1. With which of the international competitors listed in the case is it most interesting to compare Inditex’s financial results? What do comparisons indicate about Inditex’s relative operating economics? Its relative capital efficiency?
Even though H&M follows a strategy which differs significantly from Inditex’s approach it is the closest competitor from the financial point of view. H&M differs from Zara because it outsources all of the production, it is more price oriented and spends more money on advertising. But both companies are based in Europe, are fashion forward at lower price retailers, and have a strong international expansion strategy. Exhibit 6 indicates that the financial results of Inditex and H&M seem to
…show more content…
One Year Change in Market Value
Inditex: 47% H&M: 8%
Another factor which is interesting to examine is the One Year Change in Market Value. Inditex is on top position compared to all competitors with an impressive growth rate of 47%. H&M has the closest result and is the only company besides Inditex whose market value has been growing in 2001.
Inditex’s efficiency is the result of a more profitable investment strategy. By owning all the stores and manufacturing sites it is able to achieve control over all production processes and costs. The high number of stores may be also traced back to the increasing value of the property because Zara only buys stores in strategic areas (shopping malls, shopping arcades, pedestrian districts etc.) where competition boosts rents. Therefore total assets of Zara increase as well.
To sum up from the given information Inditex is more efficient in managing its finances. Its strategy of investing into high quality equipment such as a just-in-time manufacturing system, a huge warehouse close to its headquarter and an highly advanced communication system has lead to a Return on Investment rate of almost
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the financial performance of Johnson & Johnson. The analysis includes a brief background of the company, discussion over the economic outlook and market competition, followed by its financial performance, and article that talks about the company’s portfolio and credit ranking. Comments about the company’s future are also included along with the conclusion and references.
Zara is the flagship chain store of Inditex Group owned by Spanish tycoon Amancio Ortega. The group is located in Spain, where the first Zara store was opened. Zara has opposed the industry-wide trend towards turning fast fashion production to low-cost countries. Possibly its most atypical strategy is its policy of zero advertising; the firm opted to invest a portion of revenues in opening new stores instead. At the end of 2001, it ran 507 stores around the world. While its share of the group’s total sales were anticipated to fall by two or three percentage points each year, it would proceed to be the primary driver of the group’s growth for some time to come, and to
Zara is a retailing chain of Inditexthat specializes in high-fashion at reasonable prices. In the last 12 months, Inditex’s stock price has increased by 50% despite bearish market conditions. The 50% increase is due to the investor expectations of Inditex’s growth. Inditex’s growth can be contributed to the decisions it has made in creating a vertically integrated centralized process. The centralization of its vertically integrated operations in Europe provided it with its competitive advantage; however, I believe it will also make it fail if it decides to grow substantially into other markets. Financial Analysis compare to competitors In comparing Inditex financial performance against its competitors, it is apparent that Inditex is
1- With which of the international competitors listed in the case is it most interesting to compare Inditex's financial results? Why? What do comparisons indicate about Inditex's relative operating economics? Its relative capital efficiency? Note that while the electronic version of Exhibit 6 automates some of the comparisons, you will probably want to dig further into them.
Growth for Inditex is their expansion on the web, and internationally. Since 2011 Inditex considered online sales to be a new service for customers. They are highly focused on the ongoing improvement of the commercial transaction in this particularly new channel, so customers can enjoy the same products and quality of service on line as others do in stores. Zara for one started online sales in china in September of last year and Massimo Dutti and Zara home did the same in the U.S in October of last year. The goal was to extend e-business to the markets where the company operates with actual stores. According to Bloomberg business website, the world 's largest clothing retailer, reported accelerating revenue growth after an expansion of online sales and store openings help drive a five percent profit increase last year (Jarvis, Mulier, 2015). With the decision to enter new markets and extend the reach of online sales, the company is staying ahead of most of competitors. After boosting the number of stores by five percent to 6,683 through January, Inditex plans to open as many as 480 outlets this year, including three in New York. Net sales for Inditex reached 15.9 billion
This means, H&M, Zara can actually focus all their efforts on clothing whereas, M&S could not do this. You may think that offering a huge variety of products is a strength and a good thing, but if you actually think about it, it is not. This allows other companies like H&M to focus on the clothing which makes better fashion industry wise. A threat Mark and Spencer faces is that other fast fashion companies are able to focus on clothing whereas, M&S cannot which is quite a
Inditex, as stated on its website, is one of the world’s largest fashion distributors: nearly 6 million of items were put on the market in 2006 (Figure 1). With eight sales concepts Zara, Pull and Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho, Zara Home and Kiddy 's Class they boast nowadays 3,701 stores in 68 countries, distributed as shown in Table 1.
The following financial report provides an analysis of the financial ratios of David Jones with its close competitor in the retail sector, Myer. The financial ratios analyzed include profitability ratios, leverage ratios, efficiency ratios and market ratios for the two companies. The analysis utilizes individual company time-series analysis as well as industry cross-sectional analysis with the aim of determining the competitiveness of David Jones relative to its close competitor Myer.
The world’s largest fashion retailer, Zara’s Indian unit Inditex trent which is a 51:49 Joint venture partnership between Spanish retailer Inditex SA with Tata Group’s retail arm trent has witnessed a phenomenal rise in India’s fashion retail sector. Incorporated in 2009-2010, Zara India has been the fastest fashion brand in India to clock profits. In the financial year 2011, Zara India made net profits of 22.5 crore while in the financial year 2012, it made net profits of 38.3 crore on sales of 260 crore. In the year 2013, Zara clocked a staggering 56% growth in sales as it earned net profits of 45.19 crore on annual sale of 411.19 crore. According to Economic Times, this is “over six times more than the country's largest apparel brand Louis Philippe and a tad higher than the country's largest department chain Shoppers Stop”. Zara has 13 stores in Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore. It is believed that the company is
With H&M’s many strengths come many weaknesses. Although buying in large amounts keeps prices affordable, it can also lead to overstocking, and later the lowering of an already affordable price, as well as a lack of control over product production. Uncontrollably, their target customer base is highly affected by the changing macro economic conditions. They are new to the United States online store compared to their competitors (Gap, Zara, Forever 21). Their clothing is usually not original due to how they follow the trends of luxury brands on
* Procurement: As it is the second Europe’s cloth retailer company, for the production H&M uses a lot of material and workers so its mains recourses are material, labour and energy. That is why small changes in prices can affect the company’s profit a lot, and the fact that it does not own any manufactories causes some problems in controlling the production’s prices. However, not owning the factories can be an advantage in some cases. Indeed, if a problem appears, H&M can easily change its suppliers. Moreover, due to its huge size, H&M can easily manipulate with its suppliers to have the best quality at the lowest production’s price.
This concise summary will introduce and also, briefly, analyze and summarize the case at hand: Zara: IT for Fast Fashion and the issues Mr. Salgado and Mr. Sanchez are facing alongside the rest of Zara and Inditex’s management. The problems introduced are all major concerns that are currently affecting or risking to potentially affect the company in the future. These include issues with the current operating system and point-of-sale systems the company operates. They provide limited visibility throughout inventory levels resulting in customer and employee dissatisfaction alongside inefficient time consumption due to
Spanish retail group Inditex has reported a 28% rise in nine-month profits, helped by improved control over costs. The group - which owns the Zara fashion store chain - recorded a net profit for the nine months to 31 October of 520.5m euros ($621m; £351m).
1- With which of the international competitors listed in the case is it most interesting to compare Inditex's financial results? Why? What do comparisons indicate about Inditex's relative operating economics? Its relative capital efficiency? Note that while the electronic version of Exhibit 6 automates some of the comparisons, you will probably want to dig further into them.
This report contains the analysis of value and culture of reputable apparel retailer H&M, as well as three analysis method, which is PETEL, Porter’s five forces, and VRIO framework, to analyse the external influence factors, competitors, and competitive advantages of H&M.