can long haul low cost airlines be successful

The main reason for the low-cost subsidiaries’ failure is the airlines’ corporate strategy. By launching a LCC as a unit inside the same corporate structure (e.g., single scheduling and pricing centre for United Airlines’ and Shuttle’s low–cost flights), traditional airlines limited the LCC’s flexibility and independence. By building a low-cost carrier on top of a traditional carrier cost-structure, the parent company was also tempted to think low-cost when setting ticket prices, but not trying (or being able) to reduce traditionally high costs: the airline had now two unsustainable business models instead of one!

While Frontier and Delta are both popular choices of airlines for Americans, Delta has become more of a household name because of their friendlier service, more comfortable cabins, and their limited extras fees. Frontier airline still is a worthy competitor by being cheaper, but they also have many added on fees for things that are free with Delta. Overall, Delta knows how to take better care of their customers and make sure everyone is satisfied.

pilots, and new next generation aircraft acquisitions to carry the airline proudly into the next 75

American Airlines is one of the major American airlines who serves nearly 50 countries globally and also a member of the one world global alliance. The airline corporate headquarters are in Fort Worth, Texas. Over the years the airline expanded through the union or merger of 85 companies. Robertson Aircraft Corporation and Colonial Air Transport were the core of the foundation of this company. In 1921, Robert Aircraft organized first in Missouri as a general manufacturer and flying service who flew its first mail route on April 15, 1926 between Chicago and St. Louis, Missouri. The first flight flown by pilot Charles A. Lindbergh. A charter, Colonial Air called Bee Line formed in 1923, flew mail between New York City and Boston which began on

• Propensity of buyer to switch to other alternatives is low because cost like - pilot training cost + mechanics + engineers +maintenance cost are also high.

Another emerging trend in the past five years has involved the progress made on open skies agreements between the United States and other countries. Open skies agreements serve to liberalize Orlando International Airport transport markets between the two signing countries or parties in the agreement. These agreements remove government restrictions, such as limits to the number of flights any one airline is allowed to operate per week between countries. The removal of these limitations has opened some routes up to increased competition, by allowing Orlando International Airport to fly more frequently and making these routes more accessible. Orlando International Airport could not previously justify the capital expense of operating on routes with limited flights are now able to profit on routes with high demand.

Reduced the comparison sample size had to include only low-cost airlines with positive earnings. The average P/E ratio is skewed towards Frontier’s outlying performance. By using the median P/E ratio of comparable companies seem to provide a more accurate estimate. With predicted earnings per share in 2002 of $1.20, JetBlue’s price per share would be $34.2.

Operations in international and/or foreign countries will create significant operational challenges. Differences in governing laws and regulations for the airlines industry, business, and employee relations will become challenging. Interpretation and intent for various laws can and will provide ambiguity that must be dealt with. Research shows that various international airlines continue to be plagued by high costs and poor service (Ramamurti & Sarathy, 2007).

Low-cost carriers mainly operate high-volume passenger traffic on short-distance routes, use second-level airports, and offer no extra services. Given

• to liberalize the rules for international aviation markets and minimizes government intervention — the provisions apply to passenger, all-cargo and combination air transportation and encompass both scheduled and charter services; or

Triant Flouris, Thomas John Walker. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. Halifax: Mar 2005. Vol. 22, Iss. 1; pg. 3, 18 pgs

Abstract The aim of this paper is to identify challenge faced to Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) or Low-Cost Airlines and provide new insights into the development and competitive strategy for LCCs. LCCs are still a relatively new phenomenon in Australia since Virgin Blue and Jetstar came to the market. There are over 30 LCCs have been launched since 2002 worldwide. In fact, LCCs have been very successful in the USA and Europe since 1990s. For example, in 1994 less than 3 million passengers flew on LCCs. In 1999, five years later, this figure had risen to about 17.5

Flouris & Walker (2005), a pilot of an average low-cost carrier flies approximately 25.1% more

Nok Air is a low cost airline. It is a joint-venture between Thai Airway International Public Company and private company. The airline has combined between the service

A low cost airline generally has many features that differentiate it from the traditional carriers. These features include ticketless travel, online ticket sales, no international offices, no frequent flyer points, no free food and beverages, no inflight magazines, no club lounges, use of secondary city airports.