Youth Court Hearing Case Study

Placing a juvenile in a detention center early in the court process increases the risk that youths will be found to be delinquent and damage their prospects for future success. A majority of the youths that are placed in these facilities pose little or no threat to the public and essentially do not need to be there. This portion of the juvenile court process is detrimental to the future and mental aspects of a youth’s life. We desperately need to change the way that we handle the juvenile court system because we are only reinforcing the delinquent behavior that these youths have been exposed to. We need to focus on the rehabilitation and prevention efforts for these youths not the punishment aspect and until then (insert a better ending).

Today’s juvenile court system handles most cases involving those under the age of 18-year-old. This was not always the case and the ideal of a separate court system for adults and children is only about 100 years old. When looking at the differences that set juvenile courts apart, it is important to study the history and see how it developed over time.

On March 23, 2010, a cop drew closer Israel Leija, Jr. at a drive-in diner with a warrant for his capture. Leija continued to lead the police on a fast pursue on the interstate while occasionally calling the police dispatcher, saying that he had a weapon and threatening to shoot the officers pursuing him. The officers proceeded with their interest, and different officers sent spike strips. Trooper Chadrin Lee Mullenix, after discovering that other spike strips were set up, chose to seek after the substitute strategy of shooting at Leija's car keeping in mind the end goal to stop it. Despite the fact that he had not got preparing on this move, he educated one of the officers in quest for his arrangement and radioed his manager for authorization. Before accepting the permission of his boss, Mullenix got in position on a

The boy was charged after his mother brought him to state police barracks the day of the murder, saying her son told her "he got mad, lost his temper and grabbed a cane and put it around Novak's throat," police told The Associated Press.

Daniel first became involved in the justice system at age 16. His legal history includes five intake contacts and two violations of parole. Daniel has had an intake contact for a felony offense. None of the intake contacts were for felony offenses against another person. He has no history of escape. He has had three juvenile detention confinements and no other court ordered placements.

Studies have conducted that those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) are wrongly treated in juvenile justice systems. In this article, written by Kristi Holsinger and Jessica P. Hodge, these two authors go into great detail on the ways the LGBT community is wrongly treated within the juvenile justice system and analyze an interview that examines the challenges for the staff and for the women, as well as how to support those who are members of the LGBT community.

Millions of juveniles are processed through the juvenile court system, and the number has been growing for years. Judges and court officials have been looking for many ways to come up with alternatives to incarceration. There are several different alternatives to incarceration for juveniles currently that will be discussed. Incarceration has an impact on the society as well, even for those who have not been in trouble with the law before which is one of the reasons why alternatives have been evolved. Tensions between the established principals and the proposed methods determined the way in which early incarceration alternatives were introduced into legislation.

Kathleen Blanco governor of Louisiana from 2004 to 2008 said, “Think about it: Every educated person is not rich, but almost every education person has a job and a way out of poverty. So education is a fundamental solution to poverty.” Every year thousands of students exit our educational programs not knowing how to read or write. How can we help these people? Do we just to throw up our hands in the air hands and proclaim that is not my problem? According to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL), two thirds of students who cannot read proficiently by the end of fourth grade will end up in jail or welfare. 85% of all juveniles who interface with the juvenile court system are functioning illiterate. More than 60% of all prison inmates

The juvenile justice system is in place to ensure the protection of minors who are 18 years of age and younger. The juvenile justice system is where minors go to court who have committed criminal acts. A juvenile code is sanctioned through juvenile law. This code is overseen by the state law. The juvenile justice system uses rehabilitation as a goal in order to help these juveniles instead of simply punishing them for their crimes ("juvenile justice: an overview," 2015).

Detention hearing process has been frown upon and detested ever since juvenile courts were created. The original purpose of detention was to hold the juvenile in a secure location until intake could review the child’s case and make a decision.

The 22nd Judicial Circuit of Missouri/ Family Court- Juvenile Division is located in the city of St. Louis, Mo. The participants in this study are temporarily housed in the juvenile detention facility and are held on charges of allegedly committing a crime. The typical age ranging is between 11-17 years old, however, many are awaiting their day in court to determine their adjudication status by the presiding judge. Once, their status has been determined based on the evidence presented and the judge’s decision. The youth in question shall either be detained, released or placed in a court appointed program, which positively serves as a holistic approach in potentially addressing the concerns, that may have contributed to the adolescent being

In Tennessee there are multiple ways a Juvenile can be tried as an adult. If the court found reason to believe that “ the child committed the offense alleged, (2) the child is not committable to a mental institution, and (3) the interests of the community require that the child be placed under legal restraint” (Ojjdp, 2016). The law records different factors to be analyzed by the court in making these discoveries. For the most part, the juvenile court's choice is not instantly appealable; be that as it may, if a nonlawyer settles on the choice to exchange the case, a unique arrangement qualifies the child for an instant de novo rehearing criminal court level (Ojjdp, 2016). A child who has been transferred from a juvenile court by the choice of a non lawyer is qualified for

In the Juvenile Case #1, the client suspected of burglarizing and murdering the elderly lady should be tried in a Juvenile Court rather Adult court which would be in the best interest of the child. To begin with, the client has no juvenile delinquent record and had minimal behavioral issues in the Juvenile Hall, which aids to their side since they have a clean history and this is the first record of criminal behavior. With this in mind, it is plausible for the minor to change to become a better civilian through rehabilitation which is made possible by the Juvenile court. The client has proved their ability to improve themselves by earning a high school diploma and attending voluntary treatment programs which shows the success of the juvenile

It would be advantageous for taxpayers and juveniles if juvenile courts were split into two courts. I think taxpayers will be diminished of the weight of providing food for the preparing of adolescent court cases. The part of the adolescent court framework will prompt the inconvenience of appropriate discipline for youth wrongdoers in view of the seriousness of their cases and this will be leeway to the adolescents in light of the fact that their discipline will rely on upon the cases conferred. The part of the adolescent courts into two will improve coordination and joint effort among adolescent equity and social equity and this will be leeway to the adolescent courts. Citizens will likewise profit by the part of the adolescent

There is ongoing debate as to what should be done with juvenile courts. Should juvenile courts be abolished or just reformed? There are a number of reasons offered for each viewpoint, and the ultimate goal is trying to figure out which option would be most beneficial for juveniles. Juvenile delinquency is a continuous problem in the United States. It is also considered an issue that all of society needs to take part in trying to solve or at least diminish. Despite the number of social controls that can aid in dealing with delinquency much of the burden is placed on the juvenile justice system. It is well understood that the juvenile courts have a lot of imperfections. These imperfections are what caused the calls for reform or