bowlbys attachment theory

Perhaps the most influential explanation of attachment was presented by John Bowlby who began developing his ideas in the 1940s. Bowlby was commissioned by the World Health Organisation to investigate whether young children were likely to be harmed if they are separated from their mothers in the early years. (Hayes, 1996). Bowlby (1951) reported that infants possesses an innate need to attach to one main attachment figure (this was usually the mother). According to Hayes (1996), this is a special relationship which is qualitatively different from the relationship they form with any other kind of person. He described this as the process of monotropy; however, Bowlby did not deny that babies formed lots of attachments. (Bailey et al. 2008).

Bowlby’s attachment theory has greatly influenced practice. His theory of attachment explains the importance of having a figure that the child shares a strong bond with. Having an attachment can significantly support a child’s development as Barbara Woods suggests that “his theory of attachment proposed that attachment is innate in both infants and mothers, and that the formation of this attachment is crucial for the infants development” Wood, B (2001, p.53). Bowlby believed that forming an attachment will help a child develop in all areas e.g. emotionally, physical and mentally. However if they did not form an attachment in the sensitive period, the child may have issues or problems in their cognitive, emotional and social development.

Bowlby believed that babes had have built in social releasers that help form attachment, for example, crying and smiling. These would stimulate responses in caregivers. Bowlby also suggested that the infant would form only one primary attachment, and that this attachment would act as a secure base for exploring the world. This theory was also backed up by Mary Ainsworth ‘The Strange Situation’, Eysenck (2000). Another conclusion in Bowlbys attachment theory was that there was a sensitive period; a period were imprinting was important. This would affect attachment and have lifelong consequences. He

Very early will a child will attach to its caregiver, “because she fed the infant”(McLeod). At this stage the parent's behavior is becoming imprinted onto the child, and the child will continue to see their parent as their primary caregiver, and therefore, their role model as well. Bowlby’s theory of attachment relates strongly to the social learning theory. They both deal with people, whether it be infant or adult, learning and conforming to certain roles placed upon them. The infant will almost ‘study’ the parent, learning the rules the parent puts in place, and the adult will look to the majority as their parent, and conforms to their beliefs.

Bowlby’s attachment theory has significant and practical implications for education, human service workers, teachers and administrators while observing young children at risk of delinquency. This can be informing teachers and administrators the importance of attachment levels, as well as training them how to raise attachment levels. Teachers and administrators need to understand that attachment, crime, and developmental success are interconnected. The students must become attached before any other academic or disciplinary advances can be made (Boyle, 2014).

John Bowlby had worked with residential school children as a volunteer early on in his career and had determined that the children who suffered the most from anger outbursts, aggressivity, and whom her termed “affectionless” were also the children who had suffered the most maternal deprivation (). Bowlby advanced that the loss of the mother figure was extremely distressing and damaging and could influence adults' behavior years later. Hence, where psychoanalysis had been concerned “solely with the imaginings of the childish mind, the fantasied pleasures and the dreaded retributions” (Fonagy), Bowlby showed that humans do not develop in a void or as “individual monads” but as members of interacting systems. Bowlby developed his theory on attachment for several decades, and at a time where any dealings with childhood trauma were still rigorously influenced by Freudian psychoanalysis through the likes of psychoanalysts such Anna Freud or Melanie Klein. Even Winnicott was “revulsed” upon reading Bowlby's papers (siegel). It certainly was a bitter pill to swallow for psychoanalysts who had been repeating since Freud that the newborn was a little tyrant fighting for oral gratification at the mother's breast and merely clinging on to fulfil sexual instinctual needs. Bowlby's work was thus eschewed for a considerable time, despite his involvement with the World Health Organisation and the considerable empirical weight that was added to his findings by Mary Ainsworth's studies in

Preattachment takes place between birth and 6 weeks of the baby’s life. During this period a baby responds to the smell and voice of their mother. This is what comforts them. When the caregiver picks the baby up or smiles at the baby the first stages of attachment are formed. The complete stage of attachment has not yet been formed as you could leave the baby with an unfamiliar person and they would still be content.

Precious is a movie based on the novel Push by Sapphire (Daniels and Fletcher, 2008). It is on the life of an illiterate 16 year old African American girl, Claireece “Precious” Jones. (Natividad, 2010). I have applied John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory and Erik Erikson's Theory of Psychosocial Development on the film. These theories helped identify an understanding of the characters, family group, and community in the film. I have primarily assessed Precious as the chosen character. This paper will analyze the many factors in assessing her human behavior.

8. Bowlby developed the attachment theory. He defined his theory as a “lasting psychological connectedness between human beings.” Bowlby believed that suggests infants are “biologically predisposed to form attachments with primary caregivers in early life.” The infant's means of attachment aids the infant in feeling more safe, secure and “increases their likelihood of survival.” Caregivers are a secure base. Harlow proposed the idea of contact comfort. The idea of contact comfort was shown with the rhesus monkey experiment. The monkeys were given two surrogate mothers, one of cloth and one of wire. Because of the cloths comfort, monkeys were most likely to be attached to that “mother”, even if the other “mother” of only wire was providing food. Harlow also concluded that if a monkey was isolated from their mother for a prolonged period of time that the monkey would show autistic characteristics. Ainsworth’s also made discoveries of her own when

Bowlby undertook his study after being influenced by ethological studies, made suggestions that infants form attachment, due to genetic programming, to a single carer (usually the mother).

Steven Mitchell Attachment Theory and the Psychoanalytic Tradition: Reflections on Human Relationality is an interesting article in that it highlights the importance of personal relationships and human interaction and explores the difference between Bowlby’s attachment theory and psychoanalysis. Both psychoanalysis and attachment theory has respective approaches regarding how one comes to understand human nature and the individual. His use of clinical vignette helps to solidify the idea of the transactional understanding of the patient therapist relationship. Mitchell approach draws from other major psychoanalytic theorists such as Fairbairn, Loewald, Sullivan, Winicott, and Bowlb.

John Bowlby’s attachment theory established that an infant’s earliest relationship with their primary caregiver or mother shaped their later development and characterized their human life, “from the cradle to the grave” (Bowlby, 1979, p. 129). The attachment style that an infant develops with their parent later reflects on their self-esteem, well-being and the romantic relationships that they form. Bowlby’s attachment theory had extensive research done by Mary Ainsworth, who studied the mother-infant interactions specifically regarding the theme of an infant’s exploration of their surrounding and the separation from their mother in an experiment called the strange situation. Ainsworth defined the four attachment styles: secure,

Overall, there are three main features of Bowlby’s theory. These consist of infants and caregivers having an innate programming to become attached, a critical period, which is the time that in which the biological process of attachment takes place, and the continuity hypothesis, which basically states that attachment plays a role in later development. Bowlby says that attachment is inherited to improve survival and that infants are born “programmed” to become attached and parents are “programmed” also to attach. In order for this interaction to take place, social releasers have to be

Bowlby’s evolutionary theory of attachment hypothesizes that when children come into the world they are already biologically pre-programmed to form attachments with others, due to survival skills. He claimed that caregiver attachments has profound implications for child’s security and capacity to form trusting relationship. There are four phases; Preattachment phase (birth - 6 weeks) attachment in making (6 weeks - 6 to 8 months) clear cut attachment (6 to 8 months to 18months to 2 years) and formation of reciprocal relationship ( 18 months to 2 years on.) Ainsworth’s strange situation theory is theory of attachment. She observed the attachment relationships between a caregiver and a child. There are four types of attachment: secure, insecure-ambivalent,

Findings from animal studies were a powerful influence on Bowlby 's thoughts. He suggested too that there was a critical period for the development of attachments between infant and care giver. According to Bowlby, children display an innate tendency to become attached to one particular individual. He called this monotropy. He suggested this trend was qualitatively different from any subsequent attachment a child might form. However, he did not suggest monotropy was absolute but that the child has a hierarchy of attachments.