sat 2 Essay

My leadership style is about how I treat under me with respect, approachable and willing to listen with different suggestions in decision making. I want to have a cooperative teamwork, little supervision, and motivation with professionalism. There is always room for training in developing skills and expertise and encouragement to go above and beyond.

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

Before this lecture and assignment I never gave it thought about different leadership styles and what type I have or will deal with in the past, present, and future. This paper also gave me chance to break down how I’m a different leader depending on what situation I’m put in. As of right now it would be difficult trying to put my leadership style because I’m always in different positon that allow be that to specific leader. Right now I’m in a great position that allow me to lead other in the direction that benefit them and the

During my examination of the various types of leadership styles, I was able to take a few assessments online. There were two that stood out the most for me which, were The Type A and B personality indicator and the Hemisphere Dominance Personality Assessment. I found that the style that these two assessments closely matched my own style.

In the book there are assessment tools that will help you in analyzing your own leadership style. Thee is also a practical chart showing the four learning stages (novice, apprentice, journeyman, and master/teacher) and obstacles to success in each. There's specific help; rather than just telling readers to get into an accountability group, the authors offer a specific model of what this would

This assessment is a questionnaire about different styles of Path-Goal leadership.The assessment score based off what I receive on the questionnaire provide information about which style of leadership I would use most often while having a leadership role. For Directive style, the score I received 26. This is a common score for Directive style. For Supportive style, the score I received was 33. This is a high score for the Supportive style. For Participative style, the score I received was a 26. This is considered a high score for the participative style. Finally for Achievement-Orientated style the score I received was was 27. This score is extremely high for Achievement-Orientated style. This assessment showed that I am more likely to demonstrate a Participative, Supportive and Achievement- Orientated style when in a leadership

Throughout my life there have been many people and instances shaping me into the person/leader I am today. I used to watch leaders to see how they observed situations, storing those moments into my memory bank as knowledge for later use. While I thought this was a good way to becoming a better leader, I found myself trying to employ processes based on past results. This methodology had very little success; if one idea didn’t work I would just try something

leadership style it is easier to define it by establishing your individual leadership traits. There are

There is much to consider when evaluating leadership styles. Much of it is an introspective quest of where do I fit or belong. I do not want to force myself into a category, and what if I do not fit a category? These were thoughts as I considered where I should place myself assigning a label to my leadership style. A couple resonated well with me like transitional and transformative leadership as they are flexible and make room to impact others; however, I did not feel as though I fit the mold well. I most comfortably fit in the Authentic Leadership Model.

Both leaders are participatory because they allow employees to participate by giving input into the decision making process. Participative leadership management values the input of the team members and employees, but also the responsibility of making the final decisions with participative leader. Both leaders had the inherent traits to be great leaders. The trait leadership theory believes that people are either born or are made with certain qualities that will make them excel in leadership roles. That is, certain qualities such as intelligence, sense of responsibility, creativity and other values puts anyone in the shoes of a good

There are many leadership styles and is important to know which style you are. There are many ways one can learn their leadership style, for example, through assessments. Knowing your leadership style will help you become a better leader. Although there are many leadership assessments our text discussed four assessments that can give insights into building blocks of personality most commonly identified by peers, subordinate employees, and supervisors (Ledlow, et al, 2014). These assessments include: Hemisphere Dominance assessments; Jungian assessments; Vark test; Struder Group; Price Group; and many

In any organization, the role of leadership effectiveness depends on either if he/she has total controls of the decision making process and supervises work done in the group called autocratic leadership style (Greenberg, p.456), if the leader has minimum supervision and allows group participation in decision making known as delegation leadership style (Greenberg, p.456) and lastly a leader who prefers half of each styles called participative leadership style. (Greenberg, p.456)

The questionnaire which best describes what I believe to be my managerial or leadership style would have to be the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The reason why I believe that this questionnaire best describes my managerial or leadership style is because the scoring interpretation describes seven factors of managerial or leadership style and indicates which factors are higher than others, also giving a brief description of the style. My results showed that my individualized consideration was high. Revealing the extent to which I show interest regarding others prosperity, delegate tasks to suitable candidates and to make sure everyone feels involved. Also, my result for laissez-faire was high, meaning I would let things take their own course of action without interfering. My other results from the questionnaire showed that my idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, contingent reward and management by-exception were moderate.

In the past several years, researchers have done a thorough research work in how they define leadership and leadership behavior. Leadership students and researchers have described many different types of leadership styles. The democratic and autocratic leadership styles are just two of the most prominent leadership styles that have been identified in leadership literatures.

This study has demonstrated that there are a few paramount components which straightforwardly impacted a leadership style. A pioneer can 't be reliable on one leadership styles to be viable pioneer in the current aggressive nature. I have highlighted how fruitful pioneers who figured out how to turnaround weak organizations with their leadership style were later rejected amid great time because of their failure to adjust their initiative style to suit the current circumstance. Henceforth I presume that there is nobody style of authority fit for all sort of circumstances.