Essay about apeuro dbq on the poor

The historical definitions of worthy and unworthy poor come from the early 1600’s for dealing with the poor. Family was expected to take care of other poor family members (Hansan, 2011). The worthy poor are to be considered true victims of poverty. They were pregnant women, people who are truly unwell and unable to work or someone over the age of sixty. These were the people that were allowed to beg on the street since the government deemed them worthy (Martin, 2014, p.21). The unworthy poor were the legally defined drifter, or beggars. If people were able to work but they were without a job, they were whipped, marched through the streets, returned to where they came from, or thrown in jail. Repeat offenders of begging often had ears cut off or were killed (Martin, 2014, p.21).

It was obvious that the same new measures were needed primarily to save money on the rates but also possibly to tackle the causes of poverty. No solution appeared other than the complete abolishment of the poor allowance, which few wanted. Under the allowance system, one could work and receive outdoor relief in the form of cash payments as long as you resided in the parish of your birth. This system was said to encourage laziness as the poor would have no incentive to work hard or to respect their employers as they knew that their parish would look after them. The allowance system was regarded by the ruling class as an ‘unmitigated evil’.

Between 1450 and 1700, attitudes toward the European poor changed dynamically, roughly following a three-part cycle. In the late 1400's, the poor were regarded with sympathy and compassion; generous aid from both public and religious institutions was common. By the 16th Century, however, the poor were treated with suspicion and harsh measures, to ensure that they were not becoming lazy, using welfare as a substitute for labor. Beginning in the 17th Century, the attitudes toward the poor again shifted, returning to more sympathetic views and responses, though many members of the upper-class still retained the negative outlook on the destitute of the 16th Century.

DBQ: Analyze attitudes toward and responses to “the poor” in Europe between approximately 1450 and 1700.

People in authority tend to disregard those who and that which does not benefit them, since the poor did not seem to benefit anybody, people in authority found them useless. For instance, Emperor Charles V wrote an imperial decree for the Netherlands in 1531, where he stated that alms should not be given freely to the Europeans living in poverty, in doing so not only does he believe they will fall into idleness but he thinks they will take advantage of this and live their lives based off of alms, and that it will soon lead to all evils (document 2). He states that “beggars and their children will abandon their trade or occupation for a wicked and contemptible life… above all those who are poor and sick, and other indigents unable to earn

As time progressed new ideas came into society. Instead of giving freely to the poor, they should be made to work for their money, as Emperor Charles V expressed in his imperial decree for Netherlands. (d-4) “Experience shows that begging for alms . . . errors and abused will result . . .” therefore, he proposed that only the sick and those unable to work should receive aid. An English doctor noted that beggars, who came to his house, expressed a desire to live a sick but easy life rather than to get well and have to work hard to earn a

In this case, England seems to be at an economic advantage in relation to poverty compared to third world countries. This quote can be related to the economic base portion of Marxist theory where welfare is promoted and a high percentage of the population uses it. Much like America, England encourages a capitalistic economic base. They believe the people under welfare housing will soon prosper and become a key component in the working class in the future. By providing them with such resources such as shelter, food, and medical care just to name a few, they shall soon overcome this tough phase in their life and break free from the cycle of poverty. However this is not the case. Many people stay in these welfare housing units for generations and are not doing their part to help leave their state of poverty, rather their succumbing to the presumption that things are not going to get better for them and they should just enjoy the free ride. The people living in poverty in England are given the necessities of life such as food, shelter, and even entertainment. When you think of poverty however, these do not come to mind. Usually you would think of the economic state of the

After being moved to unfamiliar land (and the Europeans took the best lands for themselves), they could not feed themselves well. They could not hunt or farm on bad land, and the food and money sent to them monthly was not nearly enough. Also, they did not know how to do irrigation systems,

Wanted to create classes like in europes nobles but abused natives and epidemics undermined economic condition

The society is in such a way that it falls into categories of people who belong to different social classes and this creates a difference in the way individuals lead their lifestyle, and in the way individuals interact with each other. The working poor refer to a social group which develops as a result of the social inequalities which exist in the society. The population comprises of individuals who put a lot of effort in their activities but still fail to witness growth and development in their socio-economic being. It is normally wrong to categorize such persons as being lazy, and instead, one may argue that nature dictates the fate of these beings.

The author is able to draw his audience in emotionally by speaking of such countries, and how it eventually ties in to the United States, stating that “(if) a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich,” (3) concluding the connection between the U.S. and those countries who have a lower living standard.

The Working Poor: Invisible in America is a story that takes personal stories and accounts of people lives to describe the injustices that people face every day. Poverty is damaging to both the economy and the people who face it. Many times social policies are created to assist the people who are working but still struggle to get basic needs like food, utilities, gas, and medical. Poverty is a perpetuating cycle that is intended to keep the poor oppressed and discriminated against. Respectfully, this critique will address the social problems that are identified in the book, the major social welfare policy issues, the social values and beliefs that are critical and the implications for future social welfare policy and social work practice.

to usually show poor people being lazy, dirty and homeless, having no morals or goals

They created a product for the bottom of the pyramid that was initially introduced into the Gauteng province but later expanded into two other provinces, Kwazulu-Natal and the Free State.

Poverty and inequality exist in every developed culture and often are only patched in order for society to continue upwardly. Poverty and inequality in the United States exists for many reasons; reasons that very from the prospective lens. Interpretive theories in particular ask us to question our reality and its constructs. Interpretive theories require us to looks at the world as a social realm, one that we created and constantly change. Interpretive theories study the relationship between power and the construction of social roles as well as the invisible collection of patterns and habits that make up domination, (Delgado & Stefanic, 2001). Susan Kemp argues that the view of the world is dominated by the experiences of white western