preview

Zinn's Inequality

Decent Essays

Mitchell Byron Mrs. Lichterman ALC Honors 22 September Zinn’s critique on the inequality of wealth and the American war effort during the American revolution is correct, while his idea of injustice in the American Constitution during this time is not completely accurate. Zinn states that the wealthy primarily benefitted from the revolution and that the American war effort took its biggest toll on the lower class which is true. However, his claims that the Constitution also benefited the wealthy class more than the lower class are not supported by sufficient evidence. The Revolution gave wealthy even more of an advantage and helped keep the lower class down. The founding fathers had decided to declare their independence …show more content…

Zinn proclaims that the Constitution, “serves the interests of a wealthy elite, but also does enough for small property owners, for middle-income mechanics and farmers, to build a broad base of support. The slightly prosperous people who make up this base of support are buffers against the blacks, the Indians, the very poor whites. They enable the elite to keep control with a minimum of coercion, a maximum of law-all made palatable by the fanfare of patriotism and unity.” In reality the Constituion itself does its best to create equality between the classes. The constitution makes everybody in America (other than blacks and women) an equal vote. Just because you are a wealthy man doesn’t mean your vote counts any more or less than a poor man’s vote. Many people argue that the rich are still able to better influence American politics because they can more easily hold positions in office. While this may be true, it is not as a result of the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that you need to be reach in order to hold a position of leadership. It simply says you need to be elected. The constitution also made taxes a percentage of one’s income rather than a fixed amount. This may seem trivial, but it did not necessarily need to be this way. The constitution also gives many rights regardless of wealth. One example of this is legal representation. If you have committed a crime and you are unable to afford an attorney, one is appointed to you for free by the state that you committed the crime in. This is just another example of the Constitution attempting to bring equality between the classes in

Get Access