then who do we believe? Essay

Millions of animals every year are being used in labs to test cosmetics. This problem has become a worldwide issue and the U.S. needs to make a change by prohibiting the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safe use.

When you think of cosmetic animal testing, what images come to mind? Do pictures of burned eyes and irritated skin appear? Well, it should. The FDA (Food & Drug Administration) has given a claim stating, “The FD&C Act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval” (“Product Testing - Animal Testing & Cosmetics” 1). According to this statement by the FDA, animal testing is not mandatory, so why do researchers continue to use it? It should be forbidden to use species of animals for cosmetic research and inhumane cruel experiments. Running test and experiments on innocent and voiceless animals can lead to the cause of their unnecessary deaths, have misleading research, and end up wasting (or costing) too much money.

Many of the cosmetics that we use every day have also been tested on animals. The number of animals used for cosmetic testing has been greatly reduced as the potential hazards have been eliminated. Products such as sunscreens, anti-dandruff shampoos, fluoride toothpaste, and anti-acne creams could not have been proven safe without the use of animal testing since they contain ingredients that cause a chemical change in the body that could be harmful, even deadly. Without these safety tests, it would be impossible to ensure that these products are safe.

Every year millions of animals are tested on and poisoned. “The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals.” (Humane Society International, 2016). Many animals are forced to inhale toxic fumes and take harmful chemicals in hope for scientists to know the outcome those products will have on humans. This is now proven that even though it may not be harmful for an animal it still may be for humans so it is a pointless attempt to help us, in the long run and killing many of helpless animals in the meantime. Makeup, cosmetics, household products and many more are the harmful things we test on animals to make sure it is “safe” for our use. More animals than you think are being tested by these terrible chemicals such as mice, fish, rats,

Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (Humane). Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to test cosmetic products on animals because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it isn’t necessary.

Cosmetic testing on the other hand is completely evil. Although it is better to test some of these things on animals then giving a cosmetic product to a human and just wishing them good luck. Yeah animals have DNA very similar to ours but it’s not a perfect match, and it some cases products do fail and harm humans (Product Testing, par. 1). On the other hand it’s better than not testing at all. So while putting these animals through hell rather than giving someone a faulty product is good to save some human lives, it’s still not right. Cosmetic animals testing isn’t required by law and their are other alternative so why do factories keep killing innocent animals? All

Millions of animals are being unneedlessly tested on for cosmetics, even though there are plenty of alternatives available and most of the results are unreliable or not applicable to humans. Although the fight against animal testing has made huge progress recently, America has yet to stop this cruel practice and chooses to torture animals while other countries are making a stop to the testing (“Animal Testing 101”).

The authors gave a descriptive article on the different types of alternative animal testing for cosmetics. In addition, the authors of this article is affiliated with the Miami Valley Laboratories and Kanebo Cosmetics. The publication of this article was in 2010, which is relatively recent. These authors have published many academic journals concerning the safety assessment of cosmetics. This journal article supports my research question by stating the different possible alternatives of animal testing on cosmetics before they are produced onto

The European Union is planning to ban animal testing for cosmetics to be by 2009. In the United States, Revlon and Avon were two of the first large companies to halt all cosmetics testing on animals. Some, on the other hand, have debated that the main ingredients in cosmetics have previously been tested on animals. Therefore, their safety is well established, which means that it's 'easier' for companies to find alternatives to test product formulations because most active ingredients have already been approved. As time, technology and technology progress, it is likely that cosmetic animal testing will either decrease or end all

The Food and Drug Administration no longer requires testing on animals in the United States prior to the sale of cosmetics, and we, as consumers, can help put an end to cosmetic testing on animals. Further, there are alternative tests that cosmetic companies can use which would eliminate animal testing and produce more accurate results.

Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.

“Beauty without cruelty” is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.

Cosmetic testing is harmful due to the chemical reaction of a certain product. When animals are tested for cosmetic purposes they

You are in Sephora and the most beautiful eyeshadow is there, but notice it is one of the many brands that test on animals. You keep picturing the poor bunnies, kittens and puppies stuffed in cages starving or force-feed to so much they cannot move. The sadness in their eyes, the multiple surgeries and tests they must go through on a daily basis. Animal testing is not, but should be a banned form of commercial and scientific testing. In a world as advanced as ours, animals should no longer be the test subject because it is no longer an ideal method. There are countless other effective methods of testing these products that do not involve harming anything. The animals chosen for the testing are all-around different from the human species. The use of animals costs much more than its equally effective counterparts. Testing harmful products on helpless animals is inhumane and cruel.

Testing for chemical hazards is a vital part in the creation of makeup. Analysis of hazardous chemicals in makeup is now a required standard, put forth by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (Meadows, Michelle). Though this law does not require the use of animals, many used animals during this time because of the lack of alternatives and experimentation. An argument used when discussing this issue of animal testing is the Lash Lure incident of 1933. The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine talk about when many were blinded from using this mascara and one died. This was due to an untested chemical called phenylenediamine. Reasoning for the lack of proficiency behind this argument is because this happened in the 1930’s when testing for unsafe chemicals wasn’t seen as necessary. Now there are many options to test for these chemicals and are required by law for these products to be safety approved (“Safety Testing”). In Countries like Europe the European Union has not only banned the practice of animal testing completely, but also banned advertising products have been tested on animals (Moran, Jim, Locke, Paul).