1.  why companies need to transfer price and advantages? 2. explain the transfer pricing method that is used / can be used in this company. Explain the advantages and disadvantages?

Managerial Accounting
15th Edition
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Chapter10: Evaluating Decentralized Operations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2TIF
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

1.  why companies need to transfer price and advantages?

2. explain the transfer pricing method that is used / can be used in this company. Explain the advantages and disadvantages?

Birch Paper Company
If I were to price these boxes any lower than $480 a thousand, l'd be countermanding my order of last month
for our salesmen to stop shaving their bids and to bid full-cost quotations. I've been trying for weeks to improve
the quality of our business, and if I turn around now and accept this job at $430 or $450 or something less than
$480, I'll be tearing down this program I've been working so hard to build up. The division can't very well
show a profit by putting in bids which don't even cover a fair share of overhead costs, let alone give us a profit.
- James Brunner, Manager of Thompson Division
Birch Paper Company was a medium-sized, partly integrated paper company, producing white
and kraft papers and paperboard. A portion of its paperboard output was converted into corrugated
boxes by the Thompson Division, which also printed and colored the outside surface of the boxes.
Including Thompson, the company had four production divisions and a timberland division that
supplied part of the company's pulp requirements.
For several years each division had been judged independently on the basis of its profit and return
on investment. Top management had been working to gain effective results from a policy of
decentralizing responsibility and authority for all decisions except those relating to overall company
policy. The company's top officials believed that in the past few years the concept of decentralization
had been successfully applied and that the company's profits and competitive position had definitely
improved.
Early in 2002 the Northern Division designed a special display box for one of its papers in
conjunction with the Thompson Division, which was equipped to make the box. Thompson's staff for
package design and development spent several months perfecting the design, production methods,
and materials that were to be used. Because of the box's unusual color and shape, these were far from
standard. According to an agreement between the two divisions, the Thompson Division was
reimbursed by the Northern Division for the cost of its design and development work.
When the specifications were all prepared, the Northem Division asked for bids on the corrugated
box from the Thompson Division and from two outside companies. Each Birch Paper Company
division manager normally was free to buy from whatever supplier he wished; on inter-company
sales, divisions selling to other divisions were expected to meet the going market price.
Transcribed Image Text:Birch Paper Company If I were to price these boxes any lower than $480 a thousand, l'd be countermanding my order of last month for our salesmen to stop shaving their bids and to bid full-cost quotations. I've been trying for weeks to improve the quality of our business, and if I turn around now and accept this job at $430 or $450 or something less than $480, I'll be tearing down this program I've been working so hard to build up. The division can't very well show a profit by putting in bids which don't even cover a fair share of overhead costs, let alone give us a profit. - James Brunner, Manager of Thompson Division Birch Paper Company was a medium-sized, partly integrated paper company, producing white and kraft papers and paperboard. A portion of its paperboard output was converted into corrugated boxes by the Thompson Division, which also printed and colored the outside surface of the boxes. Including Thompson, the company had four production divisions and a timberland division that supplied part of the company's pulp requirements. For several years each division had been judged independently on the basis of its profit and return on investment. Top management had been working to gain effective results from a policy of decentralizing responsibility and authority for all decisions except those relating to overall company policy. The company's top officials believed that in the past few years the concept of decentralization had been successfully applied and that the company's profits and competitive position had definitely improved. Early in 2002 the Northern Division designed a special display box for one of its papers in conjunction with the Thompson Division, which was equipped to make the box. Thompson's staff for package design and development spent several months perfecting the design, production methods, and materials that were to be used. Because of the box's unusual color and shape, these were far from standard. According to an agreement between the two divisions, the Thompson Division was reimbursed by the Northern Division for the cost of its design and development work. When the specifications were all prepared, the Northem Division asked for bids on the corrugated box from the Thompson Division and from two outside companies. Each Birch Paper Company division manager normally was free to buy from whatever supplier he wished; on inter-company sales, divisions selling to other divisions were expected to meet the going market price.
In 2002, the profit margins of converters such as the Thompson Division were being squeezed.
Thompson, as did many other similar converters, bought the paperboard and linerboard used in
making boxes, and its function was to print, cut, and shape the material into boxes.1 Although it
bought most of its materials from other Birch divisions, most of Thompson's sales were made to
outside customers. If Thompson got the order from Northern, it probably would buy its linerboard
and corrugating medium from the Southern Division of Birch. Thus, before giving its bid to
Northern, Thompson got a quote for materials from the Southern Division. Although Southern had
been running below capacity and had excess inventory, it quoted the prevailing market price for
materials. Southern's out-of-pocket costs for both liner and corrugating medium were about 60% of
its selling price. About 70% of Thompson's out-of-pocket costs of $400 per thousand boxes
represented the cost of linerboard and the corrugating medium.
The Northern Division received bids on the boxes of $480 per thousand from the Thompson
Division, $430 per thousand from West Paper Company, and $432 per thousand from Eire Papers,
Ltd. Eire Papers offered to buy from Birch the outside linerboard with the special printing already on
it, but it would supply its own inside liner and corrugating medium. The outside liner would be
supplied by the Southern Division at a price equivalent to $90 per thousand boxes, and would be
printed for $30 per thousand by the Thompson Division. Of the $30, about $25 would be out-of-
pocket costs.
Since the bidding results appeared to be a little unusual, William Kenton, manager of the
Northern Division, discussed the wide discrepancy in the bids with Birch's commercial vice
president. He told the vice president, "We sell in a very competitive market, where higher costs
cannot be passed on. How can we be expected to show a decent profit and return on investment if we
have to buy our supplies at more than 10% over the going market?"
Knowing that Mr. Brunner had been unable to operate the Thompson Division at capacity on
occasion during the past few months, it seemed odd to the vice president that Mr. Brunner would
add the full 20% overhead and profit charge to his out-of-pocket costs. When he asked Mr. Brunner
about this, the answer he received was the statement that appears at the beginning of the case.
Brunner went on to say that, having done the developmental work on the box and having received no
profit on that work, he felt entitled to a good markup on the production of the box itself.
The vice president explored further the cost structures of the various divisions. He remembered a
comment of the controller at a meeting the week before, to the effect that costs which were variable
for one division could be largely fixed for the company as a whole. He knew that in the absence of
specific orders from top management Mr. Kenton would accept the lowest bid, which was that of the
West Paper Company for $430. However, it would be possible for top management to order the
acceptance of another bid if the situation warranted such action. And although the volume
represented by the transactions in question was less than 5% of the volume of any of the divisions
involved, future transactions could conceivably raise similar problems.
Transcribed Image Text:In 2002, the profit margins of converters such as the Thompson Division were being squeezed. Thompson, as did many other similar converters, bought the paperboard and linerboard used in making boxes, and its function was to print, cut, and shape the material into boxes.1 Although it bought most of its materials from other Birch divisions, most of Thompson's sales were made to outside customers. If Thompson got the order from Northern, it probably would buy its linerboard and corrugating medium from the Southern Division of Birch. Thus, before giving its bid to Northern, Thompson got a quote for materials from the Southern Division. Although Southern had been running below capacity and had excess inventory, it quoted the prevailing market price for materials. Southern's out-of-pocket costs for both liner and corrugating medium were about 60% of its selling price. About 70% of Thompson's out-of-pocket costs of $400 per thousand boxes represented the cost of linerboard and the corrugating medium. The Northern Division received bids on the boxes of $480 per thousand from the Thompson Division, $430 per thousand from West Paper Company, and $432 per thousand from Eire Papers, Ltd. Eire Papers offered to buy from Birch the outside linerboard with the special printing already on it, but it would supply its own inside liner and corrugating medium. The outside liner would be supplied by the Southern Division at a price equivalent to $90 per thousand boxes, and would be printed for $30 per thousand by the Thompson Division. Of the $30, about $25 would be out-of- pocket costs. Since the bidding results appeared to be a little unusual, William Kenton, manager of the Northern Division, discussed the wide discrepancy in the bids with Birch's commercial vice president. He told the vice president, "We sell in a very competitive market, where higher costs cannot be passed on. How can we be expected to show a decent profit and return on investment if we have to buy our supplies at more than 10% over the going market?" Knowing that Mr. Brunner had been unable to operate the Thompson Division at capacity on occasion during the past few months, it seemed odd to the vice president that Mr. Brunner would add the full 20% overhead and profit charge to his out-of-pocket costs. When he asked Mr. Brunner about this, the answer he received was the statement that appears at the beginning of the case. Brunner went on to say that, having done the developmental work on the box and having received no profit on that work, he felt entitled to a good markup on the production of the box itself. The vice president explored further the cost structures of the various divisions. He remembered a comment of the controller at a meeting the week before, to the effect that costs which were variable for one division could be largely fixed for the company as a whole. He knew that in the absence of specific orders from top management Mr. Kenton would accept the lowest bid, which was that of the West Paper Company for $430. However, it would be possible for top management to order the acceptance of another bid if the situation warranted such action. And although the volume represented by the transactions in question was less than 5% of the volume of any of the divisions involved, future transactions could conceivably raise similar problems.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Cost volume profit (CVP) analysis
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337912020
Author:
Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines…
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337115773
Author:
Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:
9781947172609
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:
9781337514835
Author:
MOYER
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305970663
Author:
Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:
Cengage Learning