Zionism Research Paper

Zionism has two main roots coming from two different places. The definition of Zionism is the desire of Jews to return to their homeland better known as Israel. This is the first root of Zionism. Zionsim is considered to be religious because the Orthodox Jews believed that only God could send them to their home. After many conflicts with Jews trying to join society and being rejected Theoder Herzl started the movement of Zionism. This is considered to be the second root and cause Zionism to also become secular. Many Jews do not believe in Zionism because they see it as a political move. Theoder Herzl wanted secular Jews to have a place called

With the Jewish expulsion from the land of Palestine, from the Romans. Their lives depended on endeavoring to survive in the land that they were coerced on. For some, assimilation was the only way to survive. It was either stay ostracized or assimilate and endeavor to become something. During the 18000s an incipient conception emerged from the Jewish people in many different counties. This conception came to what Zionism is, a way for the Jewish people to become a whole. Some Zionist vigorously repudiated the conception of assimilation to these countries. Some verbally expressed that assimilation is a slap to the Jewish people coerced out of the land of Palestine. While others verbally express living in the countries was like being ghost

As of recent years, with the rise of right-wing, nationalistic politicians in Israel, the hunger for settlement of Palestine has increased. Seeing the land as theirs to take, more and more Jewish settlements have been improved and expanded on in the West Bank, culminating and high profile confrontations between the new Jewish settlers and the Palestinian

When asking someone there first thought about Israel, each person will have their own version of what they believe that it is. One might say that it is the land of the Jews, while others say that it is Jesus Christ’s birthplace. The excerpts from My Promised Land by Ari Shavit capture the true essence of what Israel really is.

Before anyone can comprehend the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one must understand the theory of Zionism. Theodor Herzl was the first Jew to have the idea of creating Israel. He was a witness of the Dreyfus affair, in which a Jewish officer was accused of treason, solely because he was Jewish. Herzl also witnessed mobs of people shouting “Death to the Jews”. This was the last straw for Herzl. Herzl decided that there needed to be a change so he made it one of his life goals to create a successful movement in which Jews founded a Jewish state. One of his main arguments was that discrimination against Jews could be eliminated if they had their own Jewish State, and so modern Zionism was formed. The idea of modern Zionism is so pertinent to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because much of the reason for Israel becoming a Jewish state is behind the fact that Jews were perpetrated throughout the years before Zionism even came into play of the situation.

Further quoting Mavshan, Hebrew as a “nation building tool” was used with great success by the Zionist movement. This was used to combat the effects of “dispora” on the languages of the Jewish people. Not only did the Zionist movement encourage the use of Hebrew through extensive educational programs, but they also engaged in “active condemnation of alternative” languages. The article articulates this “battle” for the Hebrew language by documenting the early push for the national language in the city of Tel-Aviv.

Labeled “Zionism,” this movement advocated for the return of Jews to Palestine, and that Jews constitute one nation and should have a state of their own. This was not met with wholehearted support, however. Both Jews and non-Jews disputed the need for, and right to exist, of the Jewish state. Jews that clung to more traditional values emphasized that the Zionists did not speak for all Jews, and that many do not wish for such a state to exist. Additionally, non-Jews disliked the particularity of the Zionist movement, viewing it as holding Jews as separate, and more significant, than other peoples.

The Zionist movement is the movement that supported the belief that the Jewish people deserved a homeland of their own that was isolated from outside countries. Zionism acted as a government of the Jewish people during the period of time they were making Israel a State. Within the Zionist movement, there were several sub-parties that acted in opposition to each other. The biggest parties were the Mapai, which was a Zionist labor

With little resistance possible against the German persecution, tensions heightened between the Zionists and the British in 1940 as a direct result of the continued British opposition of securing Jewish statehood despite Zionist offers to form Jewish fighting units with the British against the Germans. Consequently, the Jewish Agency’s efforts to rescue Jews from Europe and transport them to Palestine were prevented by sinking illegal transport ships filled with refugees, resulting in the formation of several underground paramilitary groups such as the Irgun and LEHI. By building up the supply of weapons, conducting guerilla attacks on local British forces and police, and by arranging the illegal entry of refugees from Europe, Jewish fighters and Zionist leaders were able to help thousands of Holocaust survivors break the British blockade and reach Palestine between 1945 and 1948. Additionally, Bickerton and Klausner point to the success of the Yishuv in creating a situation that forced the British to take the issue to the UN and subsequent activities related to Europe’s Jewish displaced persons, as being highly influential to the formation of Israel after the Holocaust. The Yishuv, fired by shame, agony and

Anti-Semitism’s violent history began in 250 C.E. ancient Carthage with the expulsions of Jews. Over the centuries historians have gathered a list of 219 incidents of forced conversions, expulsions, enslavement, land confiscation, massacres, live burnings, arrests, torture, banishments, Inquisitions, slaughtering, mass murder and the Holocaust without including the incidents that happened in Palestine before and after the official creation of the state of Israel (Grossman 198). Rita Simon states in her journal Anti-Semitism the World Over in the Twenty-first Century that Jews became the

Not long after his proposal, in 1904, Herzl died a hero (Vital). Herzl singlehandedly gave himself and his soul to cause of the oppressed Jewish people. Herzl had come closer to the restoration of the Jewish people than any of his predecessors in a long time. His predecessors - Moses Hess, Leon Pinsker, and Zvi Hirsch Kalischer - have been forgotten as they were unable to craft a practical plan for the Jewish situation. Herzl displayed the personal charm, the qualities of leadership and the powers of imagination which characterized his whole career as the leader of the Zionist movement (Grayzel). Accompanied by his confident demeanor and hope, Herzl proved success throughout his incredible journey. Little did he know that almost 50 years later, after two dreadful wars, his dream would become a reality with the birth of a Jewish State. Ultimately, Herzl left a legacy for the Jewish people. His responsibility has fallen into the hands of every Jew everywhere in the world (Ignatieff). Today, Jews must fight for the existence of their Jewish State and support its valued existence in the world. With the increase of political tensions between Arab countries and Israel, Jews must take action, like Herzl, to protect what was so dear to them throughout their history (“Arab-Israeli Conflict”). In eight years, Herzl created a movement, established

The investigation assesses demographic shifts to Palestine in the context of the Arab-Israeli Conflict. It more specifically inquires about the impact of Jewish immigration on Palestine in terms of the effects it had on Jewish-Arab relationships in Palestine. It seeks to determine the extent the third, fourth, and fifth aliyahs of 1919-1939 had on the economic development of the Israeli State and its social implications. Monographs and general texts will be used to provide background on the conflict, including the rise of Zionism, the British Mandate, the White Paper, and the Peel Commission. This context will also be used to critically analyze the role of Jewish immigration to Palestine and the role it played in land reforms, rioting, and the implementation of restrictions set by the British government on Palestine. Two secondary sources, William L. Cleveland’s A History of the Modern Middle East and Howard M. Sachar’s A History of

In the years just after World War II, Zionism (the desire to rebuild a Jewish national presence in the Promised Land) became a popular Jewish cause all around the world. Many Jews who were not practicing Judaism at all with religion became involved with the establishment of the State of Israel. Even today, many years after the successful founding of the State of Israel, there are Jews whose only real tie to Judaism is their belief in Zionism and their support for the State of Israel. They are joined by many Jews who are members of synagogues and support a modern Jewish religious movement, but who also find their prime identity as Jews in the Zionist cause.

Religion is a vital part of daily life in every Middle Eastern country, informing the ways in which most ordinary citizens understand politics as well as their own place in the world. Today, the political left in Israel views the Israel state more as a protector of the Jewish community than as a strictly religious state. On the right, Zionism is broadly viewed as an effort to realize God’s intention that the Jewish people establish a Kingdom of God in that specific land. Today, Judaism

For many centuries, Judaic and Arabian societies have engaged in one of the most complicated and lengthy conflicts known to mankind, the makings of a highly difficult peace process. Unfortunately for all the world’s peacemakers the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly the war between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, is rooted in far more then ethnic tensions. Instead of drawing attention towards high-ranking officials of the Israeli government and Hamas, focus needs to be diverted towards the more suspect and subtle international relations theory of realism which, has imposed more problems than solutions.