case analysis

Sam was interviewed as he was a suspect of Cathy’s death but in the interview, he denied being guilty of Cathy’s death. In the interview Sam said he could not have killed Cathy as he did not have any contact with her the day of the murder and he claimed he would never kill someone he loved. In the first court trial, no one was charged with Cathy’s murder, as Sam could not be proven guilty of the crime. No one believed that Sam was capable of killing Cathy as he said he loved her and he had not contacted Cathy the day of the murder. It was not until 20 years later that evidence proved Sam was guilty of Cathy’s death. At the beginning people questioned how Sam was capable of killing Cathy, but he was very capable of doing it as he stabbed her seventy times (Emery). Despite the fact many murders are committed by people who are close to the victim, most people find it hard to believe someone would be capable of committing

P1) If the victims were allowed to carry guns (P), then the situation would have been much different (Q).

(1) Whether a plaintiff must plead and prove willful and wanton conduct in order to

Would any of the following actions cause a statement of a suspect to be involuntary?

“And George raised the gun and steadied it, and he brought the muzzle of it close to the back of Lennie's head. The hand shook violently, but his face set and his hand steadied. He pulled the trigger. The

Here, the facts explicitly indicate that "all the necessary forms ... had been signed by the students." TEACHER wil argue that PLAINTIFF agreed to, and participated in, those actions which PLAINTIFF claims to have caused injury or damage, since such participation and consent were given knowingly and voluntarily. Hence, the plaintiff’s claims are invalid.

Emerson's possession of a firearm was construed as a perceivable threat to his family and, therefore, a direct violation of the restraining order. Mr. Emerson argued that the Act is "an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause and the Second, Fifth, and Tenth Amendments to the United States Constitution" (United 2). The District Court addressed each claim separately, finding credibility in only Emerson's Second and Fifth Amendment claims.

The trial court, under rule 409, should not admit Pete’s testimony stating that Donna, during her visit to the hospital, offered to pay his medical

The party crashers started quarrel with the guests and the defendant chased everyone out where the crashers open fired on the guests and left. The plaintiffs (three guests) had sustained injuries and wanted compensation for it. Two were injured from gunshots and one was not able to get the affection and love that her husband gave her in the same way.

Outside their apartment, Stephen and Stanley resumed their altercation, at which point, Mark said, the younger brother pulled out a gun and fired a shot, fatally striking his older sibling. "I ran outside, I got to the point of where [my brothers were fighting]," said Mark. "Right before my eyes, my brother shot my other brother."

In the above scenario, the outcome should be that the suspects statement, “I killed her and threw the baseball bat over the fence”, would be allowed in court and used against Tom to convict him of the aggravated assault. Also, the baseball bat the officer collected will be admitted at trial as evidence to be used against Tom. The motion to suppress the statement Tom provided about his motive would be omitted from court, and could not be used against him for a conviction of the assault.

In this case, the accident is the proximate cause of Mrs. Smith’s injuries and the medical providers are the intervening cause, as their breach of duty exacerbated Mrs. Smith’s injury to the point of permanent disability and disfigurement.

A few days later, James’ parole agent called Margaret to tell her, James admitted entering their home without permission while carrying a weapon. He said they send him back to state prison on a parole violation. At first, when she told Andrew, he was happy, until he remembered the threats. Now he was concerned James’s friends would hurt him or Margaret. Even though, the officer said, in cases like this,

Louis felt the pistol rub against his side. He had clipped the pistol on his right side just like Harry showed him. He was ready if he needs to fire, but he really hoped he wouldn’t. He wasn’t concerned about the killing factor, he would kill Sterling in a heartbeat. The thing that concerned him was his poor aim. He could shoot, but his aim was quite shaky.

What legal claim and defenses should be asserted in the suit by Tommy against Michael? Against Doctor? Discuss.