his counterparts satisfied with the outcomes.

Humans are blessed and cursed with the highest mental consciousness in the animal kingdom. Our intellectuality places us above living by instinct, yet isn’t high enough to exempt us from the laws of nature; though our intellectual state allows us to easily forget the natural laws we, along with all living creatures, are governed by. Our mental consciousness is also the determining factor that allows humans to survive under the worst conditions. When we give up our will to survive we will almost surely die, perhaps simply because we no longer care enough about life try to live. “Every time people come at us with

There is no pre-programmed destiny, no inherent meaning in our lives. Instead, meaning arises from the individual's impetus to will freely, to do what we choose in any given moment, and to then reflect upon those choices and the ways in which they alter reality and the lives of others. Being and Nothingness defines every individual as just that: a lone individual. The nature of our being is truly isolated from the nature of other beings and the world around us – while our actions and essence contain an implicit interconnectedness with the world, while meaning can only come from the existence of external phenomena, our true self is like an island surrounded by impenetrable nothingness – pregnant with the potential for possibility, but always empty in-itself.

(Existentialism: We as humans have some control over our own destinies. We may not be able to choose our situations (like where and when and what colour we are born) but we can choose how we live our lives and what we do with them. For instance, when Winston has to face the fact that John is leaving in 3 months and he is only leaving in 10 years,

However, instead of accepting this as the unchangeable way of life, he chooses to live it in a

Our existence can be illustrated by envisioning a painter who is fabricating a painting. As the painter begins to use the soft brush, its thistles with each movement construct systems and subsystems that are elaborately woven together to display biased perception of ourselves. Consequently, a misguided stroke may alter an exceptional piece of art turning it into a catastrophe. Regrettably, this metaphor unveils the misfortune that can occur in the lives of numerous individuals. Comparatively, like the painter who can be consumed by adversity, a victim of domestic violence with one misstep can eradicate his/her own life.

Our lifestyle choices limits us because of how much free will we are given. In giving us that free will we see how we as human create our own limits as well as our own mental blocks to keep us

In Into the Wild, Christopher McCandless chooses what he wants to believe in life and how important that might be to him. As Sartre points out: “Man chooses his own

To me, life is not consciously created. No one has a life goal, one that starts the moment they are born and continues to the moment they die. Some people are very goal oriented, but even if they have persistent goals, they do not persist for life. Every day, they engage in all sorts of toll-free behavior that does not work towards the goal at all. This is markedly different from what players do in games. When playing chess, every move one makes is an attempt to win that game. There are no "side-track" moves, meaning, one that idly slides a pawn around the board just to explore. Rooks never have to take bathroom break. Queens do not get sick. Bishops do not get distracted by fantasies. Game-players are not precision machines. They are people, so they do get sidetracked at times, but games are designed to minimize sidetracks, whereas life is not. It is not designed at