Essay on text questions

Option C is the correct answer. It's apparent from the first paragraph sentence, "However, despite being flawed or outrageous, conspiracy theories keep suspicion alive that Monroe was murdered or accidentally overdosed," that the author deems the conspiracy theories to be groundless.

Out of all homicide cases in the US, about one third of them end up unsolved. The unfortunate murder of 'The Boy In The Box' is no exception. The spine chilling case of 'The Boy In The Box' is about the devastating death of a little boy found in Philidelphia and no one knows who or what killed him. The mysterious death left many investigators baffled about who the boy was and how he died. Many people from different places developed their own theories to conclude his death, but like any other theories, there's always something that disproves them.

6b. With respect to the author’s conclusions (either specified or implied), I reject or do not agree with the following and why:

8. How did you feel when Child Protective Services took Lia away from her parents? Do you believe it was the right decision? Was any other solution possible in the situation?

2. Using the evidence you found during your reading, summarize the background of this case in three complete sentences.

4. Do you find any evidence of any of Mark’s students taking responsibility for their choices, decisions and/or actions? If yes, give 3 examples, if no, what 3 steps could the students take to become responsible for their lives?

After speaking with Mr. and Mrs. James, they informed us that they strongly believe their son has been murdered. We have begun to think that George was murdered by an unknown person, but with no remains

5. Which of the following did not occur as a consequence of the boys’ actions?

Which of the following words from the poem “Home Burial” give the reader insight into the relationship between the man and woman? Mark all that apply.

13. Which of the following is the best strategy for linking evidence to your ideas in an argument? (Points : 5)

The Lindbergh baby case became very interesting story all around the world. As you know Charles Lindbergh made headlines flying across the Atlantic from New York to Paris. Charles married Anne and settle down in a small town in New Jersey with the son Charles Jr. On, March 1, 1932 the Lindbergh 20 month old son Charles Jr, was kidnapped from his crib. The three components applies to this case because the police was called; first officer on the scene was the director Norman H. Schwarzkopf. During his investigation he notice it had rained and a lot of evidence had been washed away but notice some ladder marks by the

6. Does any one specific evidence stand out to you more than the rest? Which one? Why?

3) Do you agree with what was done in the case regarding the problem? Why or why not?

7. Are there any logical fallacies (pp. 394-397) in the argument? (you need to find at least 6+ fallacies). You need to identify which sentences in the story are fallacies and specify which fallacy (or fallacies) they violate. For example:

Imagine it is 1971 and you are on a flight from Portland to Seattle. You take your seat and get ready for your flight. You see an ominous man and you have your suspicions, but you think nothing of it. Later in the flight, you see him talking to the stewardess and see him slip her a note. He then shows her what is in his suitcase and asks her to sit with him. You start to get a bad feeling that something is not right. The man then seems to request something as the stewardess gets up to go to the cockpit. She appears to be anxious as she returns. After about twenty minutes your flight lands in Seattle and you have an eerie feeling that something suspicious has gone down (Gray, 2007). What you just witnessed was the infamous D.B. Cooper hijacking