small families

Is there a reason traditional families have lasted for thousands of years? In the argumentative essay “In Defense of Single Of Motherhood” by Katie Roiphe, the author is arguing that a single mother is a significant way to raise children. Roiphe also includes how being a traditional mother and father family is unsuccessful and frustrating. Although being a single mother may work for her, countless numbers of single mothers struggle in many different ways. These struggles affect the mother and the children as well. Being a single mother is harmful for a family because a child needs a father figure, it is too much stress on one person, and it is financially difficult to raise a family on one income.

This article “One and Done” is an excerpt from her book “One and Only” and the reviews of this book come from extremely credible sources such as the New York Times, therefore establishing her credibility. The author’s purpose for writing this piece is to argue that having one child is not “detrimental” to the child psychologically, and only-children are not different than kids with siblings. This piece was written July 7, 2010 so the research and studies are very up to date. The main points of this article started out with the argument of why Sandler herself decided to have one child, and this is based on how “the economy is sluggish… and raising kids cost a bundle. She describes the effects of the recession on the number of children women bear, and points out that women are having less and less children because of their high costs. Sandler then goes on to discuss why people urge families to have more than one child, and she uses personal experience of a cashier in a store to exemplify the pressure of having more kids. Sandler investigates why there is such an aversion to have only one child, “single children are perceived as spoiled, selfish, solitary misfits,” because this is such a believable stereotype, parents are pressured to have multiple children because they “don’t want to do that to their child.” Sandler uses the study by Granville Stanley Hall to act as a counterargument

Given these points, being a single mother is not as effective as being a family with a mother and father. Being a single mother is harmful for a family because a child needs a father figure, it is too much stress on one person, and it is financially difficult to raise a family on one income. A parent’s most important job is for their children to be healthy and able to function in modern society. Why would you want to stack the odds against you children if you had a

One of the fetuses may be unhealthy and could be harming the wellbeing of the other fetus. Studies show that when having more than one fetus, disability and death rates for the baby is higher. Or having too many babies can affect the health of the mother. Other factors besides health play a factor in choosing to abort one fetus too. Some people cannot afford to raise two children at the same time. According to CNN, the average cost of raising a child is $245,000 a year. This does not include paying for the cost of college for both children at the same time. The Two-For-One procedure also was performed for social reasons. Due to modern technology, mothers can now have babies in their 40s and 50s. These women did not want to deal with raising twin teenagers in their 60s. Woman also get remarried and do not want to have more than two children with their new spouse, especially with other children

The author references decades of research on family dynamics and childbearing that conclude that families with two to three children tend to prosper, while those families with eight to ten find success much more difficult and usually live in the poorest

As Lyndon Baines Johnson says, “The family is the corner stone of our society. More than any other force it shapes the attitude, the hopes, the ambitions, and the values of the child. And when the family collapses it is the children that are usually damaged. When it happens on a massive scale the community itself is crippled. So, unless we work to strengthen the family, to create conditions under which most parents will stay together, all the rest — schools, playgrounds, and public assistance, and private concern — will never be enough” (Danes). He believed that family is the base of the society. The way that family is set up affects children in all ways. Family structure is very important and that no matter what we do,

Families and their specific roles with each other and society and community had evolved, rules for children and their place within the family structure were far more cohesive as they not only relied on each other for economic and social support, but on their communities as well. With new

Each society and sub society will have a variety of family structures, and these can be seen across the world, and they begin to affect the influences that act upon a child, this mean

Families were more routine and nuclear. What ought to be socially agreeable has changed amazingly since those times. In this way circumstances which were unsuitable in people in general coliseum have transformed into a common strategy for the duration of today's life. As demonstrated by Talcott Parsons, the family was sorted out on the alteration of the adult relatives. He clears up women's parts as nurturers and parental figures in contemporary industrialized social requests, where men give money related support and choose (p. 337). In today's overall population, it is more typical to see couples living individually and having children before wedding. Women are in the blink of an eye stands out in picking how they have to do their lives and destinies. Today, women of the family don't need to rely on upon the men any more and they can finish the same status with them if not higher. Varying qualities in family depletes the options in family structure and limit, thusly the significance of family doesn't express the leisure activities of any one society, sex, religion or ethnic

Most people like to think that a perfect family consist of two parents, and two kid’s one of each sex. But the sad truth is that most family’s today are broken. Just like Meredith F. Small wrote“…our ideas of the perfect family are narrow and just plain inaccurate…” Most families are full of problems. Family’s now a days are full of pain and heart ache. Parent will get divorces and remarried separating the family and making its difficult on the kids.

The small family size indicating one of the deficiencies of development . It is desturbing the harmony of sociecty in which one generation is repleced by the next. As the smaller famiies are producing less childern so, the old are more and young ones are less and it keep decreasing the young population. Moreover due to small family size childern are not learning many qualities such as responsibility of younger sibling and the difference between need and desire. Additionaly, small family size facing more stress and lonliness because of more work load and less people to share.

The combination for the continuing preference for two or one children and longer life expectancies will basically make the households without children very large and numerous. The household growth focuses on the older age groups while the traditional family is focused in accounting for only one in five households in the year 2025. Professionals will have to investigate and develop ways on how to accommodate the greater and different varieties of household types whether for construction, financing or management of housing.

Falbo had found that only children tend to have higher self-esteem and perform better in school, as well as a higher number of them get a post-secondary level education than people with siblings (Fablo and Goudreau, 2013). Anne-Marie Ambert, from the department of sociology at York University, had mentioned in her book, Changing Families: Relationships in Context, that children from larger families do not do as well in school, on average as children from smaller families. Also, children from smaller families advance professionally and socially, than from larger families (Ambert, 362). Leonardo Da Vinci, Thomas Edison, Elvis Presley, Condoleezza Rice, and Tiger Woods are some good examples of adults who were brought up in small family sizes and were only children. Each of these adults eventually made their way to fame and were highly successful in their academics and careers. Family size in the United States as well as Canada, have been shrinking since the 1960’s and only child families have increased significantly over the past few decades (Goudreau, 2013). So why are Canadians having so few children? Firstly, there are many reasons for such to happen, but a major reason is that some people expect higher-quality children; investing more time in them than usual. Zosia Bielski, a reporter who attended Oxford University mentioned in her article, What is so wrong with having only one child?,

He also found that relatives continue to be the main source of informal support in all social classes. The effects of there being more extended families is that in some areas of the world there is an ageing population, which can also mean that there are more empty nest families, these are families where the children have left home and it is just the elderly parents living in the home. An example of extended families can be found in South Asian families, here the family is vertically extended. In one household there is a man, his sons and grandsons, their wives and any unmarried daughters, this would make a family relatively large. Living like this means that kinship ties a strong and it also causes the younger generations to change their behaviour as the family would be quite ‘old fashioned’, which causes them to stay living with their family and increasing family size in Southern Asia.

S., 2012). Family size can be important because the more kids in the family, the more toys and games that will most likely be purchased. There is more chance of growth in markets when family size is bigger. When it is less than the parents will buy fewer toys. In addition, each child goes through a cycle, and they would soon get to the stage where they do not play with toys.