University of La Verne
Graduate School of Business & Public Administration
BUS 551
Seminar in Organization Theory & Behavior
Spring Term 2014
Instructor: Loren R. Dyck
Student Name:
Student ID:
Due date: 05/19/2014
As the rapid development of modern economy and the increasingly fierce market competition, the demand of how to manage organization change is increasing. Especially for leaders in both large and small companies, the ability of dealing with change is so significant. In many case, the main reason for company bankruptcy is that leaders fail to cope with organization environment change properly. The demise of many fortune 500 companies in the 1980s and
…show more content…
I also conducted pilot project the following week, I want to see the marketing condition of the new sunglass product, to find its drawbacks and relative developing ways.
Week 74 – Week 75
In the seventy four week, I privately confront resister Louise Orysh to ask his opinion about new products and why she doesn’t adopt it, to know the weakness of the new product and how to reform. Then I restructured organization the following week.
Week 91 – Week 93
During the ninety one to ninety three weeks, I provided internal skill-building and external building again, and then, my initiative achieved all the managers’ adoption.
CHANGING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT
Now I will assess my work. As a change agent, I have 20 adopters of sustainability initiative in the management team at Spectrum, I persuaded all the managers adopt my proposal successfully. I have succeed in bringing about a significant organization change and creating a bright future for both Spectrum and the environment. So, I think I am an effective change agent.
But I also have some deficiencies on my changing management practices. Although I attained 20 adaptors, I spend 93 weeks to get this result, it’s really a long time. The change efficiency ratio is only 0.22. I have to say my work is effective but not efficient, I still need to shorten working time to improve change efficiency. The
Businesses are facing a dichotomy between wanting to chalk out an all-time structure and strategy for their organization, and recognizing that their world is in a constant state of flux [3]. For most of the 20th century they were largely focused on the static elements of this dichotomy. However, in the last decade changes have become more frequent and more dramatic, so much so that a whole branch of management is now devoted to the subject of change itself.
This paper looks into Synergic solutions Inc., a company that resells assembled computers. The Organizational simulation will look into the three theories of change management. Using the three theories, the paper will analyse any cross-cultural issues that come with change. The paper will look at three internal and external drivers that have propelled change in the organization. It will also look into any factors that the head will need to look at in order to ensure change in the organization. Resistance is one of the aftermaths of implementing change. The paper will look at what types of resistance that the head of the company might face and the way this resistance may be handled. This will in turn look into the leadership styles that may
As CEO and founder of Spectrum Sunglass Company, I want to bring a change in the company that can make the company and its products more environmentally sustainable. To do that, I need to convince 20 managers at Spectrum to adopt my initiative in 96 weeks. And I used 85 weeks to reach that goal. Here’s what I did.
Not only were the leaders impressed by the employees insights, they took action to address all of the problems. As a result, participation increased, communication improved, relationship between employees and management improved, and access to training and development opportunities were wide-spread. But most importantly, once the original change initiatives were introduced, employees embraced the initiatives, offered insights on how to improve their outcomes, and ensured their success.
Businesses have to adapt to the ever-changing economy. It is not much of a choice for business leaders to change elements of their organization to stay in competition with their peers. The hardest part, most of the time, is changing the people in the organization to develop the necessary outcome or goal. As a business leader getting rid of people or changing their job specifics is one of the many responsibilities they have to be comfortable performing. Organizations have to take into consideration their competitors, customers, shareholders, employees, and the community to make decisions. Change is an aspect that many people are afraid of. In the new millennium, organizational leaders have to embrace
By understanding the importance of effective change management we can facilitate our commitment to the development of a successful change management program. By gaining insight into the different factors that can contribute to successful change management, we can guide the design of an appropriate change management program. In the following pages, it
There was a dilemma regarding sustainable economic development in my company, Spectrum Sunglass Company. Due to the request of “green” from Bigmart, which was the largest retail customer, my company should have decided whether its strategy plan needed to be adjusted. I was the Director of Product Innovation within the R&D unit, in addition to being a resolute advocate for reducing the company’s dependence on petrochemical raw materials. However, much resistance took place. I had 96 weeks to persuade my superiors and colleagues.
With the high interest of adopting a more eco-friendly environment, Spectrum Sunglass Company was challenged to provide a greener product to the largest retail customer Big Mart in a short timeframe. Big Mart suggested that Spectrum to reduce the use of petrochemical raw materials in the manufacturing of the products from 90% to 50% within two years. In the interim, Big Mart requested a detailed implementation plan of action within three months. If action plan is not received, Big Mart will cancel business with Spectrum and will work with competitors willing to incorporate greener products. As the Director of Product Innovation, I was eager to implement the change for numerous reasons. Prior to being presented with this challenge, many customers voiced concerns over the company’s environmental impact. Looking for ways to develop the company economically while setting Spectrum apart from competitors both price and design wise. Although the deadline for the action plan was short, the thought of the company growing by developing a distinctive product was positive. However, being a middle manager, I do not have the authority to put the change in place. Collages and senior management support is highly needed.
The “Change Management Simulation: Power and Influence” worked through a 96-week initiative to get Spectrum Sunglasses to adopt a new sustainable output. The goal was to convince the team that a dramatic change in the organization’s strategy and products were necessary, and that environmental sustainability was critical to the company’s future. The move for Spectrum Sunglass Company to move to greener techniques was largely radical because it impacts so many different parts of the organization- Manufacturing procedure, culture and ethos, target marketing- to name a few. Through the weeks of attempting to get the entire organization to adopt the new initiative I was faced with a variety of choices to use. While there was no specific order in which to use them, the ability to use the right decisions at the correct time was pivotal to gaining support and building the organization through a new and challenging enterprise.
New Behavior, “More people feel able to act, and do act, on the vision.” (Kotter, The Eight Steps for Successful Large-Scale Change) This new behavior discussed in the chapter was very informative about how employees are empower action. A comparative with The Heart of Change book that Ivancevich, Konopaske, Matteson gave in the textbook on motivation was job satisfaction with the feeling of achievement. The
The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace.
After reviewing and researching the literature with respect to organizational changes, I have come to the conclusion that organizations have always changed. When everything in the world is changing, organization cannot remain islands. They must change to face new challenges. Bolman and Deal (2008) claim organizations have changed about as much as in past few decades as in the preceding century. Bolman and Deal (2008) claim means that the change organizations have experienced in the last decade are almost similar to those they experience in at the end of the twentieth century.
In today's business world, corporations have become more complex and more unpredictable, in fact it is considered almost "healthy" that a corporation experience change and transformation. Companies need to be susceptible and ready to acknowledge the challenges that change presents with and try to overcome these for the benefit of the company as a whole. Due to the ever-changing business and social environments caused strongly by globalizations, this has meant that companies must keep themselves up-to-date, whether it is through using the latest form of technology or through the latest management fad. There are many factors involved with change and the successful management of it which can often be a difficult time for
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
In this dynamic business environment, change is inevitable. Changes can be planned, or unintentional: depending on the driving forces behind. The major forces for change can be derived from the nature of the workforce, technology, economic shocks, competition, social trends, and world politics (Robbins & Judge, 2011). In this post the author will explain the Kotter’s eight –step approaches to managing organizational change and discuss how his company handles the planned changes in term of organization reconstruction.