how do people apologize in english and catalan cultures Essay

The Last Judgement is the final part of the York Corpus Christi Play. This play deals with Christ’s return from heaven to judge people. Its characters are God, Jesus, three angels, three devils, two apostles, two good souls and two bad souls. The section of the play, on which this essay will focus, is a speech of Jesus addressing the audience as well as the good and the bad souls. While he threatens the bad souls with punishment, he promises the good souls rewards. The scene is set rather at the end of the play. The part before is used to direct the audience’s attention to this scene, while the part afterwards can be understood as a reinforcement of Jesus’ speech. Undoubtedly, this scene is the most central one in the play. As it will be shown by analyzing the way of staging as well as the speech’s structure and language, its purpose is to frighten the audience and to help them leading a faithful life.

Politeness is able to show a person’s feelings towards others and awareness of a social custom. There are many purposes of politeness including: creating a public self image, creating solidarity, threatening people to send a negative message, not threatening people or upsetting them, indicating social relationship, showing awareness of social context, and power dynamics. The value of polite speech in a culture has the purpose of creating solidarity. Polite speech in a specific culture is very important and should be practiced as much as possible.

Through using powerful words in, “Othello”, the human behaviour of the characters is either positively or negatively influenced, and their characteristics and destinies are created. In the following essay “the power of words” in “Othello” will be discussed. Firstly, an introduction paragraph will be given about the power of language devices. Secondly, the language device, “words as power”, will be discussed. Thirdly, the language device, “words as character”, will be elaborated upon. Lastly, the

Saying ¨I am sorry¨ is not all, the key element is to forgive. The seven-lettered word might be hard for some to pronounce,yet it is the most essential weapon to fight pride. While it causes the liberation of feelings inside a person, it ,likewise, is the resolving of a sociocultural problem, pride and honor, among various types of people.

Conversation is a ritual every person must encounter throughout their lives in order to function properly with one another in today’s society. However, every individual has a “different idea about what’s appropriate” when approaching someone in any sort of conversation; that is why we are referred to as individuals (Tannen 327). There are thousands of diverse languages to speak to one another with, in fact that means there are thousands of different ways to offend each other with our words. Within those languages there are several contrasting gestures that can offend any single person, such as the amount of times individuals apologize in one meeting, giving criticism too harshly, or thanking someone so often it does not seem genuine. In the article “What Do You Mean,” Deborah Tannen touches upon apologies, criticism, and thank yous in further detail to explain where individuals go wrong within conversation and how they can fix their actions. Individuals find it satisfying to please others by being polite because it is the ‘right’ thing to do, however like myself others need to stand up for themselves and get directly to the point now in order to avoid conflict later in life.

Hiero or Tyrannicus is a dialogue that was taking about a real-life of tyrant of the Greek city of Sicily. Tyrant is the absolute ruler or the dictator who has sized power without legal right. It is a conservation between Hiero, tyrant of the city-state of Syracuse and a famous poet whose name was Simonides. This dialogue between Hiero and Tyranny was concerning about the happiness’s of the tyrants during their power. The analyzes and the present study shows that the understanding of Hiero is better and easy throw the thought of the author, and it helps to write about it deeply. This dialogue does not talk about philosophy, literature, or historical events, it just rely on the power that leadership had for ruling their

In “The Apology,” Socrates represents himself in his own trial. He boldly questions the morality of the people of court. In this report, I will be analyzing portions of “The Apology” in order to reveal the intellectuality of this text within this time frame. I will only discuss bits of “The Apology“ on account that it is a lengthy piece. However, before discussing the speech it is important to set the scene. Socrates was born in 469 B.C.E. and lived to 399 B.C.E. (Nails, 2014).

“The Apology” epitomizes Socrates acuities in a trial in 399 BC. Plato incorporates the word “apologia” to illustrate the view, life, and events of the character Socrates. The publication provides a chronological explanation of the life of Socrates in the following ways. First, Socrates acknowledges that he almost became unaware of his character while addressing the Athen’s Populace. The prologue, therefore, creates the direction and the tone of the ensuing dialogue. Thus, the introductory section enables the audience to develop a sense of understanding the character, motives and the perceptions regarding the false accusations of representing a sophist and physicalist ideas. Therefore, Socrates speaks the plain language to counter the false

Plato’s Apology is a narrative of the famous speech of Socrates that is made during his trial. Instead of apologizing, Socrates attempts to defend himself and his actions. He is put on trial due to his accusations of corrupting Athens, not acknowledging the same gods as the state, and creating new gods. During his dialogue, Socrates remains very calm and speaks with honesty. He focuses on what is said rather than his manner of speech.

The Apology is meant to defend Socrates as he stands accused by Athens. Considering how Socrates presents his defense, it is evident that he only uses the title of apology as justification but not as a regret statement or expression of sorrow. The apology was made after Socrates was accused with ungodliness as well as corrupting the youth in Athens by alienating powerful people in the practice of Socratic dialogue. The Socratic dialogue is a process attempting to clarify concepts such as justice and friendship by using definition from a person who argues that he understands the concepts and systematically showing how such a definition as well as definitions by other philosophers leads to contradiction.

Plato’s Apology gives people insight into what occurred when Plato’s role model, Socrates, was put on trial and seemed to use the opportunity as another chance to speak into others’ lives. Socrates had been broadcasting his ideas to those around him, which was what caused him to be put on trial. Many had anger towards Socrates since he was going against the society’s pre-set beliefs and claimed that he had been corrupting the youth with his outrageous ideals. But one thing that Socrates said specifically was something of great offense to those he was speaking to, and yet of such immense importance as well.

Socrates died after his attempt to persuade the Athenians by telling the truth during a time when truthfulness was of little concern. I found unit 3 to be extremely interesting because I never knew about the trial or death of Socrates. Socrates is known as the father of Greek Philosophy and was put on trial by citizens of Athens in 399 399 B.C.E. for allegedly corrupting the youth and Impiety. Unit 3 allowed me to examine the trial and learn about the attitudes of people in Athens during this era. The title of the dialogue I learned about was, The Apology. The Apology was dialogue written by Plato, one of Socrates student’s and admirers, in an attempt to defend Socrates’ reputation after his death. It is a description of the speech that Socrates gave when he was on trial for the alleged crimes. Learning about the trial of Socrates was interesting to me because it caused me to examine the way criminal indictments has changed over the years.

The Apology of Socrates is a Plato’s version of speeches given by Socrates who was accused for two main reasons: the corruption of the youth and impiety (not believing in gods in whom the city believes). In the Apology Socrates tries to defend himself and his actions but not to apologize for it. He insisted that he must be wiser than others because he knows and recognizes that knows nothing. The Apology by Plato shows that there is a great influence of Socrates in searching for the truth about humanity and society even when his attempt contradicted with the opinions of the “many”.

The Apology of Socrates,by Plato,is an important work of literature. Although written some two-thousand years ago,it shows us how our society is much like the one of Socrates.It shows how the equities and inequities of his time are like the one's today.In reading the Apology of Socrates,one can learn how consistency can lead to equitableness.

In addition to differences in pronunciation, vocabulary and grammatical structures among cultural groups, variations also exist in the rules for general discourse in oral communication, covering such specific acts as narratives and conversation. In communicating with one another, teachers and students naturally will follow the assumptions and rules governing discourse within their respective cultures. Discourse rules govern such aspects of communication as: opening or closing conversations; taking turns during conversations; interrupting; using silence as a communicative device; interjecting humor at appropriate times and using nonverbal behavior. Once again, an American student studying in the middle east, who would constantly interrupt the teacher in order to clarify the professor’s opinion, would be considered to be