How would you feel if you were captured and placed in a confined enclosure? I don't think you would like that, would you. The history of zoos began 3000 years ago in ancient Egypt, when pharaohs would demand wild animals to be captured for their amusement. Yet today zoos still confine wild animals which is cruel. This is cruel because they keep animals in enclosures that aren't the same as the animals natural habitat, creates stress behavior, and is just a collection of unhappy animals. So although zoos have become a huge part of the American culture, in the eyes of animals, these establishments are cruel, stressful, and don't provide the animals with their natural habitat, and therefore I believe that zoos should not catch and confine wild animals. Most zoos still keep animals in enclosures, but these enclosures do not let the animals live the way they would if they were in their natural environment. I think that no matter how much trees or branches you put into the enclosure, how nice the background painting is, it doesn't compare with the natural habitat of the animal. The zoo animals have to spend days, weeks, and years in the same enclosure that makes their lives very tedious. For example elephants in the wild are used to traveling many miles in herds these are very social creatures. But when put in zoos they are kept in …show more content…
Stress behavior include repetitive movement, pacing back and forth, head bobbing, rocking, sitting motionless, or biting the bars of their enclosure. The scientific behavior for captive animals is abnormal repetitive behavior or ARB. These can be caused by depression, boredom, and psychoses. An example of repetitive behavior is an elephant swinging its trunk back and forth, which is a sign of stress. Zoos also give animals antidepressants to control the behavior problems of some
To answer this complex question, philosophy professor Bryan Norton poses some additional concerns relevant to this issue. He notes that if in fact keeping these animals in captivity is ethical, then we must also discuss what specifically humans want to conserve (Norton 15). Is it limited just to animal species, or can it extend to populations, ecosystems, and natural processes? If we simply identify wild animals, then we must ask ourselves if we are preserving a wild species if the animals themselves are forced to spend their lives in captivity? He mentions a common analogy used among zoo professionals who refer themselves to a modern day Noah’s ark, preserving each species by removing individuals for conservation. If zoos represent a sanctuary from extinction, then we must also address if there will ever be a natural habitat to reintroduce the animals into, or if they be forced to remain on the zoos “Ark” indefinitely (Norton 16). Though the work of various ethical scholars and philosophers may not be able to provide a concrete answer to all of the respective questions, I will discuss the concept of reintroduction when analyzing the third argument of this essay.
Zoos across the world claim to be safe, suitable homes that replicate habitats of animals that are usually found in the wild. However, there is no possible way for wild habitats to be replicated well enough for animals in captivity to thrive, animals are often separated and withheld from living as they would in the wild. Despite their argument of being educational for visitors, the only thing they are teaching the public is that it is ok to take animals out of the wild and lock them up for their own enjoyment. Regardless of these claims, zoos are inhumane.
Animals are deprived of their natural habitat when transferred from the wild open space of the wild only to be fenced inside a limited habitat. Peta.org explains “Elephants typically walk up to 30 miles in just one day, but Lucy, the lone elephant at the Edmonton Zoo, is locked inside a barn… spends most of her time indoors…”. This doesn’t only apply to elephants, but to many other animals. Preventing them from thriving, because of the limited space provided per animal. Additionally, this leads to health problems because of the restricted amount of movement, health problems like arthritis. However zoos are not only causing physical harm, but mentally making animals sick causing many cases of depression. Trapping animals in cages stressed them out and can make them unhappy taking matters into their own hands trying to kill themselves according to
Zoos have been around for 4,000 years, for many years people have gone to zoos to see wild animals up close. What people do not know is animals don't have the best interest in being in a zoo. The article, "Zoos: The Historical Debate" from Globalanimal.org discusses some pros (positive sides) and cons (negative sides) of zoos. As well as how millions of people visit zoos around the world and how some argue that zoos are either places of education and conversation or unnecessary prisons. After reading the article a logical conclusion is zoos are detrimental to animals.
Zoos present a certain blend of nature and culture. They have always provided a way to bring natural wildlife and urban Americans together as a means of entertainment. Yet, throughout the years the role of zoos have changed. Though once used for amusement, zoos are now being used for education on preservation and the welfare of endangered species. One may wonder where and how the idea of zoos started and just how they, and the environment around them, have changed throughout history.
Initially, zoos have improved a great deal over the last four thousand years. They do not have any more cages or steel bars. They have continuously tried to provide exceptional and friendlier environments for these wild animals.
There have been a lot of problems with animals in zoos. It has gotten to the point where zoos are hated and looked upon as a places of animal torture. Are zoos really that bad? Turns out, they are. They do not have enough space, they do not allow the animals to communicate with each other, and they sell the animals to cruel circuses.
The El Paso Zoo is a well-known for making everyone’s arrival one to remember. Each time I would go to the zoo, I always leave with a smile on my face because of the great service they bring towards El Paso. The reason why I decided to write about the zoo is because I was once a worker there. It is marvelous seeing all of those magnificent animals. They must be at least twenty different types of species we have in El Paso. Which is totally awesome.
The animal king (Marahambae) died of a rare disease that made him slowly deteriorate mentally and physically.Doctors tried to help but there is no cure to it. The animals in the Nevada state zoo are extremely upset about the tragic death. Many of the animals are furious and are running mad around their cages. The animals begin to escape their enclosures and helping others break free as well! You the zookeeper are the only one working because all your co-workers quit because they felt they were in danger. Your boss leaves it up to you to get all the animals back in their habitat so the zoo can reopen. You terrified or ot have to get the job done before the zoo is closed
Being a second grader, the Atlanta Zoo was an alternate universe. Traveling with my Girl Scout troup caused lots of chattering and giggling. We found ourselves starting out with the flamingo exhibit. Being the morning, the flamingos were very active and showed off their brightly colored pink feathers to me. Moving on we visited all other kinds of birds like the Ground Hornbill, Lappet faced Vulture, Cassowary, Kookaburra, and many more. I could not believe how many birds there were and all with different markings. After gazing above tree we decided to look down inside the rocks at a Giant Tortoise. The shell helped to camouflage the big tortoise well, but not well enough for we soon caught sight of him. After seeing some of the coolest animals
Being new to Zooing, there were lots of adjustments from living to eating to have so much more free time. In addition to those, learning the new cultures and other’s cultures all mixing together was an alteration. First big adjustment was getting used to living in a xob. For most Zooings there are xob’s, or living spaces, where two strangers from different lineages and village groups come together to live in a small area. Another example of modifying to a new culture, is in Zooing was the ritual of consuming food, called pigging out, this is where you gather with other Zooers and consume nutrients at large circular stands. However, the greatest, infrequent culture ritual variation involves very insufficient amount of Zooing people, compared to the inhabitants of the rest of campus. This rare ritual is a completely optional, and it is where individual Tenduts come to gather and preform very dangerous exercise. The exercise is called Llawing, the Tenduts who partake in it are called Verticals. These people are searching for physical and mental strengthening, while also yearn for accomplishment to show off and maintain a higher status.
You could say that, 90% of my family lives in this little town in Missouri, near St. Louis called Robertsville. I think they make up 99% of the population there. They should just name the city Prichardville.
Calgary zoo’s mission is to is to take action in conserving wildlife and wild areas and to also inspire others to do the same. Also, to be a leader in Canada’s wildlife conservation. One change I believe they should make would be to monitor their animals more closely. I feel this way because there have been a few stories where a lot of animals have died in the Calgary zoo. For example, 7 penguins died, 200 fish died due to water quality problems, and there was an otter that was killed by getting tangled in a pair of pants. Two benefits to these changes would be. That the zoo would have a better reputation with animal well-being which would be good because it would bring in more tourism which would not only reflect well on Calgary, the animals and the environment, but would also help bring in more revenue. Also, by monitoring animals more closely, hopefully fewer animals will die. And some stories that support my claim include:
Last week I had the opportunity to visit the Los Angeles zoo on a beautiful, sunny Thursday (October 19th). Although I arrived off schedule which left a minimal amount of time to observe primates, I managed my time well. After being told that the larger animals get put away earlier, I figured my first stop would be at an ape enclosure. The ape I chose to see that day was the gorilla. The time that I began my observation was at approximately 3:05. At that time only one ape was quite visible and he was sitting at the front making eye contact with me making it seem as if he is HABITUATED. Next, post gorilla watching, I had the chance to take a gander at the ring railed lemurs at 3:40. These prosimians all had their own personalities which interested me deeply. Lastly, and certainly not least on my journey through the LA zoo, I had the chance of looking at the mandrills which were once classified as baboons. Considering that two baby mandrills were present and only a month old, this was my favorite exhibit to see because of their high energy and randomness of actions.
The sun was shining, the sky was spotted with clouds, and the wind was whistling as it passed through the trees. Overall, it was the perfect day to visit the zoo. Smiling, happy children bounded beside me as I walked underneath the large, blue and yellow sign announcing “The Colorado Zoo.” As I walked onto the sidewalk, I looked out over the “habitats.” The big, colorful signs advertising the exotic animals “brought from all over the world!” Animals that were taken from their home, taken from their habitats, and taken to a world where they are put on display. Animals who are forced to live out their lives in zoos in unhealthy, degrading, and devastating ways.