jocks vs pukes questions and answers Essay

In the essay “Jock Culture” by Robert Lipsyte, the author explains the lifestyle of jocks and how there are two different types of people in the world. Lipsyte has very good points in his essay that the author mainly agrees with the essay but the author also believe there are few points that the author also disagrees with. The author believes that there is jock culture in today’s world. Although it seems like people are beginning to change. Jocks are not beginning to act like jocks anymore and people are evolving.

In 1975, Robert Lipsyte wrote “Jock Culture” which was in “The Sportsmaster.” It didn’t appear in “The Nation” until 2011. Analysis will examine the credibility of the examples used by the author to stage his claims.

Billions and billions of dollars going... where? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes almost 11 billion dollars a year from college athletics but where does that money go? Well, the money for sure does not end up in the hands of these collegiate student-athletes, those men, and women who make them all that money in the first place. These billionaires want all the money for themselves. They are selfish. They are self-centered. They are money-hungry. They are part of the problem with college athletics. They are scared to lose just a small portion of this exorbitant pile of riches that they make to pay these hard working, devoted athletes. How could this problem be solved? You should be 100 percent sure of what you would do in this situation. They are putting themselves on the line just to make the NCAA money and not get any in return. Just take a minute and process what these athletes are doing and how they are not getting repaid by these networks mostly NCAA.

The millions of dollars brought into the schools by the athletes, is given to everyone else besides the athletes. The coaches, the president of the school, and the faculty are the ones who get all of it. “It is a modern form of

The colleges could use that money to help improve their campuses. Colleges would be able to renovate and upgrade their gyms, classrooms, or dorms. By doing this, more people and students would be attracted to that school and want to go there. If they paid the athletes, then they would not have the opportunity to upgrade their standards. Also, the colleges could use that money towards the scholarships. Many students are unable to afford all of the money and tuition that comes with schooling, so when they offer scholarships, they bring in more students. More students equal higher popularity, and more popularity equals more success for the school. Another reason why college should get the money over athletes is that it could go towards the athletic directors and the staff of the athletic programs. That pay will ensure that the directors are doing their best and making the right decisions to help their teams progress positively. By bringing in the most talented players, the team has a better chance of winning games. Overall, the money would help the colleges gain an advantage over others and give them more opportunities than if they paid the

Many college athletes have trouble with their money throughout their college lives. One of the main reasons that colleges don’t want to pay their athletes is because they think that they won’t use the money efficiently. “The debate over paying college athletes ignores the fact that they are already paid. The real question is, should they be paid more?” (Sack).

Spreading the money to the athletes that bring such large amounts of revenue to the schools would be a good benefit for each individuals work. These benefits would especially help the larger money producing sports, because generally these take up more of a student’s time. Sports such as, football, baseball, and basketball, taking into consideration that those are the sports that make the most profit and consume the most time. “I’m interested in seeing the people who produce the revenue share a teeny, tiny slice of it. That’s right, football and men’s basketball players get paid; lacrosse, field hockey, softball, soccer player get nothing” (Wilbon). When the topic arises, this is the basic way for people to describe their point of view. There are more than just those two sports than deserve to be paid. There are a variety of

A decades-old argument has been: With all of this revenue, why shouldn’t the student-athletes on teams such as these be paid for the hard work and effort they put into playing their sport? Those opposed to this argument ask: Why should

A lot of that money will be shared with the colleges. But the players will not receive any of it.” (Vardaan) So, these basketball players are taking nearly a month off of time off of their studies and personal/family life to bring in “roughly $900 million in revenue” (Berr). Still, these athletes will not see any of that money.

What does this passage mean to you? (You do not need to use textual evidence in this response. Make sure to RESTATE the question and respond to it completely). Answer :

Secondly, According to Kenny Zuckerman and WalletHub “I'm not quite sure how I would distribute the dollars, but it would be some sort of formula based on getting a degree, the school profiting on that players' likeness and the merchandise deal the school has during that players four years of on the field playtime” (Zuckerman). With all of the ticket sales, merchandise sold, and the attention the athletes are bringing to the school, schools are making tons of money, but they can’t manage to pay their athletes just a small percentage of their profits. With this being said, college athletes need to be

Next, players that work very hard at the game they love, and play every game. They deserve that kind of money, but giving over 7 million dollars to players that don’t touch the field all year. That's just wrong and disrespectful, to the kids that don’t have a mom or dad, and that has lived outside every single day of their life. That’s just the saddest and horrible thing that I have experience in my life.

The schools may get over $100k but they go into new uniforms clubs other sports and go into the school's athletic equipment. If the athlete is good enough then they will be taken into a professional league and play as a pro but in school they may have gotten a scholarship to get free schooling so they have already have a

Sporting events is a place for people to go, relax, have fun, and do something they enjoy doing, watching sports. However, the average family finds it difficult to buy tickets to them and still there are 66,960 fans that attend an NFL game. (Wikipedia) The public contributes to the athletes’ salary and then complains about how

There has been amplified debate on the treatment, education, training of the college athlete. To avoid exploitation of athletes, “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), formed in 1905, set bylaws requiring college student-athletes to be amateurs in order to be eligible for intercollegiate athletics competition” (Schneider n.p.). Intercollegiate athletics have dramatically changed over the last several decades. Currently, intercollegiate athletics generate tremendous amounts of revenue, remarkably in football and basketball. College sports in America is a