Zimbabwe Should Not Have To Suffer This Way
In recent years, Zimbabwe has been prone to increasing violence as a result of a corrupt government. There have been many instances reported to “HRWO” (Human rights watch organization) of personal accounts where landowners and workers alike have been subjected to beatings, pillaging, threats, and overall persecution. These acts of terrorism are the products of a military coup that is currently in power called the Zanu-PF and orchestrated by the veterans of the war for Zimbabwe’s Independence.
The world must not stand by and watch these crimes against humanity take place with a complacent eye any longer. This tyrannical powers’ regime of terror which enacted the “Zimbabwe land reform and
…show more content…
The election was a landslide and the days of a white owned tyrannical government was over, or at least that’s what the native people were led to believe.
One British condition in the Lancaster Agreements was the ensured protection of white farm owners for the first ten years of the new government. These conditions simply said were “willing seller, willing buyer” meaning that land would not be acquired forcefully from any already functional farms. After the term of the agreement was up, the government had control of redistributing the land to the people. For the first ten years redistribution was slow and most of the land was still in the hands of the white commercial farmers. During this period President Mugabe took out enormous loans from the World Bank and invested it in institutions designed to fit the luxurious standards of the elite. They awarded the majority of usable land to the elite of Zimbabwe, while the majority of the country was rapidly growing poorer, and paying for the government’s outstanding loans through a process called “Economic Structural Adjustment Program.” This is a program the World Bank and the IMF (International Monetary Fund) setup to ensure that the loans given are paid back in a
State Crimes are defined as “acts that are largely committed, instigated or condoned by governments and their officials” (International State Crime initiative). These crimes are considered to be very serious crimes in society today, due to the fact that they are either committed or condoned by governmental personnel with the aim of achieving certain goals. Having said that, scholars today do not have the knowledge of how important these crimes are since it violate international and criminal law within that state. Eugene McLaughlin identified four categories of state crime; Political crimes, crimes by security, economic crimes and social and cultural crimes. However, I will focus on the two that are more widely acknowledged Political crime is corruption and censorship, a state has the right to label a behaviour as political crime if it’s seen as a threat to the state. Crime by security has to do with genocide and torture, a great example of crime by security is the Rwanda Genocide that occurred in 1994 which ended up killing 800,000 citizens in just a few weeks. According to Grabosky and Stohl (2010), state crimes can be divided into six main types; State terror against another state, state terror against private interests, State facilitation of another state’s terrorism, state terror against its own citizens, state facilitation of private actors and political terror scale. In this essay, I will be mainly concentrating on the Rwanda Genocide, Libyan civil war of 2011 and
The dependence on foreign aid and a westernization of culture that happened to Zambia has happened to indigenous people across the world. This is similar to the Tiwi who were used
Due to increasing inter-ethnic violence combined with a long history of political violence, Kenya has been described as a “volatile political and social environment”(QUOTE). Furthermore, high youth unemployment and widespread poverty motivate and entice individuals to seek out terrorist groups to join. These elements intertwined with the institutionalisation of political violence, have been identified as the specific causes of political violence in Kenya. To avoid the recurrence of political violence, the strategy was to re-examine the legal measures available and focus especially on humans rights and democratisation. As Kenneth Roth, an executive director of Human Rights Watch, states, “For Kenya to overcome the legacies of political violence, it has only two choices: justice or impunity”(QUOTE). Moreover, in order for citizens to have a better future, victims and the socioeconomic causes of political violence must be addressed. In other words, there has to be an emphasis placed on rehabilitation and “tackling poverty and inequality . . . particularly among youth”(QUOTE). With the adoption of these preventive elements in political violence and counter-terrorism strategies, Kenya has an opportunity to confront past injustices and bring about substantial
United Nations members, and fellow concerned citizens, the world must discuss with the consequences of the initiation of apartheid. Apartheid, the separation of races completely, has become a horrible era in South African history, and has killed many innocent victims. However, the blacks of South Africa brought death upon themselves. Therefore, please pledge your support to the whites of South Africa in an attempt to save as many lives as possible in as short a time as we have. One must acknowledge that
The Native Americans had nothing to lose at this point other than their culture and beliefs, since their land has been taken
I can’t help but assume that the reason why no one has yet to put an end to Mugabe’s ruling is because there
The avowal that the apartheid ‘vision for democracy’ necessitated state terror and repression is evident when examining the South African apartheid system between 1960 -1994. The system of apartheid spiked significant internal resistance, hence, the ideology for apartheid stems from the creation of a white state surrounded by economically interdependent and politically dependent black states, which required state terror and repression to ensure mounting resistance and international condemnation did not abolish the apartheid system. The government responded to a series of popular uprisings and protests with police brutality, which increased support for armed resistance. Detentions were set without trial, torture, censorship and the outlawing of political oppositional organizations such as The African National Congress, the Black Conscious Movement, the Azanian Peoples Organisation, The Pan Africanist Congress and the United Democratic Front, were all a result of the apartheid government due to political resistance.
Propaganda was an elaborate and essential tool used extensively by Hitler and the Nazi's as well as the Hutu's during their terrorizing reign of Germany and throughout Europe and the Hutu's horrific acts of genocide that happened because of a culmination of deep ethnic tensions brewing over a century and intense political corruption. Not only was it used to promote and endorse the party and its leader's extreme racist values but also to mask the horrifying truths of what was to become known as the Holocaust and the Rwanda Genocides.
Renowned Zimbabwean revolutionary Robert Mugabe states, “Cooperation and respect for each other will advance the course of human rights worldwide. Confrontation, vilification, and double standards will not.” This quote vocalizes what human rights are and the steps necessary for liberty. However, this set of rights are constantly in violation of mankind itself in innumerable instances. The most evident event that violated these rights is the Holocaust in World War II. This Holocaust was the persecution of Jews and people deemed “unfit” by Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazi Party during the nineteen thirties and forties. Though this catastrophic event caught the attention of the world, this is not the only time in history human rights being in violation. The Japanese effort in World War II to create biological weapons for the war is another example of human rights being taken away by mankind. After this war, the United Nations created a “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Article Five stating, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
“It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation. Two important tribes have accepted the provision made for their removal at the last session of Congress, and it is believed that their example will induce the remaining tribes also to seek the same obvious advantages.” (Jackson, 1830) This quote from President Andrew Jackson showed the happiness of the “white settlers” of stripping the homeland from the Native American people. This was the beginning of something tragic were many died from hunger and disease, The Trail of Tears.
Apartheid, the strict division between white and colored people, for South Africans has always been a big issue. The man who stopped difficult ways of life for people and communities in South Africa was also their president, Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela was a man who put his life on the line to bring people together. He was involved with organizations that would eventually help to end apartheid throughout his life and lead countless amounts of peaceful acts that put an end to this divide. Mandela was even arrested for what he was trying to accomplish. It was difficult, but once he was released from prison, he finished what he and many others had started, he put a stop to apartheid. Nelson Mandela caused for apartheid to be
Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be considered inferior because of your race? The people of South Africa had to endure racial inferiority during the era of apartheid. The apartheid laws the government of South Africa made led to an unequal lifestyle for the blacks and produced opposition.
Afternoon once again some more on Zimbabwe...DISCUSS THE RISE AND EXPANSION OF THE MUTAPA STATE. (NOV 2008)
With China, Zimbabwe would “never walk alone” claimed Emerson Mnangagwa, speaker of the Zimbabwe parliament (qtd in Obiorah 39). Nonetheless, several experts have condemned the Chinese government for fueling the ongoing conflicts in Zimbabwe and for helping the authoritarian government in its repression of any opposition. China has been heavily criticized for shipping armament to Zimbabwe that would ultimately distributed to the military and the militia that would help keep the opposition down during the 2008 elections. Although China adopts its non-interference stance, such types of trades are ultimately affecting the country. The delivery of those arms coincided with a time of extreme hostilities in the country and many pointed fingers at the Chinese government for blatant human rights violations (Spiegel and Le Billon 324, 330).
opinion of how the country works as he grew up, and when he was 16 the