nm,n. On the other hand the main dissimilarity of those two essays is authors view towards the society. Their ideas are very helpful for the development of our society.

The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.

An argument is a claim supported by reasons and pieces of evidence. Arguments have five primary attributes. Firstly, argumentation is a social process which involves two or more parties responding to one another’s proposal or claim. For the case of a written argument, the writer responds to the content of the essay through a critique process. The responses should not only involve restating the same claims and reasons but rather providing supportive pieces of evidence to the positions taken accordingly. Secondly, the aim of an argument is to make the audience adhere to the written critique. The objective is to influence the audience with the aim of gaining support to

Argumentation is a significant element, and people tend to use it every day. By using the word “argumentation” I do not mean to go against someone’s opinion and arguing with them, but what I mean is making others have faith or some sort of belief on the person who is arguing. However, these arguments can occur in two ways such as direct argument and indirect argument. Furthermore, these arguments work with elements and there are three types of elements ethos, pathos, and logos. These elements are engaged with practical reasoning which are divided into three parts datum, warrant, and claim. Accordingly, to discuss about the process of the argumentation “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” will be a notable example.

speaker, audience. In their writing (chapter 1) argue that everything can be turned into an argument. They support their claim by first telling about Michelle Obama's tweets about her concern of a kidnapping, by terrorist group Boko Haram, of more than 200 Nigerian girls in 2014. Then by explaining how we make arguments. The author’s purpose is to inform readers about make arguments by using ethos, pathos, and logos.

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

Argument/Finding (What position did the author take? What were their main points? What are their claims/conclusions?) (75)

The purpose of this assignment is to make us capable to argue our claims with evidences. Moreover, it also learnt to be aware of the other side of the argument by writing the counter argument.

7. Address a reader who has read the chosen argument but who has not analyzed it thoroughly.

In this rhetorical rationale on English 1010, my purpose is to professionally present a rhetorical analysis of this review. Since day one of my English 1010 class, I have learned a lot about rhetoric, it has been long time since I was in school, I didn’t know what ethos, logos or pathos meant. And that when you read an essay, an article, a book, newspaper, etc, they all have a purpose and an audience. For me it is really hard to understand when I read and write something because the minute I finish reading it, I forget what was all about. With all I have learned in this class now I can concentrate and focus more, I’m able to identify the parts of a rhetorical triangle, I know how to write a summary and rhetorical analysis.

Hannah Dodson Period 6- English Summer Read 4 August 2015 Thank You for Arguing- Cornell Notes Questions/Main Ideas: | Chapter 1: Open Your Eyes | -Everything can be an Argument Rhetoric: the act of | - “I wrote this book for a reason: to lead you through this ill-known persuasion | world of argument and welcome you to the Persuasive Effect.” | -Persuasion Alert Offense: |Chapter 2: Set Your Goals | -Have a set reason to argue | -Know what you’re arguing for | -Know what you want to get out of it | -Set personal goal | -Set goals for audience | | Chapter 4: Soften Them Up | -Ethos: argument by character | -Pathos: argument by emotion Concession: the act of using | -Logos:

Read the following short essay, and then write a 3-5 page response (12-point font, double-spaced, normal margins, no cover page, no binders). Your response should do the following three things: (1) state what the main conclusion of the essay is; (2) state what the most important premises (including sub-conclusions) are—i.e., state which premises are most important if the argument is to rationally convince its audience; (3) evaluate the quality of the argument, giving detailed reasons to justify your evaluation. For purposes of evaluation, assume that the speaker is a contemporary Canadian philosopher and the audience is a group of students in Introduction to Philosophy.

a. Examine the techniques (tone, style of the introduction and conclusion, use of persuasive appeals and general language) that aided the author to prove his point.

The argument that I will be analysing for the second assignment is “ illegal pot shops should close down”. The argument is about how dangerous it is for the pot shops to operate without the official legislation. After analysing the argument I strongly agree that the argument is valid and sound because its very detailed and the premises are supporting the conclusion. In this essay I will be writing about how the argument is a strong argument with many valid premises which support the conclusion.

The selection above is provided to make student aware of focus of the essay.  The complete essay begins below.

In this written report, I will be including both sides of the argument which enable me to form my opinion as well as conclusion.