Your Body Language Shapes Who You Are Analysis

A person’s pose can simply reflect their individuality, where actions are more powerful than words. Professor, and researcher at Harvard, Amy Cuddy, in her TED talk, “Your Body Languages Shapes Who You Are” focuses on how nonverbal communication affects judgements in the classroom and the boardroom. She connects with the audience by expressing how challenging “power” is an intimidating status to uphold, while at the same time trying to communicate warmth as well. However, with the drawbacks of one’s self-consciousness, many fail to find that balance. Through her use of ethos, purpose of logos, and appeal to pathos, Amy Cuddy adopts an authoritative tone to in order to convey the audience that an individual's body language shapes who they are.

A walk to convey power. A greeting that gets the upper hand. A gesture that can hide a lie. Body language can betray us. When a president 's under pressure. Or celebrities in the media glare. Look beyond the words. Their body language says it all. It 's a sudden poise. Self-touch gesture. Hot spots. Microexpressions. In this special, experts will dissect the body, the face, and the voice to reveal its hidden meanings, its secrets. This is a world where what we say is all important. They said this day would never come. We hang on every word. Tomorrow, we begin again. Thank you. But are we getting all the message? Older, darker, psychopaths, serial killers ' handwriting-Research has shown that just 7% of human

1. Identify which types of body language could be interpreted as "negative." Types of body language could interpreted, such as your face is frowning or tight. Maybe you have a wrinkle between your brows or one of your brows is raised in annoyance or disbelief. This clearly states that you are not interested and do not have time, eye contact is in constant motion when speaking to others. Its one thing to look and watch the room but its another to constantly be focusing on everyone else instead of your client. You are distracted, and uninterested in the communication you should be participating in or that your self confidence is low, if you force a smile, its going to be transparent. In short you will be pegged a faker. Things that people will

What really got to me while reading, 'Body Language vs. Micro-Expressions' by Joe Navarro was when Navarro wrote in his essay "no single behavior is indicative of deceptions." I had to reread the sentence multiple times to make sure that I fully comprehended what it is that I was reading.

This project has opened so many new opportunities for my dad and I to allow for our relationship to grow. The process of the project was difficult because of my target person not being available to me every day. I had to develop different communication strategies to use when interacting with him either on the phone or in person. As I mentioned those interactions before, I had to remain positive for myself and for my dad so that we could efficiently be able to have meaningful conversation. It was not easy for me to have a positive attitude all the time since I had other external factors going on in my life as well. For my reactions, I tried to have a neutral facial expression or a tone when we would communicate and it was something that I did

Gaze and body language are visual conventions which help text two to shape the viewer’s understanding of American teenagers in the sixties.

One important thing I learned this week is that literacy appears in many different forms, each form being unique and essential to communications, in different ways and in different cultures. The perceptions you make of other people are influenced by visual cues from their body language, the language they speak, and your own ideas and experiences. I found the video by Mark Bowden (2013) extremely interesting and noticed that during the changes of his body language I did in fact begin to change my opinion of him. I can relate this to my life experiences by thinking about people I have come across who displayed different signs of body language, and why I would be more likely to approach those displaying the “friend” signals in a social situation

In this video, Amy Cuddy talks about the effects of changing body language on ourselves. She talks about how high power posing can actually make one feel powerful and confident even if the person does not feel powerful. According to Amy, maintaining a high or low power pose even for two minutes can affect the levels of testosterone and cortisol levels in the brain. Furthermore, she gives an example about how nonverbals govern our thinking process. For example, a person who does the high power pose is more likely to believe that he will win if he gambles while the person who performs the low power pose tends to believe that he will lose. Thus, the body language conveys the message to our brain about how one feels meaning our body can change

Social psychologist, Amy Cuddy in her persuasive/ informative Ted talk, “Fake It till You Make It,” argues that changing our posture for two minutes can have a significant and positive impact on the outcomes of our lives.She develops her claim by first stating what her speech was going to be based on,then goes more in depth by showing statistics and talking more about her research, then talks about the experiment she tried by making people try the power pose for two minutes, and finally she makes a personal connection by talking about her experience with feeling like an outcast. Cuddy’s purpose is to persuade/inform her audience on her research in order to prove how effective the power poses can actually be.She establishes an informative tone for the educated adults who enjoy learning.She succeeds to convince her audience because she shows her credibility, she connects with the audience, and she shows proof to back everything up.

This paper investigates thirteen published online resources that reports from research conducted on the relationship between body language and communication and the effectiveness of body language. The websites, however, provide different points of view, Farouk(2009), Suler(2017), and Whitburne(2014), mentions about eye contact to make better impression. Other resources, Borg( 2015), Farouk(2009), and Widrich(2016), and define lying differently and therefore, offer different examples of body language by lying. The last point by FBI(2012), Suler(2017), and Mlodinow(2013) is body language patterns to understand others. This

Expressions are very valuable, as they can prompt us regarding opportunities and threats in individuals and scenarios that we encounter. Happiness indicates an approachable person while anger signifies someone to stay away from. These two decisions are the most basic and simplest behavioral decisions.

In my presentation, I think my strengths were that I’ve used some good body language because at first try for my presentation, I didn’t used much eye contact which means that my audience wouldn’t be properly focusing on me. I had to redo it so then I tried to make some kind of eye contact with my audience. Eye contact is important because I had to keep them engaged and made sure that they were listening to me. I also used body gestures such as hand gestures to look appealing to my audience and to keep them entertained. If I didn’t do it and just had my hands in pocket or side of my body, they would wander off and stop listening to me. I used a bit of verbal exchanges because I greeted the audience at start of my presentation by saying hello and then went into the presentation. I could’ve extended it by asking them a question in middle of the presentation about their opinion.

The body in performance is an important tool. In many naturalistic plays, dialogue is just as important as the actions and body language which go along with it. In non-naturalistic plays, the emphasis on the body can be heightened through the abstraction of the piece. More focus can be placed on the body and its action by separating it from dialogue, or by removing dialogue altogether. In Samuel Beckett’s ‘Not I’, dialogue and action are separated, and given to two different characters. The Auditor in this play is a character with no dialogue in the play. Its only form of communication is a movement of “helpless compassion” which it repeats. Mouth, however, is a character whose body has been completely removed from the stage. In Pina Bausch’s ‘Café Muller’, the dialogue is removed completely, leaving the performers with only their bodies to convey emotions, stories, and meanings. In this essay, I will consider how the bodies (or lack thereof) function as a sign for Mouth and the Auditor in ‘Not I’, and for the performers in ‘Café Muller’

I remember teaching a men’s workshop and a gentleman raised his hand and said, “What do we do, man? Our wives and children, we’re doing this, they’re doing the other. They won’t work with me ...” And he keeps going on and on and on. So, I let him get it all out. When he was done, I simply said, “Well, now you know how God feels.”

Recommend Article Article Comments Print Article Share this article on Facebook Share this article on Twitter Share this article on Google+ Share this article on Linkedin Share this article on StumbleUpon Share this article on Delicious Share this article on Digg Share this article on Reddit Share this article on Pinterest