viking role pat olafson Essay

The warehouse that Mark had sold off when he sold his previous company was still for sale after being on the market for two years and having over $2M spent on getting it ready for sale. Since Mark had an existing relationship with the landlord, the real estate market was at a record low, and Mark didn’t have to take a loan since he still had the cash from his previous venture. The landlord was asking $9/square foot, tempting Mark to make the same mistake that the competition made. Instead of accepting it and falling into the trap, Mark did extensive research on the town and comps in the area and felt confident offering $4.50/square foot in four consecutive five year leases starting at $4, then $4.25, all the way to $5 thus freeing up more working capital for the launch of his business. Mark’s homework on his timing paid off and locked down the warehouse he previously owned but for his new venture.

However, Candace was very skilled and duplicitous during the negotiation. While at no point did Candace lie to me. She did make the full entirety of Absentia’s plans for the property. It was later revealed to me, after the formal negotiation, that Absentia planned to develop a high-rise hotel directly behind the Bullard House. This is completely unacceptable to my constituents, however, the deal was already agreed upon by the time I was informed. Candace used the questionable negotiation strategy of deception to ensure she received a favorable deal. She knowingly withheld information that would have impact the terms of our deal. For her, the deal was a success. However, I am left feeling mislead. When I would question her about the types of commercial development that her constitutes sought to pursue, she would make vague references to tasteful additions within the property. The lack of effective question is a failure of mine. I should have begun to ask probing questions, as Lewicki suggests, when I realized that she was not fully disclosing information. Instead I allowed the ambiguous answers to be the basis of my decision

On August 06, 2006, via telephone, Partner-D made the initial call to Partner-W as suggested by Goodfriend. Partner-W introduced herself as a licensed mortgage broker, working for Company-C, and that she was successful at finding affordable housing without the use of a real estate agent. Party-W was certain there were plenty of people to rent out any property obtained; that buying in the area required minimum down; a profit would occur within a year and the house would pay for itself. During this event, PartnerW was using interest-based persuasion (Shell et al., 2007) while at the same time, used the power to educate (Ury, 2007). Partner-W started out by identifying Partner-D’s interest and/or purpose for buying property, which was clearly defined (Fisher et al., 1991). And it was further determined, by the use of integrative bargaining, it would be a win-win situation and would create a shared goal for mutual gain (Fisher et al., 1991). Partner-D would be gaining extra income; and Partner-W would gain commission for the sell of the property. Partner-D went to the balcony to think about the information provided (Ury, 2007). Overall, the idea seemed like a good idea and Partner-D felt she was in good hands

People- Pat Olafson is a local investor and real estate developer. In comparison to Sandy, Pat has been very financially successful. Their relationship seems to be multi-layered. Pat plays the role of bank, landlord, and client to Sandy and WoodCrafters. While not illegal, or even immoral, allowing one person, or entity, to have so much control over your business life isn’t the wisest decision. In addition, the combination of Pat’s success and Sandy’s hardships seems to have caused Sandy to be jealous of Pat’s success. It would be in Sandy’s best interest to recognize that his perception of Pat bears no significance on this negotiation. Sandy would be best served by leaving his perceptions behind and keeping his emotions in check.

Rosemberg served the tenants with written notice that their lease was being terminated pursuant to the termination clause. Among other things the lease stated, such termination is as of November 30, 2007. Please be advised that, if you do not remove yourself from the premises on or before said date, the Owner-Landlord intends to bring a holdover proceeding in the Civil Court to evict you therefrom.

The Tecumseh condominium complex is a waterfront condominium complex located at 312 Severn Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland. (Compl. ¶ 1). On September 1, 2016, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) was a tenant in a condominium unit rented to her by Defendant, Tecumseh Condo, LLC (“Tecumseh”). (Compl. ¶¶ 3, 15, 23). On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) filed a four-count complaint in this Court. (Compl.) Notably, only one count—a claim for

Beowulf is considered to be an epic hero. An epic hero is a character in an epic poem who is noble, brave, and is affected by great events or admired for his achievements. Beowulf was a dedicated person and devoted to his kingdom. Throughout the story, Beowulf achieved many accomplishments and goals. While overcoming achievements such as killing monsters and saving Heorot, Beowulf was beyond brave, strong, and heroic.

Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it. All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice

Both of us will lose at the end of the day. What issues are most important to my opponent (in order of importance): 1. Paying me $7,000 / unit in condominium sales (the original contract amount) 2. I don’t default so that he can receive the full amount I owe him ($210,000) 3. Keep my rent at $5,000 / month 4. Receive loan payment of $10,000 from me What is my opponent’s BATNA? Reservation price? Target? BATNA: condominium sales Reservation Price: condominium sales Target: Receive my full loan re-payment of $210,000, pay me $7,000 / unit in condominium sales, increase my rent to $5,000 What are my opponent’s sources of power? He holds the upper hand because he can call the renewable loan that I owe him any time and I will have to declare bankruptcy. Additionally, he is legally allowed to pay me $7,000 / unit in condominium sales (much lower than my costs) because the original agreement says so. What is my opening move/first strategy? Explain him the situation, what’s at stake, how he will also lose and not receive the full amount I owe him if I were to default. Then request my target, negotiate till my reservation price. What is the current/future relationship between the negotiating parties? Receive less than $210,000 if I default, pay me $9,500 / unit in Receive less than $210,000 if I default, pay me $7,000 / unit in

Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it. All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice

“Speaking of business, I never got to finish before the subject of Las Vegas took over. I had a lawyer draw up papers to do a gradual sale of my business to Maria who will run Domestic Deepclean as she sees fit. Sure, it spells out that I’ll get an income from it, but because of her insistence, not that I’m particularly concerned one way or the other. She has some good ideas. I hope they all work for her and grows the customer base she already has with new people. To do it, she gets all the inventory, equipment, and the building, of course. Every one of the current clients know Maria because they dealt with her first-hand. They love her, but in the past we were a one-two punch. So as a result, Maria and I had a company meeting last week with

The University of California, Berkeley study outlines very specific guidelines. From the findings of their study, the University of California, Berkeley team indicates that when lane-splitting is performed under restricted situations (i.e. at speeds no greater than 15 miles per hour (mph) more than what the flow of traffic is traveling and never to exceed over 50 mph), lane-splitting can be safe (Rice, Troszak, and Erhardt 4). To place this specification into perspective, if the traffic is stopped, a motorcycle driver can lane-split while traveling at a speed of 15 mph or less. If the traffic is moving at 40 mph, a motorcycle driver can only lane-split at a speed of 10 mph greater than that of surrounding traffic in order to stay within

The subject matter of the case is presented as a negotiation between a real estate developer, Hawkins, and a possible anchor tenant, Discount Marketplace. Both parties are represented by professional negotiators: Myra Hart is representing the Hawkins Company and Genia is representing the Discount Marketplace.

So we offered them the price of $63M for Hamilton property explaining that this price is the best one we can offer, this price is with a big discount, the real price for this property is about $88M. Taking into account that the budget of Estate one is only $60M we reduced the price for them to $60M on condition that additional $3M would be paid if the commercial development is allowed in Hamilton. WAP for Pearl investment is $38M, WAP for Estate One is $60M, so ZOPA for this negotiation is $12M. BATNA for Pearl investment is to sell this property for $38M to Quincy Developments.

This action has caused Lend lease sites in lockdown across the country, as stated by one of the employee Brain Parker “The company is not currently bargaining in good faith”