Essay on tuition

As of November 2015, many states have imposed free or reduced tuition fees for students attending community college. This proposal guarantees that those who otherwise cannot afford the average University tuition costs now have the ability to get a post-secondary degree. President Obama has enacted this plan, calling for the federal government to pay for the majority of tuition costs for these students. With this support, an improvement upon community colleges, economic growth, and bringing modest income families out of the vicious cycle of not being able to afford high tuition costs will all be achievable. Republicans think otherwise, asking where this money to pay for these expensive will come from.

In the article, The Real Reason College Tuition Costs So Much by Paul Campos (2015) explains the motives why college tuition rose so much over the last decades. In the years where baby boomers went to post-secondary education they had summer occupations to be able to afford college, but after a few decades, the funding that was open to the public for institutions were reduced. Consequently, cuts were in-forced, the forms of higher education have been rising year after year. Furthermore, over the last twenty years more people have been going to college, for example, since 1995, the number of scholars that have enrolled in graduate and undergraduate curriculums have amplified by approximately fifty percent. Also, the earnings of professors have

“College Prices Soar Again!” “Budget Cuts Cause Even Higher Tuition!” “Higher Education Now Even Less Affordable” These are all statements that have been seen all over the media: newspapers, magazines, television, and radio. (3 SV: SV) Rising college tuition in America has been a problem for years. Many students drop out after a single year due to the pricey costs of tuition. The rapid rise can be attributed to many aspects of the economy, not just a single source. There have also been some propositions of how costs could be lowered, but these have yet to be seen. The United States has gone into a tuition crisis.

College tuition is an expensive entity to pay for and not many people have the luxury of having college being completely paid for, however, so many people that have previous experience like teachers, counselors, and parents, want students to pursue this expensive entity so their future is brighter. Why is being a college student becoming a luxury that fewer people can afford and attend to? Factors like the actual cost for college tuition, costs for higher education, the working class and their difficulties of paying for other things in addition to tuition, proposals from our government, and tuition remission, is when we begin to see how big of a problem tuition costs actually are. School is an important opportunity that I have taken like many of my teachers, parents, and government have told me to take, but I still struggle paying for it; if school is a value that people should be taking advantage of, tuition needs to be more affordable in order to do so.

The presidential race is now consuming America. It is mentioned every morning in the news and in every “scroll” through social media. While important topics such a national security, national debt, and international affairs are brought up constantly in the debate spotlight, higher education is a topic less discussed. However, each presidential candidate has a specific, strategic plan to tackle current issues in higher education. The main issue that candidates believe should be addressed includes college costs and how they impact student debt. Each candidate has a different stance on the issue, and each have a plan to move toward solving the issue. This review will cover the current issue of student debt and how that is impacting America, each presidential candidates strategic plan to tackle this issue, a critique of each presidential candidate’s plan, and a reflection of solutions presented. Each candidate running for the 2016 presidency deserves full recognition, this review will focus on the two leading presidential candidates: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

In 1976, the average cost to attend a four year public university was $2,175; today, the average cost to attend a four year public university is $25,000 (Snyder). This means it is 1150% more expensive to go to college in The United States today than it was 30 years ago. This obviously would create a problem on how we as people are going to pay for our higher education. Today college has become almost a necessity to have a satisfactory life, and with these rising prices some individuals believe student loans are the only option. There are many reasons as to why the prices have risen, but the one undeniable fact is that this has created a problem within our country. Which, is known as the student debt crisis, and it has been on the rise the past couple years. This problem is affecting people all around the United States, and is causing multitude of problems for them all because they wanted to pursue higher education. Wanting to better your opportunities by bettering yourself is not something that needs to be punished, and sadly that is what is happening. This problem is something that needs to be fixed for the sake of Americans and our economy, but will also take time and a multitude of steps to correct.

Now President Elect Trump did not speak much on the issue. He has spoken out against student loan debt in his book “Crippled America,” acknowledging that government should not make money from student loans, yet they do, but no proposals on how to fix the problem (Josuweit, 2016). Other Republican candidates followed suit with Trump; Cruz did not publicly state his opinion or a plan, nor did his campaign site even bring up the issue (Josuweit, 2016). Out of all the Republican candidates, it was John Kasich who has took action against the issue in meaningful, consistent ways backed with legislation; as governor Ohio, he posed one hundred and twenty million in college debt relief (Josuweit,

One of the culprits hindering higher education for Americans is the tuition rates. A report by the Delta Cost Project indicates that if tuition had grown in pace with inflation, the average tuition at in-state public colleges would only have been $2,052 in 2010. The actual price of tuition was around $7,500, and it is increasing at around 5% per year, about twice as fast as the rate of inflation. Whereas everything else in the economy doubles in cost about every 32 years, college costs have been doubling around every 15 years. In a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, titled How the Changing Market Structure of U.S. Higher Education Explains College, the author, Caroline Hoxby, states that universities have little incentive

There have been arguments when discussing the price of attending college. The main argument that we have is whether college tuition is too expensive or not. Over the last few decades the college tuition rates have increased drastically, but is a rate increase necessarily a good or bad thing. I personally believe that the cost to attend college is too expensive especially for low and middle-income families. There are many reasons why tuition could be considered too expensive they include, rise of tuition, little financial aid, and lack of college savings to name a few. The first reason why college tuition is considered too expensive is the continuing rise of tuition itself. Between the years 1973 to 2008 tuition for a four-year increased

The United States is a reasonably well off country when it comes to education; we live is a first world country and children are expected to go to school from the age of around five until they graduate from college. As soon as parents find out that they are expecting, they are given the advice to start saving for colleges; College has become increasingly expensive as the years have gone by and many students end up graduating with thousands of dollars in student loans to pay back. Senator Bernie Sanders sees the problem with this and has made it a priority to advocate for lower or maybe even free college tuition. Sanders would sign the “College for All Act” which would make sure that no one would be denied an education simply because of their economic situation.

“We all believe that every student in America deserves a fair shot at a higher education and a path toward the middle class,” Lawmakers agree on that statement. The crux is how to provide that fair shot. President Obama is “attempting to tackle the problem of skyrocketing higher education costs in the US” by passing a bill where states lessen the financial

President Obama also “released a series of proposals on college affordability and accountability that includes the idea of pegging eligibility for federal financial aid, consisting largely of Pell Grants and federal student loans, to the earnings of an institution 's graduates” (Heller, 2014). This shows that he is trying to make cheaper so that more people in theory will go to college to higher their education because if the lower prices of attending.

Democrats believe College tuition should either be free or have more federal aid accessibility . Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and President Obama all want to make college free, not using vouchers, but by having Federal funding flow into colleges in order to eliminated tuition fees. (Kelley, paragraph 6), Whereas The Republican party know that college tuition is high and has a different take on making tuition lower. Republicans earlier this year proposed a bill in which states would cut the tuition for in state residents and raising out of state residents a bit. Republicans aren’t sure how long term funding will pan out, but are hopeful that in the future it will become “baked into the budget”. (Brown, paragraph 15).

In fact, “nearly 7 out of every 10 new graduates of four-year colleges are in debt” while they only have “an average balance of nearly $30,000” (Hillary Clinton’s Commitment). The debts of these students are the “second largest source of consumer debt” and are holding back the economy since it “prevents people from forming families, buying homes, and starting small businesses” (Hillary Clinton’s Commitment). In response, Clinton has created her own policy, the New College Compact, to combat the rising costs of higher education. The plan has been stated to allow students to attend “a 4-year public college without taking loans for tuition, attend community college tuition-free” while urging “states to re-invest and schools to reduce costs and raise graduation rates”(College Compact). Furthermore, students who come from families making “$85,000 a year or less will be able to go to a 4-year public college or university tuition free”(Hillary Clinton’s Commitment). According to her plan, the “income threshold will increase by 10,000 a year...so that by 2021, all students with a family income of $125,000” will not have to pay for tuition, which covers “more than 80 percent of all families (Hillary Clinton’s Commitment). In addition, Clinton’s plan will “protect Pell Grant funding to help low- and middle- income students pay non-tuition

When asked if the candidates supported free college education, Kander responded, “I disagree with those who say we should make it free. It is too expensive. Here is something we can do. We can make it where people who have student loans can refinance that student loan the same way they can a home loan or an auto loan. We can cap the interest that they pay. Those are concrete things we can do that would help a lot. I personally was amazed last year when Senator Blunt said something along the lines of the reason folks are graduating with so much debt is because of their lifestyle during school as if the extra bowl of ramen in the microwave was the reason that folks are graduating with an average of 26,000 dollars of debt. It 's interesting to hear Senator Blunt talk about Pell grants because Senator Blunt voted to cut Pell grants five years ago and he 's talking about is a situation now where he has worked to restore the funding back to where it was. He is just taking it back to where it was before he cut it. Senator, someone who sets a fire and puts it out is not a fireman. He is an arsonist." And Blunt responded, “I think the sort of fast talk about free college education without any real idea how to pay for it is foolish. One of the things I have tried to do and I believe we will get done this year is return to the year-round Pell grant. This is the grant you get if you truly are qualified economically to get, not a loan, but a grant. If you can go to school in the fall and